February 24, 2008
Will American Empire End Before It Ends the World?
By Paul Craig Roberts
The hypocrisy of US government officials is
boundless. On February 18, the US government inflamed
Serbians by recognizing Muslim separatists in Kosovo, a
historic province of Serbia, as an
independent country. Two hundred thousand Serbs
marched in protest and the US embassy in Belgrade was
damaged. Is this surprising? No, not unless you are an
official in the American Empire. The notorious Empire
Neocon Counsel, Azlmay Khalilzad, Bush’s representative
to the UN, declared:
"I’m outraged by the mob attack."
What’s an embassy building compared to a province of
Serbia, a province that stirs nationalist sentiments
associated with the
Serbs' long military struggles with the Turks? Had
it not been for the Serbs,
Europeans would probably be Turks.
To neocon Khalilzad a province of Serbia is nothing.
It is merely real estate to be given away by US
recognition bestowed on a break-away movement led by
what some consider to be a gang of Muslim drug runners.
Secretary of State Condi Rice also found the Serbian
response to the US giving away part of their country to
be "intolerable."
Former Assistant Secretary of State Richard Holbrooke
also sees no reason for the Serbs to be upset that
America gave away part of their country. He explained
away the Serbian protests by
declaring: "The Russians are behind this."
We can understand why US diplomacy is a failure when
we see our diplomats explaining that, had it not been
for the Russians stirring them up, Serbians wouldn’t
have noticed the loss of a historic part of their
country.
Perhaps Kosovo should have its independence. However,
the US government could not have handled the issue in a
more provocative way.
Washington has been interfering in Serbian internal
affairs since the Clinton administration. Told that
Americans had to prevent genocide, few paid enough
attention to Washington’s facilitation of the breakup of
the Yugoslav state during the 1990s and to the Clinton
administration’s bombing and murder of Serbian civilians
in order to support Muslim separatists in Kosovo in
1999. Clinton used NATO as cover, but the bombing
campaign was not backed by the UN Security Council.
Bombs fell on Serbia for 78 days, taking out public
infrastructure, bridges, factories, power stations,
petrochemical plants, telecommunications facilities,
markets, refugees, the Chinese Embassy and a passenger
train. "Sorry honey, tell the kids I won’t be home
tonight. President Clinton decided to bomb my train."
Cluster bombs and depleted uranium were used. Clearly,
the US government and its NATO puppets were guilty of
war crimes under the Nuremberg standard.
Americans were told by an obedient media that the
bombings were necessary in order to prevent Yugoslav
leader, Slobodan Milosevic, from committing war crimes
against the separatists who were stealing part of his
country. After Clinton’s bombings intimidated the
Serbian political establishment, Milosevic was turned
out of office and handed over to the Americans for a
payment of several hundred million dollars and delivered
to the Hague for trial as a war criminal.
Milosevic represented himself at his trial and was
more than a match for the trumped up charges.
Unfortunately, he died in prison. Many believe he was
helped on his way by an embarrassed American Empire
unable to convict him.
What is the US government’s secret agenda in the
Balkans? Why is the US government on the side of Muslims
intent on severing Kosovo from Serbia? What is being
served by creating a new Muslim state closer to Europe?
Whose interests are being served by Washington?
Clearly, not our own. Or Europe’s.
And, please, none of that BS about "building
freedom and democracy." As one of England’s most
famous conservatives, Peregrine Worsthorne, wrote on
February 20, America’s reputation as
"the West’s conscience is fatally weakened."
Supposedly our time is the era of globalism and one
worldism. Ancient European nationalities are dissolving
into the European Union, a new super state. US
corporations now have transnational interests devoid of
any national loyalties. Yet, the US is hard at work
dissolving a small Balkan state into even smaller
constituent parts. Why is this happening? Why did Bush
order US puppets in Britain, France and Germany to
instantly recognize the historic Serbian province as a
new Muslim state?
Is the new state of Kosovo, as rumors would have it,
Richard Perle’s payoff to the Turks, or is the
explanation that Serbia, like Palestine, Iraq, and Iran,
lacking any international media reach, was easy for
Empire Neocons to demonize in order to
establish the precedent that Washington decides what
territory belongs to who and who rules it.
Clinton’s bombing of Serbia was a precedent for
Bush’s bombing of Afghanistan and Iraq and now Africa
and tomorrow Iran and Syria.
The day the Empire Crazies bomb Russia or China, we
are all fried.
Be a macho super patriot, believe your government,
help to fry the world. It’s the American way.
Paul Craig Roberts [email
him] was Assistant
Secretary of the Treasury during President Reagan’s
first term. He was Associate Editor of the Wall
Street Journal. He has held numerous academic
appointments, including the William E. Simon Chair,
Center for Strategic and International Studies,
Georgetown University, and Senior Research Fellow,
Hoover Institution, Stanford University. He was awarded
the Legion of Honor by French President Francois
Mitterrand. He is the author of
Supply-Side Revolution : An Insider's Account of
Policymaking in Washington;
Alienation
and the Soviet Economy and
Meltdown: Inside the Soviet Economy,
and is the co-author
with Lawrence M. Stratton of
The Tyranny of Good Intentions : How Prosecutors and
Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name
of Justice. Click
here for Peter
Brimelow’s Forbes Magazine interview with Roberts
about the recent epidemic of prosecutorial misconduct.