Paul Craig Roberts on the
GOP and the White Vote
By Paul Craig Roberts
As we
enter the second decade since the demise of the Soviet
Union as a political entity, Soviet propaganda is as
influential as ever. Indeed, Soviet propaganda will
influence the success or failure of the new Bush
administration and could even ultimately decide the
fate of the two-century-old "American
experiment."
In the struggle for world influence, Soviet propagandists
realized that non-Soviet whites were a small minority
of the world's population occupying a small part of
the earth's landmass (Europe and North America). In
their propaganda, the Soviets undertook to isolate the
Western alliance from what today we call "people
of color."
Europe was attacked for imperialism toward its
African and Asian colonies. The United States was
attacked for denying civil rights to blacks.
Soviet propaganda was amazingly successful. The
charge that the West was racist became enshrined in
European and British universities and foreign
ministries. Many a professor made a career declaiming
his country's mistreatment of darker skinned peoples.
In the United States, this propaganda is the
loudest voice in our universities. There are more
academics teaching the evils of white racist hegemony
than there are teaching physics, chemistry or
mathematics. Our Founding Fathers, along with white
men in general, have been reinvented as racist pigs.
This propaganda has succeeded among blacks and
whites alike. The majority of black leaders believe
that black interests and white interests are opposed
and irreconcilable, requiring preferences for racial
minorities "to level the playing field."
In response to the charge of racism, white
policymakers have put in place a system of
unconstitutional racial preferences that have expanded
to include other "victim" groups. These
preferences have destroyed equality by granting
status-based legal privileges to "victims of
white male hegemony."
To be accused of racism has become a serious
offense, and people are punished for "hate
speech" and "hate thought."
Paradoxically, Republicans have been branded the
"racist party" -- despite the facts that
Republicans, led by Sen. Everett Dirksen, broke the
filibuster against the 1964 Civil Rights Bill and the
Nixon administration imposed the first racial quotas.
In the recent presidential election, 90 percent
of blacks and two-thirds of Hispanics voted against
the Republican candidate, George W. Bush, despite his
sincere outreach. Sensitive to the charge of racism,
Republicans have concluded that they must do more to
win black and Hispanic votes. Writing in The Wall
Street Journal on Jan. 2, former Speaker of the House
Newt Gingrich said: "The first and most important
task for Republicans must be to foster better
relations with Americans of color. This is a moral and
practical imperative."
Republicans should reach out to blacks and
immigrants, and try to convince them that political
liberty and individual freedom rest on the
Constitution's guarantee of "the equal protection
of the laws" -- the antithesis of differential
group rights.
Republicans should not compete with Democrats
who proposition black and brown voters with special
preferences based on their skin color. Preferences
destroy equality before the law and lead us back to
the status-based law of the feudal era. If we ignore
the Constitution's requirement of equality in law,
there is little to constrain us from ignoring the rest
of our governing document. It is a mistake to compete
for the black vote in a way that leads to tyranny.
If Republicans pander to minorities with
preferences, Republicans will lose the white vote that
is disadvantaged by preferences. In a convincing
article, Steve Sailer argues that Bush's
narrow win was not due to his loss of 77 percent of
the minority vote but to his winning "a measly 54
percent of the white vote."
The president-elect's father won 59 percent of
the white vote in 1988. If George W. had won 57
percent, instead of 54 percent, he would have crushed
Al Gore in the Electoral College 367 to 171.
George W. barely eked out a win, because he
lost ground with white voters. Sailer argues that
Republicans stand to gain far more votes from white
households than from racial minorities whose leaders
are wedded to racial preferences. The real threat to
the Republican Party, says Sailer, is the vast
unrestricted immigration from Third World countries
that is lessening the value of the white vote. If
nothing is done about immigration, whites will become
a minority, a minority without preferences.
Dr. Roberts' latest book, "The Tyranny of
Good Intentions," has just been released by Prima
Publishers. To find out more about Paul Craig Roberts,
and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers
and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page
at www.creators.com.
January 10, 2001