2011 Campus “Hate Crime” Hoax Season About To Begin

Students are heading
back to college, but I don`t expect to see any new
campus hate crime hoaxes until spring. The simple
reason: spring is hoax season. Who wants to march and
protest out in the cold?

But last spring saw a
bumper crop! And this year, there will no doubt be
more—because of the dynamics of
diversity in Obama`s Brave New America.

It`s important to
remember that the



Hate Crime hysteria


has real (white) victims. My May 26 VDARE.COM story,



Report from Occupied America: Free the Mizzou Two!
, told the increasingly common tale of two young men at University
of Missouri Columbia ("Mizzou"),
arrested,
indicted, and coerced into copping guilty pleas, who
hadn`t committed any crimes—beyond being white, male,
and heterosexual.

The whole episode was



Kafkaesque
.
Then again, life today for


a


normal, red-blooded, American
college boy



increasingly


is
Kafkaesque
.

Meanwhile, Mizzou does
have a serious problem—violent black crimes against
members of the university community on and near campus.
But university chancellor Brady Deaton, who denounced
the innocent Mizzou Two, is silent about that.




Hate U.

Between late January and
late March of this year, black students on seven
different college campuses in Ohio, California, Missouri
and Tennessee were the victims of
"hate crimes".

Just kidding!

Except that the people
behind these
"hate crimes"
, all obvious hoaxes, aren`t laughing.
They seek to intimidate, disenfranchise, and imprison
people who have broken no laws, based solely on the
color of the latter`s skin—and at the same time extort
huge sums of money and take over their respective
campuses.

The real campus racism
story, the one the MainStream Media refuse to tell, is
one of black racial animus.

The past

23 years
have seen one


black race hoax

after another, on and


off campus
. Though many of these "hate
crimes"
remain technically “unsolved,"
I don`t know of any claims by campus



"blacks"

(or their non-black leftist comrades) that
weren`t
hoaxes. Thus the
rational response to each lurid new claim should be
skepticism
—on a par with what we bring to the daily
e-mails promising us millions of dollars.

And yet each new claim
is treated by college administrators, police, and the
media, as if no black race hoaxes had ever been exposed.

And
even after they
are exposed as hoaxes
, black students and their
white enablers act as though they had been real.
Simultaneously, they variously ignore, cover up, and lie
about, the constant violent, racially-motivated crimes
being perpetrated by blacks against whites (and Asians)
on and off campus, and


vilifying and attempting to destroy
those whites who complain
.
(See



here
,



here
,



here
,



here
,



here
,



here
,



here
,



here
,



here
,



here
,



here

and



here
.)

Get out your scorecards.
During the 2010 spring semester, these campus
"hate crimes"
were allegedly committed: 


  • In a


    March 26 email


    to the UT Knoxville campus community, Chancellor
    Jimmy Cheek [
    Email
    him
    ]decried
    at least four recent incidents involving
    "derogatory and racist language" written on dorm posters, etc.,
    and was reportedly
    "calling for
    change"
    :


"We will not tolerate disrespect, racism or bias on our campus. One
of my top priorities as chancellor is to increase
diversity on our campus, and one of the best ways to do
that is to create and maintain a welcoming campus
climate for all."


[
UT
reports detail bias incidents; chancellor calls for
change

by Chloe White Kennedy,
Knoxville News
Sentinel
, March 26, 2010.]



  • On July 21,



    another noose hoax hit UC San Diego
    .
    But since most students and university personnel,
    and even many journalists were off on vacation, it
    had minimal effect. Summer race hoaxes simply aren`t
    noose-worthy.

("Hate
crimes"
that were almost certainly copycat hoaxes
targeted



Jews

and



homosexuals

at UC Davis, gay activists



at the University of Idaho College of Law
,
and



Jews at UC Berkeley
.
Hoax envy runs rampant.)

What makes for a
successful race hoax?

The Hocking College Hoax
never caught fire. The MSM doesn`t much care about
community colleges. The Johnson & Wales Hoax also failed
to get a national stage.

You never know


which race fraud will attain media stardom
.
But UCSD can serve as a case study.

In retrospect, the
reasons for the great success of the UCSD hoaxers were:



  • Friends in high places:

    Pres.



    Barack Obama

    and Attorney General Eric Holder have repeatedly
    reiterated their support for




    anti-white racism

    (see also


    here
    ), and for



    black race hoaxes
    ;




  • Media support
    :
    The MSM opposed California`s 1996 anti-affirmative
    action Prop. 209 and have sought to destroy it ever
    since its enactment, and thus devoted credulous,
    saturation coverage to the UCSD hoaxes;





  • Numbers:



    With over 28,000 students
    —only
    26 percent of whom are white—UCSD is a huge,
    high-profile campus;





  • Historic significance: In spite of a limited amount of stealth
    affirmative action, UCSD had held the line on academic
    standards better than any other UC campus, as witnessed
    by



    blacks comprising only 1.6 percent of its student body
    . Success at UCSD could presage the end of any standards in the


    UC system

    and the de facto gutting of Prop. 209 The UCSD hoaxes and protests
    appear to have been coordinated with the long-planned,



    March 4 statewide black and Hispanic student and faculty
    protests
    demanding more illegal privileges—more race and ethnicity-based
    money, admissions, jobs and programs.








  • Tenacity:

    The UCSD hoaxers never quit, committing hoax after hoax,
    lying about each in turn, and various additional crimes
    (trespassing, vandalism);









  • Help on the Ground I:

    The hoaxers were supported by the faculty and students
    of entire programs and departments of pseudo-scholarship
    that exist, in order to maintain race-focused job mills,
    and promote race consciousness and irredentism:



    Ethnic Studies
    ,



    "Chicano/a and Latino/a Arts & Humanities,"
    and


    African-American Studies
    ;










  • Help on the Ground II:

    Student government


    President Utsav Gupta [
    Email
    him
    ] 


    exploited the situation


    by illegally shutting down all student media until the
    student government overrode him and by seeking



    to institute illegal rules

    which would have permanently silenced all student media
    that was not anti-Western, with himself the arbiter. If
    a report that



    "Gupta said he is working with UCSD legal counsel"

    is true, Gupta also feloniously conspired with the UCSD
    administration to violate white students` civil rights;











  • Help on the Ground III:

    Chancellor Fox exploited the situation by illegally
    "investigating"
    perfectly lawful behavior by white students, and by
    entering into negotiations with, and



    signing an agreement with the BSU,

    that violated the California Constitution and white
    students` Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Her
    administration conspired to cover up the true nature of
    the incidents by manipulating the UCSD Police
    Department, and withholding information. Instead of
    investigating the BSU students for possible race hoaxes
    and conspiracy to commit extortion, and arresting them
    for trespassing and vandalism, Fox praised them. She
    seeks to impose a joint Fox-BSU dictatorship on the
    school;












  • Help on the Ground IV:

    San Diego



    City Attorney Jan Goldsmith
      [Email
    him
    ]
    refused to release the name, race, or ethnicity of



    the confessed noose-hanger
    .









As a veteran Hate Crime watcher, this naturally aroused
my suspicions. But on March 31, CA Goldsmith`s
communications director, Gina Coburn, e-mailed me:


"In regards to your inquiry on the recent incidents at
the University of California San Diego, the case having
to do with a noose found in the library remains open and
is under active investigation. We cannot comment for
that reason."

Coburn [Email
her
]
repeated her claim, during an April 1 telephone
conversation, that the case was still
"under investigation," adding,
"we are in the process of reviewing the case." When I interjected,
"reviewing, but
not investigating?"
she switched to
"it`s an
investigation and a review of the case."

I pointed out to her that the UCSD PD had completed the
investigation, and handed over its case file and
evidence to the City Attorney`s office on March 2.
Coburn acknowledged that, but stayed on message.

I retorted, "I`ve never
heard of a case where a white suspect was alleged to
have committed a hate crime, in which his name was
suppressed. Ever."

Apparently, City Attorney Goldsmith does not believe that the Hate
Crime law applies to non-whites. His illegal suppression
of the confessed noose-hanger`s name was, I believe,
part of a strategy to
"disappear"
the crime. The legal term for that is
"conspiracy to
obstruct justice."



Another political prosecutor
. What a

surprise
!


Campus Civil Liberties, R.I.P.

In mid-February,
Chancellor Fox announced that she was investigating, and
looking to discipline white fraternity members who, she
said, had advertised the "Compton
Cookout."
But as the Foundation of Individual Rights
in Education`s (FIRE) Director of Legal and Public
Advocacy,


Will Creeley, pointed out



in a February 23 letter to Fox, for her even to
"investigate,"
much less discipline the fraternities, would violate
their constitutional rights.

In a


February 22 letter

to Gupta and Fox, Adam Kissel,
the director of FIRE`s Individual Rights Defense
Program, argued that Gupta`s actions in shutting down
student media were
"unconstitutional
and morally questionable."

After FIRE`s Creeley and
Kissel, and David Blair-Loy, the legal director of the
ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties, notified
Chancellor Fox that she was violating the law, she
ignored them (and UCSD spokesman Rex Graham declined to
respond to them), but quietly removed her threats.

However, whites on
campus still do not know their rights. At this point, it
will likely require the UCSD administration losing a
multimillion-dollar lawsuit, to change how it does
business.

Thus far, no individual
or group has announced plans to file such a suit, and
Creeley told me that FIRE does not engage in litigation.

On


February 22
,
23 (
PDF),
and 24 (
PDF),
the ACLU`s Blair-Loy wrote variously to Chancellor Fox
and student government president Utsav Gupta, pointing
out that they were violating students` First Amendment
rights.

But those letters were
contradicted, and thus neutralized, by a



February 25

letter from



Andrea Guerrero
,
the policy & field director of the same ACLU branch, and
a longtime, embittered foe of Prop. 209, heartily
supporting Fox` illegal, racist, anti-civil liberties
campaign, and offering the ACLU`s help, in implementing
it!

In March, despite
leaving detailed voice and e-mail messages at the ACLU`s
national media office in New York, and speaking with
someone there named
"Pam" about
the UCSD and Mizzou cases, I never got a response.

But that was not
surprising. In February, I had asked
"Pam" for a
statement regarding the terrorist threats that had
caused four hotels in a row to cancel their bookings for
the




American Renaissance

conference
.
She never responded the either.

Blair-Loy
notwithstanding, the



ACLU


is not a



civil liberties organization
.
In line with its



founding by a Communist,

it is a civil
rights
a.k.a. civil privileges organization. It
supports



"Racial Justice"
and


"[Illegal] Immigrants` Rights,"
i.e., it seeks to disenfranchise and dispossess America`s white
majority.

The knowledge that the
"
Compton
Cookout
" was the work of a black comedian, whose stage name is


Jigaboo Jones
,
and that the noose was probably hung by a
"minority
student,"
had no effect on the black students,
Chancellor Fox or, for that matter, the media.

But say that white
students had indeed committed the acts in question—save
for the noose:
They weren`t crimes anyway!

 Only the noose
was illegal, due to



an unconstitutional state law

that blacks had demanded, and that the race
hoax-mongering (
here and


here
)
NAACP had sponsored (
PDF),
following a wave of black noose hoaxes—do I detect a
pattern here? And that was only a misdemeanor.

Conversely, virtually
all of



the black students` 32 demands

were illegal. They entail giving unqualified black
students and personnel huge sums of money, admissions,
and jobs, based solely on the color of their skin, in
violation of the California Constitution and the
Fourteenth Amendment; instituting



segregation


(a "safe space"
for black students), in violation of historic Supreme
Court precedents; and violating white students` First,
Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights.

Though the Black Student
Union avoided directly antagonizing Asian students, its
demands also violated


most of the same rights regarding
Asians
.

The BSU depicted UCSD—where white-on-black crime is virtually
non-existent—as a place where blacks are unsafe, and
where vague "racial tension" rules, which the
administration must somehow cause to disappear.

The UCSD Police
Department, which has jurisdiction for all on-campus
matters, is supposed to be a professional, independent
police agency, but on March 11, I learned otherwise.
When I asked to speak with a Department public
information officer, I was transferred to Rex Graham, [
Email
him
]
at UCSD Communications and Public Affairs. The interview
consisted of my asking one question after another, and
Graham refusing to answer me.

Graham claimed that he
couldn`t so much as tell me the race or ethnicity of the
noose-hanger. But according to the booklet,




Covering Campus Crime

published by the Student Press Law Center (who can`t
help their



initials
),
that was untrue. No law prohibited him from giving me
that information. More importantly, since the perp has
now confessed to committing a crime, UCSD is legally
obligated to release her name and other information
about her.

If UCSD is hiding the
name of a confessed criminal—even if the law in question
is obscene and unconstitutional, and the crime only a
misdemeanor—UCSD is, at the very least,


violating the federal Clery Act
,
and at worst, engaged in a felonious conspiracy to
obstruct justice. Chancellor Marye Anne Fox [
Email
her
]
should at least be fired, and at worst be arrested and
prosecuted.

When I asked Graham
whether Chancellor Fox would be meeting with



white student group leaders

to parallel her announced regular meetings with the BSU,
he



did not even understand the question.

UCSD Chancellor Fox`
talk of


"
horrific acts of hate"
expresses both her pomposity and lack of any moral compass. Truly
"horrific acts of hate"
would entail carnage such as
the crimes against academics that I linked to earlier,
or the

racially-motivated atrocities that blacks regularly
commit

against non-academic whites.

Nevertheless, the UCSD
race hoaxes were so successful that on March 24



the UC Board of Regents "apologized"

for the (non-existent) white hate crimes against black
students, and proposed reintroducing affirmative action
at UCSD (which it already did last year at UC Berkeley
and UCLA), via the euphemism
"holistic review"
of applications. Someone will have to sue the Regents,
in order to stop their illegal actions.

If Chancellor Fox is not stopped from acceding to the black students`
illegal demands, she will turn UCSD into a diversitopia.


Footnote:
UCSD`s handling of a May 10 incident dispelled any last doubt that
Fox had any principles, as opposed to leftwing
loyalties.

During the Q&A following
a David


Horowitz
speech, an Arab Muslim coed named


Jumanah Imad Albahri



made the mistake of trying to intimidate him.
He turned the tables on her, and in a Perry Mason
moment, got her to admit,



on camera,

that she supports genocide against all Jews, worldwide.

UCSD`s response was
underwhelming. Albahri lied, in insisting that her
remark did not represent her true beliefs, and made a
non-apology-apology condemning Horowitz. Even though the
entire exchange had been captured on camera,



the administration gave her a pass
.


 Radical Muslims
are part of the multicultural alliance; thus the UCSD
administration sees them as allies, whereas it sees
white, heterosexual, Christian men—unless they wage war
on their own—as enemies.

The role of Jews on the
multicultural campus is presently ambiguous.

Jews who


embrace genocidal anti-Semitism


(parallel to white gentiles like



Jane Elliott

and



Tim Wise
,
who embrace genocidal anti-white racism) are assured of
privilege. Other Jews who are not anti-Semitic,



e.g., those at Berkeley
,
are demanding a seat at the multicultural cannibals`
feast. Jews who do not fit into either of the
aforementioned groups are in trouble.


Identity "Crimes"

Normally law enforcement
authorities typically
start with a
crime, and then investigate said crime, in order to
hopefully determine the identities of the perpetrators,
and to arrest and prosecute the latter. But that isn`t
the way things typically work when police say that they
are
"investigating a possible bias crime."
In such
cases, either:



  • No crime was committed, but police are seeking to
    intimidate whites (but never blacks) out of
    exercising their legal rights;




  • No crime was committed, but



    the authorities seek to find, arrest, prosecute, and
    imprison a white
    , simply because he exercised his legal rights in a manner that they
    don`t like; or





  • As in the UCSD noose case, a statute (which may be
    unconstitutional) may have been violated, but the
    authorities will only arrest and railroad someone
    (e.g., a white, Christian, male heterosexual) not
    from an unconstitutionally
    "protected
    class."


Present at the Creation: Columbia University`s Hallowed Black
Racist Traditions

The modern academic race
hoax movement began at Columbia University in March
1987. As I wrote in my January 2007



VDARE.com

exposé on the Duke Rape Hoax
:


"In three separate attacks, a mob of seven young black men—students
and non-students—beat up a total of five white Columbia
University men students.


"Following a by now



dog-eared script
, a group called Concerned Black Students at Columbia (CBSC),
represented by



"activist attorney"
C. Vernon Mason, claimed that "a mob of white students had kicked
and stomped a single black student and then went on a
rampage shouting, `We`re going to kill you f——g n——s!`"


"Although 22 witnesses had already contradicted the black
attackers` claims, the latter were never arrested, and
indeed, demanded that their white victims be arrested.


"When CBSC held



mini-riots
, in which as many as 50 supporters, black and white alike, were
arrested, protesting "against racial violence" and
against the failure of the


NYPD

to follow their demand that police arrest the white
victims, Columbia responded by promising more
affirmative action in



admissions
and faculty hiring.


"The Columbia race hoax received months-long saturation coverage by
the national media; once the hoax was exposed, the media
went silent.


"Black students at six other East Coast university campuses,
including Duke, were inspired to take over campus
buildings. In each case, the black students decried
"resurgent

[white] racism" on campus
and demanded and got concessions from the institution in
question in the form of expanded affirmative action for
black student applicants and professors.


"There was a campus racism problem, alright, but it was that of
resurgent black racism."

(Mason had just come off
staging the



Howard Beach Hoax with his accomplices Al Sharpton and
Alton Maddox
; later that year, the trio would promote the


Tawana Brawley Hoax
.

Mason was later disbarred for misconduct and neglect
regarding 20 different clients. Maddox was suspended indefinitely
from practicing law for refusing to cooperate with an
investigation into his conduct during the Brawley hoax.)

But institutional racism
was now entrenched at Columbia:




  • In 1993
    ,
    a black security guard managed to get three white
    man undergraduates who worked for the school escort
    service fired, based on a fake
    "racism"
    charge;


(An escort service for students means a


guard service

that walks them from place to place late at night, to
keep them safe, not what it means for adults like, say
Eliot Spitzer. Q: Why is this service necessary
for Columbia University? A: because it`s located near



Harlem
.)


  • Around the same time, a black Columbia Law student claimed, without
    a shred of evidence, that a third-year, white man
    classmate, a devout Catholic, had made an obscene
    telephone call to her late at night. Columbia`s
    counsel turned the burden of proof upside down,
    making the impossible demand that the man prove that
    he was not
    guilty. Only when the white man`s lawyer threatened
    to sue Columbia did the school drop its persecution
    campaign.
    [Diversity at Columbia U.: When
    "Chocolate"
    and "Vanilla"
    are Fighting Words
    (
    PDF)
    by Jeffrey M. Duban,
    Heterodoxy,
    January 1995.].



  • Fast forward to October, 2007. When


    Madonna Constantine
    ,
    a black affirmative action hire who was a tenured
    full professor (see



    here
    ,



    here (PDF)
    ,
    and


    here
    ) of multicultural counseling psychology at Columbia`s Teachers
    College, learned through her department sources that



    she was about to be fired

    for having engaged in serial plagiarism and other
    misconduct,



    a noose appeared on her office door
    .


Although the case reeked of a hoax from the get-go, it
received credulous, nationwide, saturation publicity
(even from
"rightwing"



Fox News
),
and of course, inspired



campus protests against "racism."

Though no one cited any
laws that had been broken, the



NYPD Hate Crimes Task Force


and three different DOJ agencies investigated. The MSM
promoted the myth that white racists had been planting
nooses all over the country. The evildoer was never
brought to justice.

When Columbia finally
fired Constantine in August, 2008, she asserted that she
was the victim of a racist conspiracy,
"structural
racism,"
and an
"academic
lynching,"



and sued Teacher`s College for $200 million
.
(The suit is pending.)

If anything, there was a
conspiracy in
support of
Constantine.

Meanwhile, as always,
black criminals habitually target white and Asian
Columbia students and personnel with



robberies and burglaries
;
assault and battery (including



gang assaults
);



rape and attempted murder
;
and



murder



(also



here
).

And yet, none of these
black attacks, as opposed to the black race hoaxes, has
ever issued in



rallies
,
"bias crime" charges, public denunciations by law enforcement or
colleges, or saturation coverage by the MSM.



Fred Reed


recently


defined


affirmative action as
"the calculated
recruitment of incompetence."
But since the myth of
white discrimination against blacks is the entire
rationale for Affirmative Action, multiculturalism
requires constant race hoaxes in order to generate its
talking points.



Affirmative Action

has always been inseparable from the project of
expanding racial power bases. Little work is expected of
AA hires,


leaving them



ample leisure for making racist mischief
.
In addition to hiring racist black professors to fill
departments of pseudo-scholarship, universities hire
racist black counselors and officials to staff the
bureaucratic underworld (e.g.,
"Student Life",
the office that


"investigated"

white UCSD fraternity members). FIRE`s founders,
historian Alan Charles Kors and



lawyer Harvey J. Silverglate
, dubbed this
"the Shadow University"

in their eponymous, landmark book. Over the past 20
years or more, administrations have ruthlessly reduced
their proportions of full-time faculty,


while



massively expanding their hiring


of the highly-paid, full-time
"Shadow
University"
personnel, who promote racial
intimidation (e.g.,



"sensitivity training"
).
This group benefits directly from Hoax Crimes


Diversity or University, That is the Question

One of the central
experiences of higher education is coming into contact
with ideas one disagrees with. White students know this
experience in spades. Conversely, however, black and
Hispanic students are simply provided with an echo
chamber for their own prejudices. And now, though they
break no laws, whites who criticize or mock those
prejudices face arrest.

For all of the talk of
its enriching qualities, college
"diversity"
almost always means the admission of black and Hispanic
students and staff who are cognitively and morally unfit
for college life.

The demand by UCSD`s
black students, like black students elsewhere, that all
campus whites be forced to submit to their will, was the
expression of their moral unfitness to function in a
university setting. They insist that the university be
transformed into



the antiversity
:


Jim Snow U
.

That they are not
expelled and arrested for their crimes, is evidence that
the white bureaucrats running schools like UCSD and
Columbia are likewise morally unfit for college life

Do we surrender to this
savage new reality—or, in



Jon Voight`s


words,

"
Save
America as we knew it"
?


Nicholas Stix [email

him] lives in New York City, which he
views from the perspective of its public
transport system, experienced in his
career as an educator. His weekly column
appears at


Men`s News Daily

and many other Web sites. He has also
written for Middle American News, the
New York

Daily News,
New York Post, Newsday,
Chronicles, Ideas on Liberty
and the
Weekly Standard. He
maintains two blogs:

A
Different Drummer
 and

Nicholas Stix, Uncensored
.