One common argument: Hispanics
gravitate to
risky occupations—“jobs
natives don’t want to do”—and this, rather than
problems with English, might explain their above average
workplace mortality rates.
But this notion is belied by
government statistics.
Take the meatpacking industry,
widely regarded as the
province of Hispanic immigrants willing to work in
conditions unacceptable to native workers. Federal
data show not only that whites are well represented in
this industry, but also that they perform the same
tasks more safely than Hispanics.
Ditto for the
construction and manufacturing industries.
[Table 3.]
A lack of
English proficiency is also cited as a major cause
of higher death rates among Hispanic workers. The Bush
Administration has responded with a $2 million dollar
OSHA program designed to train non-English speaking
workers—whether here
legally or not—in job-safety techniques.
This problem is not going away
soon. Over the years, billions have been spent teaching
English to Hispanic immigrants. Yet, as we point out in
an
earlier article, the share of Hispanic immigrants
that is “linguistically isolated,” i.e., speak
English poorly or not at all, is increasing. Even
simple English language instructions are
incomprehensible to the “linguistically isolated.”
Can
OSHA succeed where the
educational establishment failed?
[Number fans
click here for tables.]
Edwin S. Rubenstein (email
him) is President of
ESR Research Economic Consultants in Indianapolis.