Issues & Insights
Globalism, End Of Socialism Causes Of Jobless Recovery
FOR
INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY
Friday, August 30, 2002
By Paul Craig Roberts
The Bush administration would
benefit from giving a little
more thought to the economy and a little less to Iraq.
Concerns already existed over the
economy having 116,000 fewer jobs as of July than eight
months ago, when the recovery supposedly began. Now
there might be indications that the economy softened in
mid-July and has been contracting for the past four
weeks.
Continuing job losses well into a
recovery marked the 1991 recovery. This phenomenon
suggests that profits are recovering less quickly.
Globalism and the demise of socialism are part of the
explanation.
For decades U.S. producers were protected from
competition by world socialism. But with privatizations
in the U.K. and France in the 1980s, the demise of the
Soviet empire, reforms in Latin America and China's
"capitalist road," globalism has brought increased
pressure on U.S.-generated profits. Many U.S.
multinationals owe the bulk of their profits to their
foreign operations.
Capital Mobility
An economy's success is dependent on its ability to
produce per capita income growth. Per capita income
growth in the U.S. is under attack from two factors: The
U.S. exports high-productivity jobs and imports
low-productivity people.
The advent of globalism means that
capital and technology are mobile. Mobile capital and
management seek low-cost skilled labor, and have found
it in China. A long list of American high-tech companies
have relocated manufacturing, engineering, research and
development jobs to China.
The export of high-productivity
jobs means that foreign nationals abroad earn the
incomes from producing goods sold by U.S. companies in
U.S. markets. Policy-makers and trade enthusiasts assume
that this is a rosy development, because it means lower
prices for consumers and holds down inflation. They
ignore the other side of the equation: lower growth in
per capita incomes from the loss of high-productivity
jobs.
Simultaneously, the U.S. imports
millions of poor non-English-speaking immigrants each
year. These immigrants hold down
per capita income growth in the retail,
construction and low-tech sectors of the economy.
Consumer Demand Lives
By encouraging the export of high-paying jobs and the
import of poor people, policy-makers have eroded
long-term growth in U.S. per capita incomes. The
consumer sector accounts for two-thirds of the economy
and is deeply in debt. How can there be a strong
recovery?
Low interest rates have kept
consumer demand alive through mortgage refinancing,
which frees money for household spending. When this
one-time boost plays out, what will drive consumer
demand?
More consumer debt requires a rise
in stock prices and household wealth. Business
investment requires profits and consumer demand. With
U.S. multinationals improving their bottom lines by
chasing lowest-factor cost abroad, the incomes needed to
drive the U.S. economy are not being generated in
America.
The export of jobs is rationalized
as "free trade." But no trade is involved in the export
of U.S. jobs. Chinese firms sell the U.S. goods made
with Chinese labor, and U.S. firms sell U.S. goods made
with Chinese labor. The U.S. capital and technology that
employ Chinese labor are relocated to China by U.S.
firms, not exported to China.
Trade enthusiasts stress that every $1 billion in
U.S. manufactured exports means 10,000 U.S. jobs. Last
year the U.S. exported $640 billion in manufactured
goods - thus the claim that the U.S. is dependent on
trade for 6.4 million jobs.
Trade enthusiasts neglect the other
side of their rule of thumb. Last year the U.S. imported
$951 billion in manufactured goods - a loss of 9.5
million jobs. The net effect of trade in manufactured
goods is a loss of 3.1 million U.S. jobs.
In 2002, the U.S. trade deficit in
manufactured goods is running at a $350 billion annual
rate, which translates into an increase in manufacturing
job loss of 400,000.
The income growth needed to drive
the U.S. economy cannot come from exporting
manufacturing jobs and replacing the jobs with retail
clerk jobs selling foreign-made goods.
Stock Market, Economy Split
The future could see a split of the
stock market from the economy. U.S. multinationals can
generate income on foreign operations, but the
associated wage and salary incomes accrue to foreign
nationals and do not flow through to Americans.
The U.S. has played its economic
cards carelessly. The incomes to support the U.S. share
of world consumption are no longer being generated in
the U.S. Sooner or later this fact will reduce foreign
capital flow to the U.S. and the value of the dollar.
The redistribution of income that the Third World has
been demanding from the First World is taking place as
China gains American incomes.
• Paul Craig Roberts was
assistant secretary of the Treasury for President
Reagan.
August 30, 2002