July 09, 2007 National Data, By Edwin S. RubensteinLinda Chavez Stops Smearing, Substitutes Statistics. It Doesn’t WorkAt a critical point in the recent amnesty war, Linda Chavez got so excited that she extended her usual smear that opposition to immigration is racism to virtually the entire Conservative Establishment. Not surprisingly, she subsequently felt obliged to apologize, sort of, in a long National Review Online exchange. But Chavez still squabbled with Heather MacDonald on the data— or “factoids”, as Chavez has described data she doesn’t like—regarding criminality and educational achievement of Hispanic immigrants. Crime Chavez: “I’m not sure what more I can say about MacDonald’s assertion, ‘In Los Angeles, 95 percent of all outstanding warrants for homicide (which total 1,200 to 1,500) target illegal aliens. Up to two-thirds of all fugitive felony warrants (17,000) are for illegal aliens.’ The police don’t collect information on the immigration status of those wanted for crimes—period…If she had done her homework, she could have found statistics on Los Angeles that support her contention that Hispanics are committing more than their share of crimes (though it would not support her contention that illegal aliens are involved in most of these). For example, in May 2002, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (see below for an explanation of the database) reports that of 36 defendants charged (not convicted) with murder, 24 were Hispanics—roughly two thirds in a county whose population is about half Hispanic; but blacks were charged with a third of murders, though they represent just under 10 percent of the population.” [Linda Chavez on Immigration, Conservatives & Hispanics on National Review Online] Mac Donald: “It [the figures for illegal aliens wanted for murder] was given to me by a source in the Los Angeles Police Department’s Fugitive Warrants Section and I stand by it… I’m not surprised that the press office of the LAPD won’t confirm the LAPD data; the department’s leadership is one of the most politically correct in the country, having for decades embraced a sanctuary policy that has resulted in a virtual cordon sanitaire between officers on the street and federal immigration authorities.” An NRO Symposium on Conservatives & Hispanics on National Review Online VDARE.COM: Of course, the real question is why the LAPD doesn’t collect data on immigration status. And Linda Chavez’s attempt to correct matters with Bureau of Justice Statistics murder stats, although forcing her to acknowledge Hispanic criminality, just doesn’t go far enough. The BJS figures are based on a small sample of one month’s felonies. More importantly, they often fail to note Hispanic ethnicity when designating an arrestee’s race. Chavez could have turned to the comprehensive, and more up-to-date, crime figures for LA County available at the California Department of Justice website. They show a total of 727 persons were arrested for murder in LA County in 2005 (the latest available year), allocated among demographic categories as follows: (Table 1.)
It is not unreasonable to expect illegals to flee the country at greater rates than others after committing murder—or any other crime—so this confirms that idea that the Hispanic half of LA’s population is committing up to two-thirds of the crime. Needless to say, the data reflect that arrests are not disaggregated by nativity or legal status. But disproportionate criminality among illegal aliens is apparent when comparing their population share to their prisoner share. FAIR’s Director of Special Projects, Jack Martin—in a study of the 13 states with illegal alien populations above 100,000—estimates that illegals account for 6.4 percent of incarcerations versus 4.9 percent of the adult population. [FAIR—Illegal Immigration and Crime Incidence] In other words, illegals are 31 percent more likely to be incarcerated than the average adult. States with the highest rates of alien criminality were as follows:
Illegal aliens account for 11.8 percent—i.e., more than one in nine—of California’s total prison population. That’s some 44 percent higher than their share of California’s overall population. Education MacDonald:
“….
[She]
doesn’t like my
skepticism towards
Michael Gerson’s claim that Hispanic culture is
‘focused on education.’ Here are some other targets that
Chavez had better start going after: Chavez: “She continues to argue that half of all Hispanics in the U.S. drop out—going so far as to quote the Chicano Studies Research and Faculty Center at UCLA to prove her point—let me try once again to explain the fallacy. Virtually any statistic about the Hispanic population that does not disaggregate the foreign-born from the U.S.-born will overstate achievement for the foreign-born, while understating it for the U.S.-born, because one out of every two adult Hispanics was born outside the U.S. When it comes to education, the aggregate calculations are particularly off base.” VDARE.COM: Chavez is right: failure to separate foreign-born from U.S.-born Hispanics does distort their dropout rate picture. But even when nativity is taken into account, Hispanics drop out at far greater rates than non-Hispanics. The following data is from the U.S. Department of Education:
The dropout rate for foreign-born Hispanics (44.2%) is six-times that of foreign-born non-Hispanics—but even U.S.-born first generation Hispanics are more likely to drop out than their non-Hispanic first generation immigrant counterparts. More troubling still is the fact that second generation Hispanic youths have higher dropout rates than first generation Hispanics. Bottom line: by encouraging Hispanic immigration, we are importing a troubled population. Mac Donald is right, Chavez is wrong. Expect her to go back to smearing. Edwin S. Rubenstein (email him) is President of ESR Research Economic Consultants in Indianapolis. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
