Show your support by purchasing VDARE.com merchandise. 
VDARE.com's Amazon connection has been restored! Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
03/19/10 - A Reader Accuses Us Of Hypocrisy Over St. Patrick's Day
From:
Charles Black (e-mail
him)
Re: Joe Guzzardi's Column:
Obamacare + Amnesty + One Term President. But Where's
The Immigration Moratorium?
Guzzardi
wrote:
"Not only are there no
Republican cosignatories—but
House Leader
Nancy Pelosi's name is conspicuously
missing."
Leadership generally doesn't cosponsor bills because it
doesn't want to look like it favors a certain
Member of Congress or an
individual legislative text before it's vetted through
committee.
When you do
see a leader on a bill it is most likely the whip who
will often cosponsor as a trade off to win the bill
sponsor's vote on another future issue.
The exception may occur if the bill originated with
leadership or if it is that leader's
lifelong project or a goal promised during his
campaign.
For example,
Pelosi cosponsored an environment bill because that was
the issue that she campaigned on years ago that won her
a seat in Congress.
As
far as
H.R. 4321, Gutierrez's treasonous
amnesty bill, you could
conclude that Pelosi is not committed enough to sign on
or that she thinks it's a loser and doesn't want to get
behind it.
Black's previous letters about the Department of
Homeland Security visa waiver program, Barney Frank's
immigration advocacy and a fraud immigration marriage
that ended in murder are
here,
here and
here.
Black describes himself as a Democrat who is "100
percent" on our side of the immigration debate.
[PermaLink] [Top] [Letters Home]
From:
Maria Gomez (e-mail
her)
Re: Brenda Walker's Blog:
San Bernardino Church Turns Mexican And Americans Feel
Abandoned
Church is not
a place to act out against others who may not be of the
same ethnic background.
Instead, church is for anyone that calls himself a
Roman Catholic or any other Christian religion.
God does not
discriminate. He wants the same rights for everyone, no
matter if you're white, black, Asian or Hispanic. If you
go to church to talk or judge others then you are
disobeying
God's word.
If most of the
San Bernardino church-goers are Hispanic and no English
speakers attend, then everything during the Mass will
logically be said in Spanish.
And just to remind your readers that the whites were not
the first ones in this country. It belonged to
American Indians before the Europeans stole it from
them.
In other
words, at one time whites were immigrants.
It's just that
VDARE.COM doesn't
want to look at it that way. But God wants us to
work together by treating each other like the brothers
and sisters we are.
To
close with the Bible's words:
Romans 8:28
"And we know that God causes everything to work together
for the good of those who love God and who have been
called according to His purpose."
Joe
Guzzardi comments:
We've heard Gomez's argument
many times before: that
Indians were the
first Americans. And we are familiar with the view
point that God sees us all as equals. But the point
Walker made is that the rapidly changing demographics of
California in general,
and San Bernardino in particular, has stripped Americans
not of their faith and good will to their fellow man but
of their churches, the place where they came together to
celebrate those qualities.
[PermaLink] [Top] [Letters Home]
From: Robert
Waterfield (e-mail
him)
In today's
multicultural world, no one church will be a perfect fit
for every congregant.
I would just
suggest that these disenfranchised Roman Catholics not
totally give up on their faith but get in their car to
try a different parish.
Show your lack of support by keeping
your checkbook closed to the Catholic Church. Give
to a different charity.
The
U.S. Catholic Church's leadership is as
misguided as
Ridiculous!
Native or long time residents of
There are
too
many sermons from the Catholic pulpit that push the
progressive, Democratic agenda of amnesty, open borders
and embracing illegal aliens.
No wonder
Catholics are fed up with their church. I find it all
very sad.
[PermaLink] [Top] [Letters Home]
From: Paula
Smydo (e-mail her)
The
Roman Catholic Church, especially
in California, realized long ago that its
demographics were changing rapidly to a predominantly
Hispanic make up.
So, in the same way as
Wal-Mart or
Coca-Cola, it made a wise business decision. Masses
and other church functions in Hispanic neighborhoods
were converted from English to Spanish. By making its
parishes more inclusive, the Catholics increase the
likelihood of donations. Even the poor give—many
consider it blasphemous not to. For the church, it's all
about money.
But it's sad that
When
my ancestors arrived, they took steps to learn
English and become citizens and they did not receive
free hand outs from the
Joe Guzzardi replies:
The Roman Catholic Church still has outposts of where
doing good deeds outweighs pandering to the illegal
alien lobby and grubbing for money. On the whole,
though, it's maddening that the Church leadership
steadfastly refuses to endorse
federal immigration law enforcement.
Consider retired parish priest, Fordham University Ph.D.
and ally Father Pat Bascio whose position on illegal
immigration advocates was reported by Brenda in her
earlier column:
"Groups that favor illegal immigration often invoke the
Almighty and wrap themselves in the mantle of compassion
as their justification for turning a blind eye to the
terrible consequences to America of our porous borders.
If simply giving somebody something they want without
making them earn it is compassion, then laziness is next
to godliness.
"The American and Mexican bishops should use their good
intentions and powerful influence to remind the Mexican
government that it has a responsibility for its
citizens."
[PermaLink] [Top] [Letters Home]