July 12, 2007
Has Microsoft Found A “Temporary Worker” Loophole
In Canada?
By
Rob Sanchez
Bill Gates has been threatening to move Microsoft
out of the United States unless Congress authorized more
H-1B visas—for (allegedly)
temporary workers. His blackmail strategy didn't work
because Congress didn't give him the H-1Bs he
demanded.
Now Gates is
reportedly making good on his threat by moving a
Microsoft division to Canada. Gates hates losing so,
now he is throwing a hissy fit.
Microsoft's
announced move is a brilliant PR ploy. News articles are
appearing all over the country proclaiming that the
Microsoft move is
proof positive we need more H-1B visas.
The amusing thing
is that, despite the scare mongering over a shortage of
H-1B visas, Microsoft has actually admitted it would
have moved even if H-1B immigration was increased:
"Microsoft spokesman
Lou Gellos said that while the immigration issue was a
factor, the company would be opening the center in
Vancouver even if it were not for the immigration
challenges.”
[Microsoft
sings 'O Canada' amid immigration challenges By
Ina Fried and Anne Broache, CNET News.com]
But you would never
know what Microsoft said if you read the Los Angeles
Times and
other papers who think the move to Canada is
proof positive that the sky is falling:
"High-tech companies
are so frustrated by the limits on visas for skilled
labor that they're not just opening offices in
India and China to recruit
local talent. They're also putting facilities in
places like Vancouver for prized recruits
from around the world—many of them trained at U.S.
universities—who cannot work here. "[Microsoft
moves north, July 10, 2007]
Reuters actually
had a similar quote from Lou Gellos. But right up at the
top of the article, you still get the impression that a
lack of
H-1B visas is causing a mass exodus:
“It may signal the
start of a new hiring trend, with other U.S. high-tech
firms following in Microsoft's footsteps to Canada,
where lawyers say it is easier for foreign nationals to
obtain work credentials…”
[Microsoft
expands in Canada amid U.S. visa crunch By Jim
Finkle and Allan Dowd, Reuters, July 5, 2007]
You gotta like this
one—an immigration lawyer calls Microsoft's actions a
fulfillment of a “promise”. It would be far more
honest to say Microsoft is making good on its threat to
blackmail the American middle class.
"Microsoft and other
companies have been saying for a long time, 'If you make
it so difficult for U.S. companies to bring in talented
foreign national that they need, companies are going to
fill those positions abroad,'" said
Ted Ruthizer,
[send
him mail] who runs the
business immigration practice for the U.S. law firm
Kramer Levin Naftalis and Frankel.
"This is just the
fulfillment of this promise," Ruthizer said.
I have several
thoughts on the Microsoft move.
Thought #1: Microsoft's move is
more of a problem for Canada than for us. As
Microsoft imports large numbers of foreign workers into
Canada, then the resultant problems they cause with
unemployment and
overpopulation are Canada's, not ours. Canada makes
it very easy for foreign workers to immigrate. As this
CTV article explains, Canada has no limit on the
number of employment visas. So it's no surprise that
Microsoft is slobbering over the prospect of importing a
vast new pool of
cheap labor.
Thought #2:
There is a common belief that
Washington State in particular and the U.S. in
general will lose jobs because of Microsoft's move.
There is hysteria that other companies will follow suit.
But what none of
the news articles mention is the fact that if Bill Gates
would have gotten his H-1B visa increase,
Microsoft would be hiring foreign workers—not
Americans. It makes no difference to
Americans whether foreigners are employed in Canada
or whether the H-1Bs are allowed to work in
Microsoft—the jobs are lost either way.
Thought #3:
There may be more to the Microsoft move than meets the
eye—which of course means that the only one who will see
what's going on is me (and of course all of you who are
savvy enough to read
VDARE.COM or
subscribe to my newsletter!).
The Canadian
Microsoft plant in Vancouver is a two hour drive away
from its
Redmond campus. It will be very easy for Microsoft
to obtain
TN (Trade NAFTA) visas for anyone it wants to
transfer between the two locations. Basically the
Canadian location is a
backdoor into the U.S.—which allows Microsoft to
escape the
H-1B cap. TN visas will allow Bill Gates to thumb
his nose at us.
TN visas are
unlimited. So Microsoft will have no problem moving
as many people as it wants to the U.S.
I have been warning
for years that the
TN visa is a time bomb. But very few people seem to
appreciate how this visa can be used to transfer people
between Mexico, Canada, and the U.S.
Thank NAFTA. As far
as NAFTA is concerned, moving people across the Canadian
border or cars across the Mexican border is nothing more
than the movement of commodities.
Lou Dobbs has
already
reported that the Chinese are going to use NAFTA to
sell cars in the USA by building them in Mexico and then
exporting them to the U.S.
And since
Canada allows dual citizenship, it would be very
easy for an Indian national, for example, to get
Canadian citizenship and then legally obtain a TN visa.
How screwed up is that?
Canada makes it
very easy for foreign workers to
become naturalized citizens. It's also very quick
and easy to get a visa in Canada that's similar to an
H-1B.
"The Canadian
government has specific programs for quickly bringing
high-tech workers with certain skills into the country,
a process that can take two to eight weeks, said Evan
Green, an immigration attorney and partner at
Toronto-based law firm
Green & Spiegel."[Canada
seeks foreign workers, by Patrick Thibodeau,
Computerworld, July 11 2007]
This statement
makes it even clearer:
"Sergio
Karas, an immigration attorney based in Canada, also
believes Microsoft's move to Canada is in reaction to
U.S. immigration policy.’ This move by Microsoft is H-1B
driven. There is no cap in Canada. Depending on the
country of origin, we usually prepare an application,
and in three weeks, a person can be working here,' said
Karas." [Microsoft
takes a big step to near-shoring in Canada
Ephraim Schwartz, Infoworld, July 9, 2007]
Canada even has an
organization that rivals our
ITAA—it's called Information and Communications
Technology Council (ICTC).
Quoted in the Computerworld article cited above,
the president of the ICTC, Paul Swinwood, [send
him mail] sounds just like the
ex-president of the ITAA,
Harris Miller:
"[Canada] has been
basically built by immigration. We're a country that
looks at immigration as part of our natural birthright
and the supply of the growth of the country."
Our H-1B policy is
downright sane compared to Canada’s fast track to
unlimited numbers of work visas.
But will Canada’s “temporary” immigrant workers
now be coming here?
Thought #4:
Corporate blackmail like this latest from Microsoft can
be stopped—but only when we as a nation refuse to allow
the "faith
based" economists to force
free trade down our throats.
If our country had
the backbone to put heavy trade tariffs on corporate
misfits like Microsoft, it wouldn't be economical for
them to continue to export our jobs.
And it goes without
saying that eliminating corporate welfare programs like
H-1B would help save jobs for Americans.
Of course, the
"free trade" ideologues in our government won't
allow this anytime soon. And the voters are not informed
about the
damage that is happening on a daily basis to our economy—so
nothing changes.
One thing we don't
want to do is to award companies by expanding the H-1B
visa program. Kissing Bill Gates rear end by increasing
H-1B means that the displacement of American workers
will be perpetuated.
Whenever you see a
Congressman
groveling on his or her knees to Gates, pull them
back up on their feet, and slap them until they start
acting like American patriots!
Rob Sanchez (email
him) is a Senior Writing Fellow for
Californians for Population Stabilization
and author of the "Job Destruction Newsletter" (sign up for it
here) at
www.JobDestruction.com.