Martin Luther King Day: The Rise Of The New Feudalism

As time passes, the

controversy
once associated with

Martin Luther King Day
fades. People who remember
the controversy die, and new generations are only
thankful for the

three-day holiday.
Eventually, people may forget why
the holiday is celebrated.

King was a brave and courageous person. I agree with
him that a person should be judged by the content of his
character and not by the color of his skin. To those who
stress King`s loose sexual morals, I reply that sin is
that for which we ask God`s forgiveness.

My problem with Martin Luther King Day is that it
celebrates a civil rights revolution that achieved the
opposite of King`s intention. Today we are judged by the
color of our skin.

This conclusion is inescapable wherever we look.
Those with darker skins have become

“preferred minorities”
with rights to
employment, promotions, training programs, university
admissions, and federal contracts that are greater than
those of “whites.”

New crimes known as hate
crimes
are being created that only “whites”
can commit and only “preferred minorities” can
suffer. If a “white” assaults a “black,”
the charge will be

assault and a hate crime
. If a

“black” assaults a “white,”
the charge
is

only assault.

“Preferred minorities” have special rights to
be offended that “whites” do not have. Indeed, a
“white” who offends a “black,” whether
intentionally or

unintentionally
, can be charged with racial
discrimination or with a hate crime.

Preferred minorities can

call whites names
, but whites cannot call preferred
minorities names.

Ordinary language has become a minefield for whites,
who must

tiptoe
around, aware that the slightest mishap can
bring a lawsuit or destroy a career.

These persecutions happen in the name of
“diversity,”
but diversity suffers. There can be
black fraternities and organizations, but not white
ones. Southern cultural symbols, together with all
symbols of the South`s defense of states` rights, are
headed down the memory hole. Is there never to be an end
to Reconstruction?

Whites are demonized in movies, theater,

rap lyrics
, and school textbooks.

Christopher Columbus
and the American Founding
Fathers have been

reduced
to evil racists who practiced

white male European hegemony
over minorities and
women. Any

textbook author
who described preferred minorities
in comparable language would be

driven from academic life
.

Was there ever a time when whites were taught to
judge blacks by the color of their skin? Many people

may have had prejudices
that produced a similar
result, but blacks were not demonized.

If we insist that blacks were demonized, how is it an
improvement to demonize whites? Today, blacks are taught
skin color judgments, just as feminists teach gender
judgments, and communists teach class judgments. Whites
are taught the same skin color judgments, which explains
the

predominance
of

“white guilt.”

The great paradox of the civil rights revolution is
that instead of enforcing and expanding equality before
the law, the revolution created differential rights
based on race, gender, and, any day now, sexual
orientation. The great liberal revolution, centuries in
the making, that brought forth equality in law, has been
overthrown. In its place we see rising a new feudal
legal order of status-based rights.


Lawrence Stratton
and I documented the rise of the

new feudalism
in complete detail in our book,

The New Color Line
. Not a word of refutation of
our account has ever appeared. Americans have accepted
the overthrow of liberalism. As the new feudal order
arises, strife will be its handmaiden.

What would Martin Luther King do if he were alive
today? Would he endorse redistributive “racial
justice,”
which means the

end of limited government
and the death of legal
equality, or would he come to the defense of equality
before the law?

Martin Luther King knew that

legal equality
was the promise of the American
compact. Those who take his name in vain assume that
they will always be the ones who determine the
boundaries of discord.

But the evisceration of legal equality overturns the
promise of liberty.

In the wake of liberty`s demise will follow evil,
plunder, and violence.

COPYRIGHT CREATORS
SYNDICATE, INC.

Paul
Craig Roberts was Associate Editor of the WSJ editorial
page, 1978-80, and columnist for “Political Economy.”
During 1981-82 he was Assistant Secretary of the
Treasury for Economic Policy. He is the author of



Supply-Side Revolution: An Insider`s Account of
Policymaking in Washington
.