January 26, 2006
No-one’s
Suggesting Mass Deportation—But It
Would Pay For Itself
A recent study questions whether
deporting illegal immigrants would be worth the cost.
Deporting the Undocumented: A Cost Assessment,
[PDF]
was published by the Center for American Progress, a
liberal think-tank. It’s touted as the first-ever
estimate of costs associated with apprehending,
detaining, prosecuting, and removing immigrants who
have
entered the United States illegally or overstayed
their visas.
The cost of mass deportation
according to CAP: $206 billion over five years
($41.2 billion per year). This study assumes that about
10 million illegals would be subject to deportation and
2 million would leave voluntarily if a
mass deportation program was announced.
But $206 billion is an absurdly
large figure. The largest chunk of it is apprehension
costs ($141 billion). In arriving at this figure,
researchers blithely assumed that the
historical, abysmally low, deportee apprehension
rates would continue under a mass deportation regime:
“We extrapolate from the available evidence to
provide an estimate of the per-apprehension cost. In
1999, 240 agents apprehended 2,849 unauthorized workers,
and, as noted above, 90 agents apprehended 445
unauthorized workers in 2003. Assuming a typical annual
cost of $175,714 per agent, and after summing the number
of apprehensions (3,294) and agents (330), the average
apprehension cost comes to $17,603. Assuming a 20%
voluntary departure rate, the total costs for
apprehending 8,000,000 undocumented immigrants would be
$141 billion over five years.”
Ten deportees per agent per year
is the apprehension rate the researchers used in
estimating the cost of apprehending 8 million illegals.
Ten per year! You can find more illegals in front of
Wal-Mart in a single afternoon.
But even if $206 billion was a
reasonable cost estimate,
mass deportation would be
well worth it. Just consider the economic burden
illegal aliens impose on the rest of us:
Federal Deficit:
The average illegal alien household receives $2,736 more
Federal services than it pays in taxes. (See
Table 1.)
Since there are at least 3.8 million such households,
the total drain on the federal budget is about $10.3
billion. [Steven A. Camarota, “The
High Cost of Cheap Labor: Illegal Immigration and the
Federal Budget,” CIS, August 2004]
These are conservative estimates.
CIS assumes, for example, an illegal immigrant
population of 8.7 million (the official Census Bureau
figure) versus 10 million assumed in the deportation
study. VDARE.COM’s D.A. King, later
supported by other researchers [PDF]
puts the illegal alien population
as high as 20 million.
State and local deficits:
The comprehensive immigration study sponsored by the
National Research Council [The
New Americans: Economic, Demographic, and Fiscal
Effects of Immigration, 1997] examined the
fiscal impact of
immigrants in California. While it did not
explicitly compare illegal and legal immigrants, the NRC
research staff found that the average immigrant
household generated $3,823 more state and local spending
than it paid in state and local taxes. (See
Table 2.)
Using California as a proxy for the national average, I
estimate that illegal aliens increase state and local
deficits by about $15 billion annually.
American worker
displacement effects: There are roughly 7
million illegal immigrants working in the U.S. – about
3.5 percent of the labor force. Each 1 percent rise in
U.S. labor force due to immigration reduces native-born
wages by about 0.35 percent, according to George Borjas.
[PDF]
It follows, then, that
illegal immigrant workers reduce wages of
U.S.-born workers by approximately 1.2 percent
(3.5X0.35).
If
politicians don’t care, they should. Assuming
native-born federal, state, and local tax payments fall
by the same percent, native workers cough up $26 billion
less taxes due to unfair competition from illegal alien
workers.
Total fiscal
benefits of deportation are thus estimated at $51
billion per year—$25 billion in deficit reduction and
$26 billion in foregone displacement losses.
At this
rate, mass deportation would pay for itself in about
four years.
Plus, of
course, we’d get America back.
Edwin S. Rubenstein (email
him) is President of
ESR Research Economic Consultants in Indianapolis.