April 02, 2005
March Employment Data Shows Dramatic Displacement Of American Workers
On Friday, the
Household Survey of employment reported a
whopping 357,000 new jobs in March.
(The Payroll Survey once again
reported less growth. This systematic difference baffles
Wall Street economists. We
argue it reflects illegal immigration, which of
course they never consider.)
The Household Survey, unlike the
Payroll Survey, reports ethnicity. More than half of
those new jobs created in March went to Hispanics.
Hispanics account for just 13.1% of total employment—but
they received 60% of the
new jobs.
The Hispanic unemployment rate fell
by 0.7 percent in March. White unemployment fell by 0.2
percent.
Because so many Hispanics are immigrants and the
children of immigrants,
Hispanic employment is the best proxy we have for
the impact of immigration on employment. The ratio of
Hispanic to non-Hispanic employment growth is a strong
indication of how immigrants have fared relative to
native-born workers in a particular month.
In this case, an even more dramatic
story lies behind the numbers.
White unemployment fell in part because a smaller
fraction of the white population was in the labor force,
i.e., either working or looking for work, in March.
Hispanic unemployment rates fell
despite the fact that a larger share of the Hispanic
population was in the labor force that month.
Implication: White workers are
increasingly
discouraged, and are likely being
displaced by Hispanic workers.
March is an extreme case. Rarely
have the job experiences of Hispanics and non-Hispanics
departed so radically.
But the March data reflects a
pattern that has prevailed throughout the
Bush Administration. We track it with the
VDARE.COM American Worker Displacement Index (VDAWDI).
From the start of the Bush
Administration in January 2001 through March 2005:

The graph demonstrates the
situation starkly. The black line is Hispanic job
growth; pink is non-Hispanic; and yellow the ratio of
Hispanic to non-Hispanic (VDAWDI.)
VDAWDI—the ratio of Hispanic to non-Hispanic job indexes—rose to 114.0
(=114.3/100.3) in March, up from a revised 112.8 in
February.
A week ago, the Pew Hispanic Center
reported that the
illegal immigrant presence has increased an
astonishing 23 per cent since
George W. Bush assumed office.
I have earlier
documented the simultaneous drop in the enforcement
of the
employer sanctions legislated in 1986 to discourage
illegal immigration.
Maybe Bush is trying to tell us
something?
Edwin S. Rubenstein (email
him) is President of
ESR Research Economic Consultants in Indianapolis.