“We are now deeply concerned about reports of military movements taken by the Russian federation inside of Ukraine,” Mr. Obama said from the White House.
“The U.S. will stand with the international community in affirming that there will be costs for any military intervention in Ukraine,” he added, without detailing what actions the U.S. and international community would take.
The president`s statement came amid a day of heightened tension in Ukraine, after heavily armed gunmen surrounded two airports in the restive pro-Russian region of Crimea, which prompted outcries from authorities in the region that Russia was behind the invasion.
Meanwhile, as the Russkies fly troops into Crimea, the Russian diplomats continue to point out that the president of the Ukraine was overthrown in a violent coup by street fighters and demand that the peaceful deal worked out with the opposition and with American proxies like Slate columnist Anne Applebaum`s husband Radoslaw Sikorski, the Polish foreign minister, be reinstated. The Guardian quotes Russian UN ambassador Vitaly Churkin:
Ukraine had a democratically elected president with a democratically elected majority in parliament. Yatsenyuk could’ve taken the post [of prime minister, offered during negotiations], and could’ve signed the agreement with the European Union if he wanted, but then they went for toppling the president and a regime-change operation.
Interference from our western colleagues has not been helpful, and they have certain responsibilities to those dramatic consequences and also responsibilities for not following through on those agreements they affixed their signatures on February 21.
The best way to resolve the crisis is to look hard at the February 21 agreement. They need to [reform] a constitution. they need to refrain from a hasty presidential election which is likely to cause more friction. They need to show that this is about national unity.
The Guardian adds: “Churkin did not acknowledge that protesters in Kiev never accepted the agreement and that Yanukovych had fled the capital by last Friday night.”
If that`s not Democracy! I don`t know what is.
I presume that Obama and Kerry would have been very happy with Sikorski`s deal, but the street bravos weren`t. Yet, the Obama Administration and its allies like George Soros (but which is the tail and which is the dog?) have some degree of responsibility for setting in motion the putsch.
Did Obama and Kerry realize they were playing with fire?
Personally, I didn`t see myself as suffering all that much from the fact that until a week ago Ukraine had an elected president whose policy was to try to play off Russia and the West in economic negotiations to try to get the best deals for his government (not necessarily for his citizens, of course — but I`m struck by how much of the anger in the American press at the former Ukrainian president is over his impudence at trying to extract more money from Putin than whatever the West was willing to offer).
But now we`ve got a new Cold War, and I suspect I`ll be paying for it for a long, long time.
For example, I`ve seen only the most coded interest in the mainstream press in investigating the question: Did we go too far in the Ukraine? By unleashing — whether unintentionally or intentionally — a bunch of Banderaite hard men to overthrow the elected president, that`s naturally upsetting to Russians (and to Poles, too). But, will there be any accountability within the U.S. for overplaying a strong hand?