|
August 04, 2005
Born in the U.S.A……to
(illegal?) immigrants
For decades immigration has been
the
driving force behind
U.S. population growth. Although the foreign
influx continues, the new arrivals are now
outnumbered by
babies born to immigrant mothers.
Births to immigrant mothers have
quadrupled over the past three decades: [Table1, below.]
 | 228,486 in 1970 ( 6.1 percent
of all births) |
 | 339,662 in 1980 (9.4 percent
of all births) |
 | 621,442 in 1990 (14.9 percent
of all births) |
 | 915,800 in 2002 (22.7 percent
of all births) |
Even in 1910—the
peak of the
Great Wave—only 21.9 percent of births were to
foreign-born mothers, according to the Center for
Immigration Studies’
recent report on immigrant births.
Of course, back then the native
birth rate was much higher than it is today, while
immigration was poised to decline—first as a result of
World War I, and later due to the moratorium.
Illegal immigration was a rarity—a situation generally
conducive to assimilation.
Not so today. Births to illegal
alien mothers—AKA
"anchor babies"—accounted for a whopping 42 percent
of all immigrant births in 2002. That may sound high
until you consider that illegals account for at least
one-quarter of the total foreign-born population and a
still larger share of foreign-born females in the prime
child-bearing years, 18 to 39. Moreover, their
fertility rate—average number of births per mother of
childbearing age—is higher than that of legal
immigrants.
VDare.com readers are
painfully aware of the Constitutional accident
caused by the bizarre
14th Amendment misinterpretation, which
confers American citizenship on
anyone born in the U.S.—no matter what the legal
status of the parents. Every day
pregnant Mexicans take cabs to U.S.-border hospitals
for the express purpose of
giving birth to a U.S. citizen. But the anchor baby
craze is no longer limited to border states.
Anchor babies account for 45
percent or more of all immigrant births in 12 states:
 | Arizona, 56.4 percent |
 | New Mexico, 55.1 percent |
 | Texas, 54.5 percent |
 | Arkansas, 51.0 percent |
 | Colorado, 51.0 percent |
 | Nevada, 50.1 percent |
 | North Carolina, 48.8 percent |
 | Nebraska, 48.2 percent |
 | Oklahoma, 47.8 percent |
 | Idaho, 47.8 percent |
 | California, 47.7 percent |
 | Kansas, 46.1 percent |
In fact, these percentages probably
understate the anchor baby phenomenon. Regulations in
federal law require all medical facilities and
physicians to treat information on a patient’s
"immigration status" as confidential.
Local sanctuary laws add another layer of
opaqueness to the anchor baby count.
As U.S. citizens, anchor babies can
stay permanently, can prevent a parent’s deportation,
and when they become adults, can petition to have their
illegal alien parent become a naturalized U.S. citizen.
In this Alice in Wonderland world today’s illegal
immigrants could eventually account for a
larger share of the legal foreign-born population
than today’s legal immigrants.
A modest proposal to President
Bush: Make the 14th Amendment the "litmus
test" for
Supreme Court candidate John Roberts. It directly
affects far more Americans than
abortion or
gay rights.
VDARE.com note: As any
parent of young children knows, the arrival of babies is
a tremendous financial disaster – whatever the overall
benefits. The fact that immigrants are altering their
behavior so rapidly testifies to how much more welcoming
the authorities have made the environment for them –
largely, of course, at the expense of the American
people.
Edwin S. Rubenstein (email
him) is President of
ESR Research Economic Consultants in Indianapolis. |
|