“The New Dating Game”
The Weekly Standard`s cover story The New Dating Game by Charlotte Allen has much of interest:
… the percentage of married people ages 35 to 44 has declined precipitously over the last 40 years: from 88 percent of men and 87 percent of women in 1960 to 66 percent of men and 67 percent of women in 2005. Since first marriages after age 45â€”when a womanâ€™s fertile years are finishedâ€”are statistically rare, almost everyone who is ever going to marry is already married by that age. The percentage of children growing up in fatherless familiesâ€”a chief risk factor for social pathologiesâ€”has risen concomitantly: from 9 percent of all households with children in 1960 to 26 percent today. On the plus side of the ledger, these negative trends donâ€™t affect the college-educated as severely. College-educated women have significantly higher rates of marriage and lower rates of divorce than women without college degrees. The bad news is that such women, who tend to marry late, have far fewer children. In 2004, according to the Census Bureauâ€™s Current Population Survey, 24 percent of women ages 40 to 44 with bachelorâ€™s degrees were childless, in contrast to 10 percent of women without a high school diploma. Marriage is slowly becoming a preserve of the elite, who pay a price in severely reduced fertility. …
Some argue, though, that it is actually beta men who are the greatest victims of the current mating chaos: the ones who work hard, act nice, and find themselves searching in vain for potential wives and girlfriends among the hordes of young women besotted by alphas. That is the underlying message of what is undoubtedly the most deftly written and also the darkest of the seduction-community websites, the blog Roissy in DC. Unlike his confreres, Roissy does not sell books or boot camps, and his site carries no ads. He also blogs anonymously, or at least tries to. (Purported photos of Roissy circulating on the Internet show a tall unshaven man in his late 30s with piercing blue eyes and good, if somewhat dissolute, looks.) …
If Roissy has anything resembling a mentor, it is F. Roger Devlin. Trained as a political philosopherâ€”he has a doctorate from Tulaneâ€”Devlin holds no academic post, and his oeuvre, besides a published version of his doctoral thesis on Alexandre Koj?¨ve, consists of a series of essays and reviews concerning relations between the sexes for the Occidental Quarterly, a paleoconservative publication whose other contributors tend to focus obsessively on the question of which ethnic groups belong to which race.
â€?The sexual revolution in America was an attempt by women to realize their own [hypergamous] utopia, not that of men,â€? Devlin wrote. Beta men become superfluous until the newly liberated women start double-clutching after years in the serial harems of alphas who wonâ€™t â€?commit,â€? lower their standards, and â€?settle.â€? During this process, monogamy as a stable and civilization-maintaining social institution is shattered. â€?Monogamy is a form of sexual optimization,â€? Devlin told me. â€?It allows as many people who want to get married to do so. Under monogamy, 90 percent of men find a mate at least once in their life.â€? This isnâ€™t necessarily so anymore in todayâ€™s chaotic combination of polygamy for lucky alphas, hypergamy in varying degrees for females depending on their sex appeal, and, at least in theory, large numbers of betas left without mates at allâ€”just as it is in baboon packs. The aim of Mystery-style game is to give those betas better odds.”
By the way, Devlin recently reviewed at VDARE.com Tatu Vanhanen`s The Limits of Democratization: Climate, Intelligence, and Resource Distribution.