WAR
AGAINST CHRISTMAS 2001 COMPETITION
[
I
] [II]
[III]
[IV]
[V]
[VI]
Also see: War Against
Christmas 2000
Announcing VDARE.COM’S Annual War Against
Christmas Competition!
Peter
Brimelow
writes: Thanksgiving is over (we’ve pointed out
its forgotten National Question
dimension)
but did Santa Claus bring up the end of your
parade this year? That’s a tradition that’s
going to go, if the Abolish America Army has
anything to do with it. (Separation of saint
and state, you know. Any sightings of Father
Frost yet?)
(Claus Canned
in MD!)
Hard to believe that our ever-popular competition to
find the most egregious attempt to abolish Christmas
used to appear in
National Review
(click
here
for story and last year’s competition) before Buckley
abandoned
immigration reform and started publishing
attacks
on the villains who talked him into advocating it.
But Tom Fleming’s
Chronicles
Magazine still knows the cultural
score, notwithstanding his recent
dark observations
about the
political score. (We’ll be posting his reply to us next
week.) This powerful article by Tom Piatak, just
published in Chronicles’
December issue and reproduced here with permission, is
one of the best accounts of the War Against Christmas
that we’ve seen.
Send your reports of this year’s skirmishes and
sorties to
witan@vdare.com, marked “WAR AGAINST CHRISTMAS
COMPETITION,” clearly stating if you want your email
and/or name witheld. Prize: A signed copy of
Alien Nation (or,
if you’ve already learned it by heart, a bottle of
champagne).
Happy Holidays? Bah! Humbug!
by
Tom Piatak
In 1938, Whittaker Chambers broke
with the Communist Party. In
Witness, Chambers describes his Christmas that
year as one of great joy, in which he first told his
children the Christmas story, shared with them the
Christmas ornaments that had decorated his childhood
Christmas trees, and enjoyed the Christmas carols his
daughter was then learning.
At first glance, it is surprising
that Christmas 1938 should have meant anything to the
Chambers family. After all, Chambers was not yet a
Christian, and his wife had never been a Christian. Yet
such was the splendor of Christmas as once celebrated in
America that Chambers had felt its pull even when he was
still a Communist. Chambers remembered that “Christmas
had always been our one great holiday when I was a boy,”
and, as a Party member, he introduced his family to as
much of the Christmas celebration as the Party
permitted.
A contemporary of Chambers, Fr.
Gereon Goldmann, experienced a very different
Christmas half a world away. As a conscript in the SS,
Goldmann was forced to celebrate not Christmas, but a
bizarre winter holiday concocted by the Nazis:
"On
Christmas Eve, there was a celebration, not a Christian
one, but a pagan German Julfest. We were all
together and had to sing some trash about the night of
the clear stars and other sad substitutes for the true
Christmas message."
As shocking as it may sound, the
contemporary public observance of Christmas in
America bears a much closer resemblance to the Nazis’
Julfest than to the Christmas that enticed Chambers.
And this extraordinary transformation has occurred in a
generation.
I was born in 1964. Of course, my
memories of my family Christmases are warm ones. But I
also fondly remember the public celebrations of
Christmas. In my public elementary school, we made
Christmas ornaments and Christmas cards, sang Christmas
carols, and ate Christmas cookies. In junior high, our
Christmas concert introduced me to more wonderful
Christmas music, including a portion of Bach’s
Christmas Oratorio and Pietro Yon’s
“Gesu Bambino.” “Merry Christmas” was a universal
greeting, Christmas carolers were regular visitors in
our neighborhood, and the profusion of decorations
adorning all manner of stores left no doubt as to what
holiday everyone was celebrating. Local radio stations
would air Christmas music throughout December, and the
most popular station in town would air nothing but
Christmas music from 6:00 P.M. on Christmas Eve until
the end of Christmas Day. Television was filled with
Christmas specials, and even the most secular shows
almost invariably featured workmanlike and even reverent
performances of some hallowed carols.
No one I knew was bothered by the
effusive celebration of a national holiday observed by
the overwhelming majority of Americans. The only
concerns of which I was aware were admonitions against
the commercialization of Christmas and to
“keep Christ in Christmas.”
Such concerns now seem quaint. As
Don Feder
observed last December, “Today, the challenge is to
keep Christmas in Christmas.” We now have “holiday
cards,” “holiday parties,” “holiday songs,” and even
“holiday trees.” In order to avoid giving offense to
anyone anywhere, millions of Americas are now seemingly
content to
keep quiet about the holiday they do celebrate and
to act as if all sorts of other minor festivals—Kwanzaa,
Hanukkah, Bodhi Day, Diwali, Ramadan, the winter
solstice—are equally important. It has reached the point
where wishing someone a “Merry Christmas” is a political
act, not a friendly commonplace. Think about it: When
was the last time a store employee, seeing you buying
presents on Christmas Eve, wished you a “Merry
Christmas” rather than “Happy Holidays”? When was the
last time you wished a stranger “Merry Christmas” rather
than “Happy Holidays”?
My first introduction to the
anti-Christmas mania
that has engulfed America occurred in college. In 1984,
a suitemate and I attempted to introduce Christmas cheer
to our dormitory by putting up a Christmas tree and a
nativity scene. Unfortunately, our suite also housed
prospective students visiting the campus, and we were
told the crèche had to go, lest a prospective
non-Christian student take offense. Apparently,
high-school seniors were so delicate that they could not
withstand the knowledge that other people might not
believe everything they did.
Law school was no better. In 1988,
the new dean of the Michigan Law School,
Lee Bollinger, issued an edict to the law-school
student singing group, the Headnotes, declaring that
they could not sing any Christmas music at the school’s
end-of-semester gathering. This prohibition covered not
just religious carols, but any song that even mentioned
the word “Christmas.” (Ironically, Bollinger’s academic
specialty is the First Amendment.) Instead, the law
school offered up an absurd, leftist commentary on
“Antigone” set to
awful contemporary music. (As a friend remarked, it
was beginning to look a lot like Thebes.)
Of course, the desire to suppress
Christmas is scarcely confined to higher education. My
sisters’ children until very recently attended a public
elementary school in an affluent Detroit suburb. In that
suburban system, which has a student body that is
overwhelmingly white and (at least nominally) Christian,
teachers are forbidden to mention Christmas. Instead,
they teach about Hanukkah and Kwanzaa. So thorough was
the indoctrination that my nephew asked two years ago
why we did not celebrate Hanukkah or Kwanzaa. He knew
about Christmas, of course, but was understandably
concerned that he was missing out on something, since
the only holidays he heard about outside the home were
absent from our family celebrations.
Some elementary-school teachers
have chosen a less direct assault on Christmas,
diminishing its importance by presenting it as merely
one of an ever-growing list of seemingly equal and
interchangeable holidays rather than obliterating all
mention of it. Last year, a friend’s son participated in
his elementary school’s “holiday concert.” In his school
system, the great majority of students are white and
Christian, yet only two Christmas carols were sung, and
one of them was “Feliz Navidad.” This small
concession to Christmas was more than outweighed by the
two Kwanzaa songs, the two Hanukkah songs, the Ramadan
song, and the Chinese New Year song the children also
performed. (I suspect that all the non-Christmas songs
are recent concoctions, written for such dreary
occasions as contemporary public school “winter
concerts.”)
Another illustration of the
multicultural madness came from a friend whose daughter
attends public school in another suburb that is
overwhelmingly white and Christian. She brought home an
exercise designed to help the children learn to tell
time. The
exercise featured the following “holiday schedule”
for a “winter holiday party”:
Make Kwanzaa mkekas: 12:00 noon
Make Christmas cookies: 12:30 p.m.
Listen to a story about Ramadan:
1:00 p.m.
Play the dreidel game: 1:30 p.m.
Break a piñata: 2:00 p.m.
Make Diwali powder designs: 2:30
p.m.
Go on a Chinese New Year parade:
3:00 p.m.
The sheer inanity of these examples
(and of the countless others that could have been
included) is striking. But the most important thing
about the transformation of Christmas to “holiday” is
how needless it was, and how it was the product not of
“tolerance,” but of hatred, resentment, and envy.
The transformation was needless
because the formerly exuberant American Christmas
inflicted real harm on no one, while giving joy to many.
Christmas in America was never marked by pogroms or
expressions of hatred but by countless acts of charity
and kindness. Much of the public celebration of
Christmas was capable of being enjoyed by non-Christians
as well as Christians, and almost everyone did enjoy at
least some of it. I know non-Christians who enjoy
Christmas specials, Christmas movies, Christmas music; I
do not think these people are unique.
The multiculturalists justify their
assault on Christmas by claiming that the public
celebration of Christmas causes non-Christians to feel
“left out.” I am skeptical of this claim; I suspect most
people are not overwhelmed by the knowledge that others
do not always believe as they do. But even if the
multiculturalists are right, how much should we worry
about those who feel left out by the public celebration
of Christmas? We cannot forever shield non-Christians
from the reality that they are a minority in America,
and suppressing the observances of the majority seems a
high price to pay to allow overly sensitive souls to
live in a comfortable delusion. Of course, children
should not be required to participate in school
activities of which their parents disapprove, and local
control of schools means that districts with large
populations of non-Christians will probably have
different December activities than districts that
reflect the American norm. But a child who does not
participate in a Christmas concert is no more excluded
than a child whose parents do not allow him to go on a
field trip or take a role in a school play. We do not
respond to one form of exclusion by banning field trips
or plays; we should not respond to the other by banning
Christmas.
The multiculturalists, though,
respond to the phony problem of exclusion by trying to
ban Christmas because banning Christmas is what they are
all about. They are animated by a hatred of
Christianity, or of the West, or by sheer envy and
resentment of the glories of a holiday they despise. If
Christian children benefit from learning about Hanukkah
and Kwanzaa and all the rest, shouldn’t non-Christian
children benefit even more from learning about the
holiday most of their countrymen observe? But, of
course, the trend has been to load curricula with
references to formerly obscure festivals, while
assiduously minimizing and even eliminating references
to Christmas.
The malice of the multiculturalists
is revealed in the way they present the alternative
holidays they so evidently prefer. Kwanzaa, Hanukkah,
and all the rest are presented as faux-Christmases, even
anti-Christmases, in order to compete with, diminish,
and ultimately efface Christmas. If Hanukkah customarily
fell in October, would anyone other than observant Jews
even notice it?
Indeed, the versions of Kwanzaa and
Hanukkah now being taught to millions of schoolchildren
are fabrications. Kwanzaa, of course, is completely
phony, the 1966
invention of black nationalist Maulana Karenga. But
Hanukkah’s contemporary incarnation is a fabrication,
too—the “Jewish Kwanzaa,” as Frederic Schwarz observed
in last December’s American Heritage magazine.
Traditionally, Hanukkah was a very minor festival,
primarily for children, overshadowed theologically not
only by the High Holy Days and Passover but also by
Simchat Torah, Shavuot, and Sukkot, and surpassed by
Purim as an occasion for celebration. Teaching children
about Kwanzaa, rather than about the Christmas carols
and spirituals developed by blacks, inculcates negative
lessons about whites instead of positive ones about
blacks. Teaching children about Hanukkah, rather than
the beliefs that actually sustained Jews on their
sometimes tragic and tumultuous historical journey,
inculcates negative lessons about Christianity, not
positive ones about Judaism.
Nor, despite the multiculturalists’
claims, are the anti-Christmases even remotely equal to
the real thing. In theological terms, Christmas is the
second most important feast in the Christian calendar.
In practical terms, it has been the principal holiday of
the world’s most creative civilization for over a
millennium. It has inspired a profusion of art,
architecture, literature, and music; a love of Christmas
can lead to a deeper love of our whole civilization.
Giotto never painted a Kwanzaa scene, Bach did not
write a Hanukkah Oratorio, and
Dickens did not pen A Ramadan Carol. And no one
comparable to them did, either. Ultimately, we should be
free to celebrate Christmas publicly and joyously,
because it is a great holiday, and because it is our
holiday—one of the crowning glories of the Western
culture that gave birth to America and sustains us
still.
Despite the undeniably depressing
nature of the continuing and expanding assault against
Christmas, I have not lost all hope. Most Americans
still cherish Christmas, just as Chambers remembered
Christmas with fondness even during his time as a
Communist. The truth set Chambers free from Communism,
and the truth can set us free from multiculturalism. If
we summon the courage to stand up for our beliefs, the
words of the
carol beloved by Dickens will once more ring true:
Now to the
Lord sing praises,
All you
within this place,
And with
true love and brotherhood,
Each other
now embrace.
This holy
tide of Christmas,
All others
doth deface.
O tidings
of comfort and joy,
Comfort
and joy.
O tidings
of comfort and joy.
Tom Piatak writes from
Cleveland, Ohio.
November 23, 2001