Why I`m An Indian—not “Native American”

[Also by David Yeagley:

An American Indian View of Immigration
;

To Deport or not to Deport
]

As an Oklahoma Comanche, I consider
myself an “Indian”—an American Indian.

I am not a

Native American
, nor a

First Nations
, nor an

Aboriginal
, and least of all an

Indigenous
person.

I`m simply a descendent of savage
hunters with the most lethal war skills and

artful horsemanship
known in American history.

I could refer to myself as nerm
or num,” which, if pronounced half-way
correctly, indicates I am of the Comanche people. Numunu
is what we call ourselves in our own language. But who
would know what I`m talking about except Comanches?

White people have called all our
tribes “Indians” for over four centuries. And
even when they referred to us as Sioux, Comanche, Nes
Perce, Coeur d`Alene, most of those names were what some
European explorer heard one tribe calling some other
tribe.

Few of us are called by our own
name in our own language. So what?
Names of European countries
also get changed quite a bit in other languages:
Germans, “Deutscher” are called “Tedeschi”
in Italian, for instance. Our Indian peoples are
distinguished from one another in historical treaties by
the use of these foreign names.

The quest for Ideological
Correctness—through terms like Native American, First
Nations, Aboriginal, or Indigenous—is ill-fated if not
ludicrous. Why swap one European name for another? Why
exchange a classy, descriptive French name, such as
Coeur d`Alene (“heart
of the awl
—indicating able hagglers) for an

English derivative of a Latin abstraction
like aboriginal,”
a vague chronological distinction, or a Spanish
derivative like “indigenous,” originally meaning
poor and naked?

 “Indian” is the

oldest, most sensible term
. When Columbus used the
term “Indios” when he wrote to Queen Isabella in
1492 it was because he thought he`d arrived on the
western shores of India. What else would he call
the people he encountered in the world new to him?

The Tatar Relation
manuscript (ca.1247), written in Latin, already referred
to the Asian sub-continent people of the “Sindhus”
(the Sanskrit word for “river”) as Indiam.
In English, as early as the 6th century,
A.D., Boethius used the terms “India,” “Indus,”
and “Indea” in his

De consolatione philosophiae.
The Persian pronunciation of “Indus”
was of course “hindus,” with the sounded “H.”

One Hindu authority
says such a term didn`t enter
the “Hindu” vocabulary until the 7th century, or the age
of Islam.

But not until 1662 did the Persian
term appear in English, in the translations of

John Davies
(of Kidwell). By the next century,
Anglo-Americans referred to people from the Indus as
“Hindus.” The only people whom they called “Indians”
were the inhabitants of the Americas.

Columbus used

no such phrase
as una gente en Dios,”
as modern revisionists like to say. These contortionists
propagate this myth to suggest that we are spiritually
superior beings, so impressive that

Columbus
called us “a people in God.”  But
what he called us was naked
as when their mothers bore them
.”

That term Native
American
,”
like so many things, appeared for the
first time in the 1960s, as part of

the legal definition
of

who
is considered an American Indian. It involved

land squabbles,
of course, and the stakes have
always been high. When other groups wanted in on the
definition through the term “Native American,”
many “American Indians”

objected strongly
, to the agreement

of some responsible scholars.

In general, however, academic
trends list with the social winds.

Name-changing
, as other

university fads
, is generally the work of Marxist
racial agitators
, ever anxious to overturn “the
establishment”
as a means of clutching at power.
Changing the names of things, usurping their meaning, or

removing
names

entirely
, are favorite tactics of these leftists.
Thus “Negro” became “Colored,” then
“Black,”
then “Afro-American” and now

“African American.”

But then American

states,
counties, rivers,

schools
and

teams
weren`t generally named after Negroes, so that
particular name game had its limits. Indian names are
the next target. And that name game is just beginning.

But count me out. Don`t call me
Native. Call me Savage, Redskin, Injun, Comanche, Red
Devil. Don`t worry about being sued. You can`t victimize
me with names. I`m not black, I`m red.

“Indian” is what Americans
have always called us, and it is the

White Anglo-Saxon Protestant
with whom we have had

mostly to do
. The victory was

his
, not the Negro`s, the Hispanic`s, the

Communist`s,
or the

Arab Muslim`s
. Why should I care what they call me?

By the way, I am thinking of
suing a certain Michael Weiner—for renaming himself with
my honorable, sacred name,

Savage


Dr. David A. Yeagley [email
him
] is an enrolled
member of the


Comanche Nation
, Elgin,
Oklahoma. His articles appear in


TheAmericanEnterprise.com
FrontPageMagazine.com,
and on his own Web site


BadEagle.com
, and he is a
regular speaker for


Young America`s Foundation
.
David Yeagley`s columns for
VDARE.COM include

An American Indian View of Immigration,
and

To Deport or not to Deport.
David Yeagley is the author of
 
Bad Eagle: The Rantings of a Conservative Comanche.