How California`s GOP Immigration Patriots Can Survive 2010`s Mid-Term Elections


Of all the thousands of readers` letters that
I have read and
edited
for posting, one sticks with me the most.

California resident

Bob Turley wrote
that he was so angry at the dereliction of
duty by his elected officials that he hopes the state falls into
the Pacific Ocean—after he moves out.

I remember
Turley`s
letter
so well because I shared his sentiments. At the time,
I had not yet
fled my native California.

By November 2010, Turley may get his wish—symbolically, if in
no other form.

The

California Republican Party
, the only wall of resistance
left to the immigration invasion that has overwhelmed the state,
is on the verge of complete insignificance. Analysts believe
that the few Republican U.S. Representatives that remain may
lose their seats in the upcoming general election.

Given the fundamental weaknesses of the GOP
gubernatorial candidate
Meg
Whitman
and U.S. Senate contender
Carly
Fiorina
who will oppose

Barbara Boxer
, Republican troubles are much greater than
trying to win those key elections.

As a practical matter,
victory in the top races is out of reach. 
Therefore, the Republicans most urgent concern is not to
lose further ground in the Congressional races. But because of
the erosion of the Republican base, Democrats are hopeful that
they can sweep all 53 seats in the nation`s most gerrymandered,
least competitive (in Senate and presidential races) state.

Republicans don`t have a majority of
registered voters in a single congressional or

legislative district
. Democrats, by contrast, hold a
majority in 20 of the state`s 53 congressional districts,
according to the

secretary of state`s March 20 voter report
. (The math
explained: Democrats have a majority—50 percent +1— in 20
Districts, Republicans don`t have more than 50 percent in any
district, and in the remaining 33 districts neither party holds
a majority.)

These latest registration figures show
Republicans in California at a historic low of 32.3 percent.
While Democrats are gaining voters in key districts, Republican
voters are in many cases reregistering as

Independent
or “decline-to-state” [California
Dems Outpace Republicans in Voter Registration
, by Edwin
Garcia, San Jose Mercury News, October 21, 2008]

Tony
Quinn
, a veteran GOP analyst and co-author of the
California Target
Book
which conducted extensive voter registration
surveys, found that, statewide, a general collapse of new
Republican registrations has taken place. 
And David
Gilliard
, another GOP pollster who organized the 2003
successful drive
to recall
then-Governor Gray Davis
, confirmed Quinn`s findings when he
recently remarked that the party has been down and out for a
long time.

While the drift away from the Republican Party has been in
progress for years, two recent developments have escalated the
trend:

Accordingly, the Democrats smell blood and sense that as many
as eight Republican-held House districts that Barack Obama won
in November may be up for grabs.

Our long-time adversary, Democratic Party
Chairman
Art Torres
told POLITICO.COM: 
“We need to look at all those congressional districts
where we think we may have a shot.”
And Democratic
Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Chris Van Hollen
recently confirmed that his party would be going for the kill.
Said Van Hollen: “California is a place that we will be
looking at this time around even more closely than before.”

[GOP
Withering Away in California Heat?
by Alex Isenstadt,
Politico.Com
, April 14, 2009]

Among the most vulnerable Republican Congressional seats are:


  • Elton
    Gallegly
    (Immigration
    Grade: A
    ) His Santa Barbara-area district has seen the
    Republican registration edge over Democrats drop from 11 percent
    in 2002 to 6 percent in 2009.

     

  • Mary Bono
    Mack
    (Grade:
    A-)
    . Her district`s GOP edge decreased from 11 percent to 4
    percent. Bono Mack faces the prospect of a tough reelection
    challenge from Palm Springs Mayor Steve Pougnet. (Grade:
    A-)

     

  • Howard
    “Buck” McKeon`s (Grade:
    A
    ). In his Santa Clarita Valley-area district the Republican
    registration margin has dropped from 9 percent to 1 percent. As
    a result, McKeon has experienced a corresponding decline in his
    reelection percentage, gradually shrinking from 65 percent in
    2002 to 58 percent in 2008.



     
  • Dan Lungren
    (Grade:
    A
    ), whose Sacramento-area district`s GOP registration edge
    fell from 11 percent to 2 percent over the past seven years, was
    held to under 50 percent of the vote by Bill Durston, an
    underfunded and unknown anti-war challenger in 2008.






     


  • Ken
    Calvert`s (Grade:
    A
    ) His Riverside County seat has slipped from 16 percent to
    7 percent GOP registered. In 2008, Calvert narrowly defeated
    Bill Hedrick, a largely unknown opponent.

What`s boxed the GOP in is that

California`s demographics
have dramatically changed over the
last two decades. As more Hispanic and Asian voters become
politically involved, Republicans haven`t been able to draw up a
winning game plan that appeals to them—or, more importantly,
compensate by
rallying their white base,
what we at
VDARE.COM call
The
Sailer Strategy
.

Thus in the 2008 Presidential election, CNN
exit polls

show
that John McCain actually succeeded in losing the
California white vote (a.k.a. what until recently would have
been regarded as the American vote) 46%-52%. (McCain couldn`t
even carry white men in California: he got 48% vs. 44% for white
women). 

In
contrast,
McCain

swept
the Alabama white vote, which is almost exactly the
same proportion of the total as in California, 88%-10%. So he
carried the state easily, 61%-39%.

Furthermore, in California the GOP has consistently nominated

unattractive candidates
who are predestined to lose either
because they avoid mentioning immigration altogether—a comically
idiotic strategy in California—or they can`t effectively sell
the message that
more
immigration
is bad for everyone, especially recent
immigrants
.

Rightly or wrongly, new immigrant voters in
California consider Republicans
the enemy.
In politics, perception is reality.

Still, a faint glimmer of hope remains. Some
of the targeted districts like Lungren`s and Calvert`s are
strongly conservative. If they didn`t lose to their Democratic
challengers in 2008 when

Obama-mania
swept through California, they may not do it in
2010, especially if and when the president`s popularity slips.

More significantly, California has an amazing
record for re-electing incumbents. In 2008, every single
incumbent in the State Senate, State Assembly and Congress won
overwhelmingly. (See official results

here
.)

The challenge for Republicans is both easy and hard.

Identifying the right platform is simple.
Immigration is California`s number one social issue. You don`t
have be a genius to see the inverse relationship between
continuing higher levels of uncontrolled immigration and the
state`s deteriorating quality of life as witnessed in
schools,
health
care
,
urban sprawl
, etc ad infinitum.

I believe that`s a winning argument. But to present it
effectively to a Democratic, immigrant-dominated state
Republicans will need a well-known, well-funded candidate who
has the courage of his convictions.

Most Republican strategists encourage their
candidates to “appeal” to immigrants` interests—a big
mistake because what they really mean is pander to them.

But
Republicans can`t outdo Democrats
when it comes to

immigration pandering
. Just ask
John McCain.

Republicans only recourse is to drive home the
message that for the collective good of all Californians,
immigration in all its forms—legal,
illegal
and
non-immigrant visas
—has to end.

The beauty of that platform is that it will
make sense to

enlightened immigrants
—that is,

English-speaking citizens
who are registered to vote.

Still, it`s a tough sell, made harder by the
hour`s lateness and the decades of

immigration folly
shown by Republicans.

But for prospective Republican office seekers, in Margaret Thatcher`s
famous words, There Is No
Alternative
.

Joe Guzzardi
[email
him]
is a California native
who recently fled the state because of over-immigration,
over-population and a rapidly deteriorating quality of life. He
has moved to Pittsburgh, PA where the air is clean and the
growth rate stable.
A
long-time instructor in English at the Lodi Adult School,
Guzzardi has been writing a weekly column since 1988. It
currently appears in the


Lodi News-Sentinel.