November 02, 2006
Chinese "Contract Labor" And Canada’s Immigration
Catastrophe
My
recent article on Chinese "contract labor"
being brought in for post-Katrina rebuilding inspired a
Canadian reader
to recount his country’s experience. Dan Murray, of
Immigration Watch Canada, writes:
"I was particularly
interested in your article because I have done a
considerable amount of research on the Chinese Head Tax
issue in Canada. You may wonder what the connection is.
To put the matter briefly, the Chinese Head Tax (and
eventually Canada's Chinese Exclusion Act) were
responses to
Chinese contractors (mostly Chinese businessmen
already in Canada) bringing
cheap Chinese labor to Canada. This created an
enormous amount of hostility which has been glossed over
by the media today (most of whom know nothing about the
history) as being rooted in racism. The central point is
that economic factors such as underbidding for jobs
caused much of the hostility against the Chinese."
[e-mail to Ed Rubenstein, October 10, 2006]
The Canadian government was under extreme pressure to
cut costs incurred in constructing the country’s first
transcontinental railroad in the 1880s, and cheap
Chinese labor was seen as crucial. At its peak, about
one-third of
British Columbia’s labor force was Chinese.
When Canadian workers complained about unfair
competition from the low-wage Chinese, the response of
the Canadian government was familiar:
"….When Prime
Minister John A. Macdonald heard complaints about the
unfair wage advantage the Chinese enjoyed, he repeatedly
(but likely inaccurately) pointed out that Canada had
allowed Chinese laborers to enter the country solely
because there was a shortage of labor in the early
1880's. The Chinese, he said, would be leaving when
construction had been completed. B.C. laborers should
just be patient…" [
April
5, 2006: Some Conclusions About The Chinese Head Tax and
Chinese Exclusion Laws, ImmigrationWatchCanada.org]
Of course, the Chinese influx continued even after the
railroad was built. This prompted the first
Chinese Head Tax, a fixed fee levied on each Chinese
immigrant, set at $50 in 1885. Subsequent
Administrations increased the tax to $100, and in 1904,
to $500. (For five hundred dollars in the early 1900s
was enough to purchase two homes in Montreal.)
Yet even this high level of tax did not restrain Chinese
immigration. From January 1904, when the tax was
increased to $500, until the passage of the Chinese
Exclusion Act of 1923, 42,444 Chinese paid the Head Tax
to come to Canada. In the prior 18 years (1885 to 1903)
39,925 Chinese paid the Head Tax. [
Chinese
Head Tax Issue Speech to the 12th AGM of the
National Congress of Chinese Canadians, Senator Vivienne
Poy]
How could they afford it? The answer, of course, is that
the tax wasn’t paid by the laborers themselves, but by
their contractors a.k.a.
gangmasters—who "loaned" them the tax
payments in return for their indentured servitude.
"Later, to have workers repay their debts, they
collected pay from employers and then deducted an
appropriate amount each pay day from each laborer’s
wages," Murray writes.
The
Chinese Immigration Act of 1923, which
barred Chinese immigration, was the only recourse.
Fast forward to 2006.
Canada currently admits about 250,000 legal immigrants
annually, or approximately
83 per every 10,000 residents. By comparison, the
U.S. is almost xenophobic: we admitted
1.12 million legal immigrants in 2005, or roughly 38
per every 10,000 Americans. On a per capita basis,
Canadian immigration is the highest in the world.
Most Canadian immigrants come from
China (still),
India, the
Philippines, and
other Asian countries. Dan Murray informs us that
many of the recent arrivals have been sponsored by
false refugee claimants who arrived earlier and were
granted refugee status. In effect,
illegal immigrants are driving much of the current
legal influx to Canada.
So what is the Canadian government doing re immigration?
On
June 22, 2006 Prime Minister Stephen Harper formally
apologized to Chinese immigrants for the
country’s treatment of Chinese immigrants between
1885 and 1923. Harper pledged
financial restitution.
(This despite being
allegedly influenced, while a student,
by Peter Brimelow’s book on Canada! And, for the
record, this is what Brimelow’s
Alien Nation reports is the
response if you ask how you can go about immigrating
to China today:
Chinese Embassy
Official [laughs]: "China does not accept any
immigrants. We have a large enough population. A
foreigner can visit on a tourist visa that can be
extended for up to six months. Then you must leave. To
apply for a temporary work permit, you must first have
an official letter of invitation from a company
authorized by the Chinese government.")
Chinese-Canadian groups expect the Canadian
government will offer a multi-million-dollar
compensation package to survivors who paid the Head Tax,
their widows and their children.
An update from Dan Murray:
"By the way, just
heard a news item about
a talk our Prime Minister gave to a group in
Vancouver's Chinatown last night. [PM
addresses Head Tax and lauds accomplishments of Chinese
Canadians] He told a sentimental story about his
wife's connection to the issue and then said that
compensation checks for the Chinese Head Tax would
be in the mail by November of this year. I believe he
knows nothing about the economic reasons for the Head
Tax and does not want to hear anything that might
disturb his sleep."
[e-mail to Ed
Rubenstein, October 11, 2006.]
Edwin S. Rubenstein (email
him) is President of
ESR Research Economic Consultants in Indianapolis.