Earlier this month, on August 11,
the San Francisco Board of Supervisors
unanimously passed a resolution demanding the FCC
investigate the relationship between "hate speech in
and hate crimes. Amnestied
illegal alien-turned-City Supervisor
David Campos was the most vocal sponsor of the
It was always
obvious that the Obama Administration`s
hysteria is actually aimed at
repressing opinion. But what is
According to the San Francisco
August 11 resolution, it is words
offend" some group. This is
not limited to
advocating violence—but also specifies
"creating a climate of hate towards vulnerable groups".
Francisco resolution quotes various studies by
the National Hispanic Media Coalition about an alleged
rise in hate crimes against Latinos and how this is tied
"hate speech" in
the media. (More on this later.)
Who are these
groups"? Guess what—they aren`t
Protestants. But they do include
Asian-Pacific Americans, Latinos, Muslims, Jews,
Lesbians, Gays, Transgendered people, and people
But, most of all, the Board of
Supervisors is concerned with the
coverage of Latinos and the immigration debate".
They breathlessly repeat the
debunked claims of the
UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center and the
National Hispanic Media Coalition
correlation exists between an increase in hate speech in
the media and an increase of hate crimes committed
against vulnerable groups".
How big an epidemic is hate-speech
related violence in San Francisco? According to the
San Francisco Police Department`s own statistics, a
grand total of no (0) anti-Mexican Hate Crime in
2008 and one (1) in
The SFPD does not say exactly what type of crime these
were, but given the hissy fit the city is throwing over
hate crimes, it`s a safe bet if they were murder,
serious assault, we`d hear about it.
While few hate crimes occur in San
Francisco, plenty of crimes occur due to criminal
illegal aliens. Yet in 1989, San Francisco passed a
sanctuary city policy
"prohibits city employees from helping Immigration and
Customs Enforcement (ICE) with immigration
investigations or arrests unless such help is required
by federal or state law or a warrant".
Many cities try to hide their
sanctuary policies, but in early 2008 San Francisco
actually lunched an ad
campaign to let all illegal aliens know they have
nothing to worry about. A spokesman for city mayor Gavin
"We have worked with the Board of Supervisors,
Department of Public Health, labor and immigrant rights
groups to create a city government-wide public awareness
campaign so that immigrants know The City won`t target
them for using city services."
had a long criminal record, including two felonious
assaults—one against a pregnant woman. Less than three
months before the murder he was arrested on gang and
weapons charges. But he was neither charged nor reported
to immigration authorities.
One of the
most outrageous aspects of the city`s system was that it
specifically protected known illegal alien drug dealers
from deportation. Last June, the
"San Francisco juvenile probation officials—citing the city`s immigrant
sanctuary status—are protecting
youths caught dealing crack cocaine from possible
federal deportation and have given some offenders a
city-paid flight home with carte blanche to return."
probe S.F.`s migrant-offender shield, By Jaxon Van Derbeken, June 29, 2008]
Narcotics Unit Captain Tim Hettrich was quoted as
saying that illegal alien drug dealers
off as juveniles, with a three-day growth of beard and
everything else. It`s frustrating, some of them have
been arrested four or five times…That is one of the big
problems with being a city of sanctuary."
One of these
illegal aliens was Alexander Izaguirre who stole Amanda
Kiefer`s car, and then tried to run her over with it,
and fractured her skull last year.
only recently discovered that Izaguirre had been
arrested for dealing crack cocaine just four months
earlier. But the city put him on its
"back on track"
helped give him a job (which it is
illegal in and of itself) and expunged his record.
they`ve committed crimes and they`re not citizens, then
why are they here? Why haven`t they been deported?"
Francisco D.A.`s program trained illegal immigrants for
jobs they couldn`t legally hold
By Michael Finnegan,
Los Angeles Times,
June 22, 2009]
after Kiefer`s case, the San Francisco District Attorney
who runs the program,
Indian-Jamaican California AG wannabe
Kamala Harris, still
defends it, saying that, save for Izaguirre, all the
other illegal aliens whose records were expunged were
rules" and deserved to be let free even after
prosecutors found out about their status.
spate of negative publicity over the murders, San
Francisco revised its policy so city officials can
report illegal aliens who commit felonies.
Campos—the same supervisor who sponsored the Hate Speech
former teenage illegal alien himself—wants to
create an exception to allow juvenile illegal alien
felons to avoid deportation.
have protected the Bolognas` killer, Edward Ramos, who
was arrested for two felonies at the age of 17.
It gets even better. The City of
San Francisco is not the first entity to ask the FCC to
speech". On January 28, The National Hispanic Media
sent it a
"Petition of Inquiry…In the Matter of Hate Speech in the
The NHMC seems to be the driving
force behind Campos` crusade against Hate Speech. It is
cited in four parts of the resolution. In fact, the
language and definition of hate speech (words like
"vulnerable group", "climate
of hatred") come straight out of the
"National Latino Policy & Issues Brief"
on Hate Speech and Hate Crimes by the UCLA Chicano
Studies Research Center and the NHMC. It takes a very
broad definition of hate speech to include words like
aliens". In fact, it specifically
cites criticism of San Francisco`s sanctuary policy
as an example (links added):
Analyst of Hate
Speech from The
John & Ken Show
Vulnerable group: foreign nationals (undocumented people).
Social institutions: policy and political organizations (city policy and
The sanctuary policy preceded Gavin Newsom`s tenure as San Francisco`s
mayor, and neither Newsom nor the sanctuary policy
supports "letting underage illegal alien criminals
Guilt by association is used to make the hosts` point. Undocumented
youth and those who are perceived as their endorsers at
the institutional level are stigmatized by being
associated with criminality.
DIVISIVE LANGUAGE Criminalized undocumented youth and their perceived
validators (Gavin Newsom and the
sanctuary policy) are depicted as a threat to San
Francisco citizens, setting up an "us versus them"
The language depicts the hosts` targets (undocumented people, city
policy, and Mayor Gavin Newsom) as dangerous, criminal,
and collusive, in addition, the focus of that policy
(undocumented people) becomes reduced to "underage
illegal alien criminals."
This is self
evidently absurd, but now that using flawed reasoning in
opposition to illegal immigration is considered hate
speech, I`ll briefly dispense with this nonsense lest I
be accused of a
people" is, of course a politically correct
euphemism for illegal aliens. If they are a
group", then so are thieves, con artists, and
Illegal alien criminals
is a redundancy and San Francisco`s policy explicitly
calls for letting illegal aliens loose; so that is Gavin
Newsom`s policy. I guess the NHMC thinks
“criminal illegal aliens” means those who also committed other
crimes; and being let
not actually putting them through the justice system.
But the fact that if illegal aliens, after they are
tried for their local crimes, are not reported to
federal immigration officials. That is letting them
ipso facto criminals, so associating them with
isn`t guilt by association; as they all are criminals.
Criticizing an elected official`s policies
illegal aliens isn`t
association" unless you are accusing the mayor of
being an illegal alien himself.
And it`s a bit of
a pot-kettle-black thing for the NHMC to accuse others
of "guilt by
If using the words
"illegal aliens" and
"criminal illegal aliens" is divisive, then ICE
officials in the Obama administration
As for us vs. them,
pretty much all politics pits different interest groups
against each other. If John and Ken are guilty then San
Francisco is putting the progressive right-minded
thinkers and the underclass "us" against
be laughable—if it weren`t parroted by politicians and
the Main Stream Media. This is not limited to the
People`s Republic of San Francisco. For example, Sen.
Robert Menendez, (D, NJ)
the same request to the FCC as San Francisco. Even
made the phony argument on the campaign trail.
hypocrisy demonstrates just exactly what the real agenda
behind the cries against
about protecting Hispanics and immigrants from
It`s about protecting
Treason Lobby politicians like David Campos from
criticism for their failure to defend American citizens
from illegal aliens—and, ultimately, it`s about a
totalitarian drive to suppress all patriotic dissent.
"Washington Watcher" [email
him] is an anonymous source Inside The