May 17, 2007
Immigrants Already Displacing Americans At Record
Rate—Even Before Senate Sellout
The Bush White House and the Senate leadership
returned to their the
vomit today, essentially reviving last year's
Bush-Kennedy Immigration Acceleration Act,
As it happens, even without any help from the Senate,
just released tables from the Bureau of Labor Statistics
show that the number of foreign born persons working in
the U.S. increased nearly 6 percent in 2006.
Not since 2002, when
post 9/11 security measures prompted many temporary
and seasonal workers to stay in the country rather than
risk apprehension at the border, has the immigrant
workforce grown so rapidly.
(Table 1.)
From 2000 to 2006 the foreign-born workforce grew by
5.3 million, or 31 percent. Over the same period the
number of U.S.-born workers rose by 3.9 million, or 3.3
percent. About 57 of every 100 jobs
created during these six years went to an immigrant.
In 2006 immigrants
accounted for 15.4 percent of total employment, up from
14.8 percent the prior year. As recently as
2000 only 12.5 percent of U.S. workers was foreign
born.
Should immigrant and
native job growth continue at the pace of 2000-2006, the
immigrant share of U.S. employment will exceed 50
percent by mid-century, as seen in the table:
Immigrants represent a
large and rapidly growing share of workers lacking basic
educational skills. In 2006 some 47 percent of
all adult workers with less than a High School diploma
were foreign born. From 2000 to 2006 the number of
immigrant high school dropouts rose by 35 percent, while
the number of native born dropouts shrank by 12
percent.
(Table 2.)
This probably
underestimates
the true dropout rate for immigrants. Many are
counted as high school graduates if they completed
school in their country of origin—regardless of the
local standards.
Yet the unemployment rate
for foreign born dropouts in 2006 was 5.1 percent,
considerably below the 8.2 percent rate for U.S.-born
dropouts.
Talk about displacement!
In fact, the immigrant
workforce is increasingly bi-modal, i.e.,
overrepresented at the
top, as well as the
bottom, of the educational spectrum. From 2000 to
2006 the number of immigrants with a bachelor’s degree
or better grew by 40 percent versus 14 percent growth in
U.S.-born degree holders over the same period.
The unemployment rate of
college-educated foreign born—2.3 percent in 2006 - was
unchanged from 2000. By contrast, U.S.-born college
grads were more likely to be unemployed in 2006 (2.0
percent) than at the start of the decade (1.6 percent.)
It’s trendy, and
apparently politically acceptable, to blame outsourcing
for the nagging unemployment problem among
college-educated Americans. A
frequently cited study by economic consultants
Forrester Research [November
11, 2002]says 3.3 million white-collar jobs will be
lost to foreign outsourcing in the next 12 years.
That’s an average of 275,000 jobs lost per year.
But in 2006 alone 399,000
foreign-born college graduates (FBCGs) entered the
labor force. Since 2000 we’ve absorbed 1.8 million FBCGs.
(See
Table 2.) The influx must inevitably displace
Americans in the short run, whatever its long-term
benefits. And it’s accelerating.
Unemployment isn’t the
entire story. There is also underemployment—as reflected
in falling real wages of displaced
native-born workers. Displaced natives may find work
in other fields, but usually at far lower pay levels.
The negative effect occurs regardless of whether the
immigrant workers are
legal or
illegal,
temporary or permanent,
educated or
uneducated.
Harvard economist George
Borjas finds that immigration reduces the average wages
of native born high school dropouts by 7.4 percent.
Native born college graduates suffered a 3.6 percent
loss in wage due to competition from immigrants with
similar levels of education.[
Increasing the Supply of Labor Through Immigration
Measuring the Impact on Native-born Workers May 2004]
Borjas’ estimates are
based on immigration through the year 2000. Today the
foreign-born share of dropouts is 28 percent higher, and
the
college-educated share is larger by 19 percent.
The immigrant share of the
workforce—and the resulting wage losses—will rise
without limit, at least if the Bush administration has
its way.
Edwin S. Rubenstein (email
him) is President of
ESR Research Economic Consultants in Indianapolis.