October 03, 2005
Federal Data
Confirms: New Orleans Nightmare Was Predictable
Despite the best efforts of Steve
Sailer and the
analysis in the recently-released
The Color of Crime, the role of race in
post-Katrina America is still unmentionable. Any race or
ethnicity, given the chance, would have looted, raped,
and murdered. Or so the PC crowd would have us believe.
Obviously, we cannot conduct a
controlled experiment, inundating other cities and
observing the result. But the correlation between the
black proportion of the population in
large U.S. cities and their
rates of violent crime is depressingly obvious in
data collected by the Federal government.
In Table 1, I rank large cities
(population 500,000 and above) on their crime rates as
reported by local authorities to the FBI. Black
population shares and violent crime rates per 100,000
inhabitants for representative cities are as follows:
Los Angeles, the
ninth most dangerous city, was
far less Black than others in the top ten—but
(hmmm!) it had more than three times their
Hispanic population share.
New Orleans is another anomaly, but
for a very different reason. Although the city is 67
percent Black, its violent crime rate—976 per 100,000
population—is, while high, actually below each of the10
"most dangerous" cities.
Perhaps the best explanation was
that reported by an Australian journalist days after
Katrina hit: [John Harlow, “Poverty
rules in crime capital of the South – KATRINA’S
WAKE,” The Australian, September 5, 2005.]
“The
New Orleans Police Department –
long accused of corruption – claimed it was cleaning
up its act, but in an extraordinary admission last week
the FBI said any improvement in the city’s grim crime
statistics could have been due to people taking the law
into their own hands.
“FBI
special agent
James Bernazzani told reporters: 'There is a
community perception that the state judicial system has
failed. And when that perception, true or not, becomes
ingrained, then a second judicial system kicks in –
street revenge.'”
Implication: New Orleans’
official violent crime rate is low because victims
see no point in
reporting occurrences to a
dysfunctional police department.
Murder may be the one crime deemed important enough
to report—even in the
Big Easy. At 57.7 homicides per 100,000 population,
NO’s murder rate is more than twice the average for the
ten “most dangerous” cities (24 per 100,000
population).
Murder rates have declined in most
U.S. cities; they are still rising in New Orleans.
Race is not the only factor
predisposing a community to violent crime. Poverty,
educational levels, the distribution of income, even
population density, are all relevant variables.
But even after adjusting for these
other factors, the data undeniably shows that
Blacks are more
violence-prone than other groups.
FEMA should not have been
surprised.
Edwin S. Rubenstein (email
him) is President of
ESR Research Economic Consultants in Indianapolis.