April 23, 2007
The War Goes Ever On
By Paul Craig Roberts
Is the Iraq war to become a permanent feature?
The war persists despite the opposition of a majority
of Americans and Iraqis.
The war persists despite warnings from US generals
that the stress is
breaking the US Army.
The war persists despite its enormous cost in red ink
and dependence on foreign loans.
The war persists despite its total failure.
The war persists despite the known fact that it was
based on Bush administration lies and deception.
President Bush's latest delusion—the surge—has not
increased security. The surge has been accompanied by
new records of daily Iraqi civilian casualties, such as
the 312 Iraqis killed and 305 wounded on April 18.
Recently, US commanding general
David Petraeus said that Iraqis would just have to
learn to live with daily bombing attacks. Petraeus
promises Iraqis decades of violence when he says,
"Iraq is going to have to learn—as did Northern
Ireland—to live with some degree of sensational attacks."[
Bombers
Kill 12 In Baghdad, Reuters, April 22, 2007]
For the past two years polls of the US public have
shown that a majority of Americans believe that it was a
mistake to invade Iraq.
Polls of Iraqis show that large majorities support
attacks on US troops and want US forces withdrawn from
their country.
The Iraqi Ministry of Health has concluded
that 70% of primary school students in Baghdad suffer
from trauma-related stress from passing dead bodies
in the streets, from witnessing relatives being killed,
and from being injured in attacks.
President Bush and his dwindling band of apologists
allege that the US cannot withdraw from Iraq without a
bloodbath between Sunnis and Shiites. This bloodbath is
already occurring. Indeed, the bloodbath was caused by
the US invasion, which took political power from Sunnis
and gave it to Shiites in the form of a US protectorate
or colony.
Bush's invasion of Iraq had no justification.
Continuing the war has no positive effects. Each day
that the war continues produces more pointless
casualties, more red ink and dependence on foreign
creditors, more trauma, and more hatreds.
The Bush administration is continuing the war without
a realizable or defensible goal. Although the Iraqi
government is supposedly a democratically elected
majority Shiite government, in reality it is puppet
creature of the US occupation without real power and
without public support. The "Iraqi government"
exists only within the heavily fortified and US guarded
"green zone" in Baghdad. Even this
protected zone is subject to attacks. Just last week
the
parliament was bombed
As a colony or protectorate, Iraq is too costly to
maintain. The US has already incurred out-of-pocket and
future costs of $1 trillion or more. The total gains
from oil exploitation and military-security complex
profits do not approach this massive figure imposed on
US taxpayers which is growing by the day.
As bad as it is, the situation could suddenly become
much worse. Those in charge of US policy want to expand
their targets from Sunni insurgents to Shiite militias.
US forces have been unable to prevail over a lightly
armed insurgency drawn from 20% of the population. The
Shiite population is three times larger. Moreover,
Shiites control southern Iraq, the territory through
which US supplies must pass from Kuwait to Baghdad. If
the Bush administration manages to get itself at war
with 80% of the Iraqi population, US troops could be cut
off and destroyed.
How would an unstable egomaniac such as President
Bush deal with the humiliation?
The US dollar, already under pressure from large and
growing trade deficits, has lost more of its value to
the Bush administration's dependence on foreign
borrowing to finance its war. With foreigners
accumulating huge annual sums in US denominated assets,
the US dollar's reserve currency role is jeopardized. If
the dollar loses its reserve currency role, foreigners
will not finance our wars or our trade and budget
deficits.
The risks of Bush's war both to Iraqis and Americans
is out of proportion to any conceivable gains. The war
is all cost and no benefit. Iraqis have been made
massively insecure, and their country has undergone
tremendous destruction and turned into a training ground
for terrorists.
The entire Middle East has been put at risk of
Sunni-Shiite conflict. Muslim hostility to US puppet
regimes in Egypt, Jordan, and Pakistan is rising. The
Saudis have warned Washington that the Iraq war is
causing the ground to shake beneath their feet.
Bush claims that he invaded Iraq because he so highly
values democracy that he desired to establish one in
Iraq as an example for other Middle Eastern countries to
follow.
However, what Bush has demonstrated to Muslims is
that American democracy is unresponsive to citizens and
voters. Bush has demonstrated to the world that the US
government is controlled by a small oligopoly of vested
interests, the public be damned. Democracy means a
government that follows the will of the people. Bush is
ignoring public opinion and has made it clear that he
will continue the practice.
Bush has shown the world that the only difference
between American dictatorship and other dictatorships is
that, for now, Americans are permitted to remove their
dictator after his term is served.
COPYRIGHT
CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
Paul Craig Roberts
[email
him] was Assistant
Secretary of the Treasury in the Reagan Administration.
He is the author of
Supply-Side Revolution : An Insider's Account of
Policymaking in Washington;
Alienation
and the Soviet Economy and
Meltdown: Inside the Soviet Economy,
and is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton of
The Tyranny of Good Intentions : How Prosecutors and
Bureaucrats Are Trampling the Constitution in the Name
of Justice. Click
here for Peter
Brimelow’s Forbes Magazine interview with Roberts
about the recent epidemic of prosecutorial misconduct.