November 01, 2007
Hegemony’s Cost
By Paul Craig Roberts
"See, in my line of work you got to keep repeating
things over and over and over again for the truth to
sink in, to kind of catapult the propaganda."
(Bush,
at the Athena Performing Arts Center
at Greece Athena Middle and High School,
Tuesday, May 24, 2005 in Rochester, NY)
MP3 )
When he departs the White House on 20 January, 2009, the current resident
will bequeath to the American people and the next
administration an interminable war in the Middle East
and a depreciated currency.
And that’s the good news. It assumes there is a successor administration
and that no Cheney-contrived "national emergency"
will make it possible for Bush to test drive
National Security Presidential Directive/NSPD-51 and
Homeland Security Presidential Directive/HSPD-20 to
cancel the 2008 election.
Neoconservatives led by vice president Dick Cheney remain determined to
effect "regime change" in Iran. The allegation of
weapons of mass destruction falsely brought against Iraq
is now being deployed against Iran.
The International Atomic Energy Agency says that there is no evidence
that Iran has a nuclear weapons program. The IAEA is the
institution that polices the Nuclear Non-proliferation
Treaty by inspecting the nuclear facilities of the
signatories to the treaty of which Iran is one. However,
the neocon/Cheney/Bush regime is prepared to bomb Iran
on the basis of fibs alone.
Faithfully repeated by the propaganda ministry that masquerades as the
"mainstream media," those fibs have been trotted out
so many times in recent months that significant numbers
of Americans now believe themselves to be in peril from
nonexistent Iranian nukes.
In this way the regime gains the complicity of the American people and
their representatives in Congress for what will be
unprovoked aggression against a third Middle Eastern
country, a third war crime under the Nuremberg standard.
The "war on terror" is a hoax. It serves as a cover for the drive
for US and Israeli hegemony in the Middle East. Iraq,
Iran, and Syria became neoconservative targets, because
they were the only Middle Eastern countries that are not
American puppet states or dependencies.
Afghanistan was attacked, because the Taliban were uniting the country
under the banner of Islam, a development that, if
successful, could lead to the overthrow of the
governments in America’s puppet states and dependencies.
The war rhetoric against Iran ratcheted up when the White House belatedly
realized that the result of "bringing democracy to
Iraq" was to empower the majority Shi’ites, thereby
creating a Shi’ite crescent from Iran to southern
Lebanon and alarming America’s Sunni Saudi Arabian
dependent.
Israel’s goal is to have the Americans eliminate the Muslim states that
support Hamas and Hezbollah’s opposition to Israel’s
theft of the remainder of Palestine and southern
Lebanon, whose water resources Israel covets. Israel’s
goal thus precisely coincides with that of the Cheney
regime.
The
"Cakewalk War" in Iraq was supposed to be over
in a few weeks and to pay for itself out of Iraqi oil
revenues. The war is now five years old and has cost
American taxpayers, and those left dependent on
government programs by decades of a welfare state, $1
trillion in out-of-pocket and already incurred future
costs.
As large and troublesome as this cost is, it pales in comparison to the
damage the war has done to the value of the dollar and
its role as reserve currency. Since 2001, the Euro has
risen 60 percent against the dollar.
This means much more to Americans than the higher cost of a European
vacation and status symbol German cars. The US dollar is
losing its reserve currency role when the Euro, the
currency of a nonexistent country--Europe--becomes so
much more desirable than the dollar that it rises 60
percent in value.
The Euro is a monetary unit that has run far ahead of the political entity
whose currency it is. Europe still consists of separate
sovereign states, and many of them are unhappy with the
Euro. Yet, since 2001 people throughout the world have
been shifting from dollars to Euros.
It is not normal for people to flee from the reserve currency. It only
happens when people believe it cannot continue to fill
that role.
The US dollar is under double assault. One assault is from the offshoring
of American jobs, which turns US GDP into foreign GDP
and worsens the US trade deficit. It is not possible to
achieve a trade balance when the production of goods and
services for the US market is being moved offshore by US
corporations.
The other assault is from the US budget deficit. Americans have become so
hard pressed that their savings rate is negligible. The
US government has to rely on foreigners to lend it money
for its annual expenditures. Washington’s two biggest
bankers are China and Japan, the countries with the
largest trade surpluses with the US.
The transformation of the Iraq "cakewalk" into an interminable war
has run up a one trillion dollar price tag, and an even
larger war with Iran is looming. US generals and
neoconservative ideologues predict a decade or
multi-decade long war in the Middle East. Washington’s
bankers are waking up to the reality that they will not
be repaid.
The only reason the dollar has not already lost its reserve currency role
is that the only alternative is the currency of a
non-existent political entity. Yet, even the Euro, a
virtual currency, may have taken the dollar’s role by
the end of 2008.
Full of hegemonic hubris, the US government does not understand that US
power and hegemony have always depended, not on missiles
and military force, but on the financial power conveyed
by the dollar’s role as reserve currency.
The reserve currency is world money, good in any country to pay any bill.
The reserve currency country is not a debtor in the
usual sense. As the reserve currency can be used to
settle international accounts, the reserve currency
country can borrow at will until lenders lose confidence
in the currency.
There is abundant evidence that the loss of confidence in the dollar is
underway. When it is complete, the US will no longer be
a superpower.
The decline in American power and influence could be dramatic. Part of
America’s power results from European countries going
along with Washington. However, the sharp rise in the
Euro’s value has hurt European exports, squeezing profit
margins, wages, and encouraging offshore production.
Fights over monetary policy between European capitals
could doom both the EU and the Euro, leaving the world
with no reserve currency and America with embittered
former allies.
By going to war for hegemony, the Bush Regime has brought about American
decline. While the neocons have spent two
administrations trying to deracinate Islam, real threats
to America’s power have been neglected.
Offshoring, which turns US GDP into imports and
larger trade deficits, together with
war debts, has eroded the
dollar’s status as reserve currency, undermining the
foundation of American power.
COPYRIGHT
CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
Paul Craig Roberts
[email
him] was Assistant
Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration.
He is the author of
Supply-Side Revolution : An Insider's Account of
Policymaking in Washington;
Alienation
and the Soviet Economy and
Meltdown: Inside the Soviet Economy,
and is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of
The Tyranny of Good Intentions : How Prosecutors and
Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name
of Justice. Click
here for Peter
Brimelow’s Forbes Magazine interview with Roberts
about the recent epidemic of prosecutorial misconduct.