January 22, 2005
Enrichment, Displacement, And The Vindaloo Visa
By David Wilson
[Previously by David Wilson:
Anti-Immigration Protestor Hits
GOP Convention—Guess What Happens?]
Opponents of mass
immigration, when not hit with nastier charges,
sometimes find themselves on the defensive about their
supposed lack of cultural open-mindedness.
They are accused of being
grouchy, close-minded troglodytes who, in the lyrics of
country singer Allan Jackson, can't tell
"the difference in Iraq and Iran”—dumb, doughy
whites from the red states too culturally backward to
appreciate the joys of the foreign - the folks
Michael Moore can't wait to see disappear.
(Look at number 8 from the
17 reasons not to slit your
wrists
over the defeat of
John Kerry on
Michael Moore’s website:
“88% of Bush's support came from white voters. In 50
years, America will no longer have a white majority.
Hey, 50 years isn't such a long time! If you're ten
years old and reading this your golden years will be
truly golden and you will be well cared for in your old
age.”
(And they call us "haters"?)
Immigration in all forms is
allegedly an injection of the serum of life into a
moribund—usually
white—corpse. [Click
here for an
American version of this argument;
here for a
Scottish version].
Inevitably, an immigration
enthusiast will trot out anecdotes confirming his
cosmopolitan superiority:
The clever
Iranian exchange student he hosted. The
Salvadoran family sponsored by his church whose
mother made delicious tamales for the culturally
deprived folks in Omaha. Etc., etc.
These would-be
culture-stimulators miss a whopping point: When a
critical mass of an
alien culture descends, it doesn't enrich—it
displaces.
Exploration and
cultural experimentation are sharply distinct from,
and often at cross-purposes with, what we are seeing in
the United States and Europe now.
Transplanting entire
Mexican barrios across the border isn't going to
enrich us, because the barrio is big enough to be
self-enclosed.
Miguel need not interact with you because he can—and
does—interact with Julio instead.
And why shouldn't he? He's
got
Spanish everywhere he turns right here in the United
States.
On every
telephone help line I call, I wait patiently while
the Espanol option is provided. What number do I
press to get my
country back?
One of the great delusions of
the multicultural crowd is that immigrant eagerness to
come to the United States is driven by some heroic
desire to fill Americans with cultural thrills.
So eager in fact, they'll zip
their kids into - and I'm not being ethnically
insensitive this time -
piñatas
to get here.
Of course immigrants want to
"make a better life for themselves." So do bank
robbers. Should we be impressed?
What about the immigrant who
is willing to
commit the crimes Americans aren't willing to
commit?
Here is a case in point from New York:
In 2002 Jose Hernandez, a 29
year-old illegal alien, and four of his illegal alien
friends, attacked and raped a woman in Queens, New York.
Last year, after the usual
delay, the five men were sentenced to prison terms of
roughly twenty years a piece. [New
Beginnings, Tragic Endings Mark 2004 by Paul
Menchaca,
Queens Chronicle,
12/30/04]
This was the exchange between
the judge and Mr. Hernandez.
“‘Please forgive me
because I don't want any more time here,’ Jose Hernandez
said through an interpreter. ‘I have family back in
Mexico. My father passed away, and who is going to take
care of my wife and my child?’
“‘Mr. Hernandez, [the victim] had family and
loved ones as well,’ Kew Gardens Supreme Court Justice
Randall Eng shot back.” [PARK
RAPE FIEND GETS 22 YEARS by Scott Shifrel, New
York Daily News,
Mar 25, 2004]
Funny, I must have missed Jose
Hernandez’s
Soho gallery opening.
Immigration enthusiasts more
culturally open-minded?
In reality, the opposite is
true.
Cultures aren't preserved by
mass immigration; they're destroyed by it. For cultures
to thrive and bear fruit, they need quiet, calm and
isolation —literally like cultures in a Petri dish.
Medici Florence,
Mozart's Vienna and the
Ireland that bore
Joyce,
Shaw and
Yeats were hardly the multiracial war zones of the
Western world today.
By today's standards, I
suppose they would count as hotbeds of xenophobia in
desperate need of de-homogenizing.
Yet the myths of cultural
enrichment persist. As
Steve Sailer has noted, the American elite equates
immigration with cute little ethnic restaurants—not the
crowding,
economic pressure and
culture clashes experienced by those who live
closer to the ground.
Indian food in Manhattan? I
love the stuff myself. And I know how important it is
to our ruling class. So I have a proposal:
After
cutting off mass immigration,
Congress could enact a "Vindaloo Visa" for a
select number of foreigners who promise to set up cute
little
ethnic restaurants—should the
cute-little-ethnic-restaurant quotient drop to
dangerously low levels.
The spicy stuff can be
imported. It is our culture here that needs preserving.
David
Wilson
[E-mail
him] is a freelance
writer in New York City.