November 22, 2005
California Importing
Poverty Faster Than Any Other State—Guess Who Gets To
Pay To Fix It
California’s per capita real
(inflation-adjusted) income will fall 11 percent over
the next two decades if current demographic and
educational trends continue. The decline will be larger
than that of any other state, and more than 5-times the
two percent decline in per capita income projected for
the nation, according to a just released study by the
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
[As
America Becomes More Diverse: The Impact of State
Higher Education Inequality, November 2005]
Never in U.S. history has per
capita real income declined over a two-decade span. But
then again, never have
American demographics been so impacted by an influx
of
unskilled minority workers.
The share of
California’s labor force consisting of whites is
expected to fall to 39 percent in 2020; it had been 71
percent as recently as
1980. California’s growth is almost completely
within the Hispanic population, whose workforce share is
expected to jump from 16 percent in 1980 to 38 percent
in 2020. Immigration is the primary driver.
Per capita real income is being
dragged down because, amazingly, public policy is to
import poverty—and
all its problems.
You might think
restrictive immigration policy is a no brainer given
these projections. It would
postpone, if not reverse, the projected declines in
per capita income.
But you would think wrong. The
National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education
is a think tank supported by the
Student Loan Marketing Association’s foundation. Not
surprisingly, it
proposes increasing aid to
low income and
minority students to close the
education gap between whites and minorities.
That’s a tall order for any state,
especially California. Among the state’s working-age
adults, about 52 percent of Hispanics do not have a
high school degree, compared to 8 percent of whites.
At the other end of the educational
spectrum only 12 percent of the state’s adult Hispanics
have a college degree compared to 46 percent of
adult whites.
Both gaps are larger and have grown
faster in California than in other states.
In a perfect world, states could
raise minority college enrollments while leaving white
rates unchanged. But the world, alas, is far from
perfect. As the The National Center for Public Policy
and Higher Education report itself says (page 34 [PDF]),
“With
the
federal budget deficit at an all-time high and
states
struggling to fund growth in the least discretionary
components of their budgets….the outlook for increased
student aid to
low-income families and minorities is grim. Under
these circumstances, it is increasingly important that
state grant aid programs are carefully targeted at
those who
need it most and who would not attend postsecondary
education without it.”
Translation: California, like other
cash strapped states, will have to finance education aid
increases for immigrant minorities by
reducing such funds for
native-born whites.
This makes curtailing mass
immigration even more vital.
Ask the National Center for Public Policy and Higher
Education why this didn’t occur to it.
Edwin S. Rubenstein (email
him) is President of
ESR Research Economic Consultants in Indianapolis.