Republished by VDARE.com on September 25, 2003
Same space, a brisker pace
The Times
(London)
June 24, 1989
By Peter Brimelow
PARIS—Roaring through evening
sunlight and showers along the E5 autoroute
north-eastward towards Paris, the words of the
Chorus in Henry V, came suddenly to mind:
'Can this cockpit hold the vasty fields of France?'
And I found myself wondering, not for the first time,
how Shakespeare knew.
Sheer space and its absence is one
of the differences that most forcefully strikes the
traveller between America and Western Europe. Yet the
fields of France are indeed vast, particularly in that
region. And with more than four times the area of
England, France can offer a hint of the rural emptiness
you find motoring through even the most populated states
of America's eastern seaboard.
France puts the Englishman resident
in America at the intersection of three cultures. For
example, you regularly come across reminders of
England's medieval empire in France, the precursor by
several centuries of the later transatlantic empire amid
whose similar echoes I now live. Charming old towns turn
out to have been besieged, or even owned, by familiar
figures from English history many of whom, in the long
aftermath of the Norman Conquest, were actually, of
course, native French-speakers.
In some corner of their hearts,
English expatriates always cherish a romanticized
version of their native land's countryside. But I am
pained to admit that France seems closer to this ideal.
There seems to be an endless supply of quaint villages
and fairy-tale castles, uncontaminated by modern sprawl
whether because of France's greater size, or avoidance
of the Victorian industrial revolution, or the natives'
thrifty willingness to live in land-economical
apartments.
By contrast, Britain and America
share a propensity for jarring junk development. But the
American wilderness can swallow it. In Britain, a
landscape evolved over a thousand years is being
destroyed. Two years ago, I complained on this page
about the paving-over of the Wirral peninsula since I
lived there as an adolescent. I received a flood of
protesting letters. But I can only conclude sadly that
the process is so insidious that my correspondents have
allowed themselves to be deceived.
When you consider France from an
American perspective, things look different. On a
popular level, the Americans have fully inherited the
mutual incomprehension traditional between the English
and the French. But France fascinates them too. American
English is everywhere in Paris, and American guidebooks
are replete with American angles the Luxembourg Gardens
become the place where a destitute Ernest Hemingway
strangled pigeons for lunch.
There is a case, well made in Alain
Peyrefitte's The Trouble with France, that the
two societies represent polar opposites: France with the
centralized state and dirigiste traditions that can be
traced back to Roman Gaul; America, the extreme case of
the Anglo-Saxon preference for decentralization, limited
government, individualism.
But if that's so, I found myself
thinking as we neared Paris, why were French cars
constantly whisking past me although I was doing 85mph?
In America, the Washington
bureaucracy, originally using the energy crisis as an
excuse and arguably breaching the principle of
federalism, has more or less succeeded, by threatening
to withhold highway funds, in imposing a 55mph limit
upon all the individual states. This policy, a misguided
substitute for higher petrol prices, was obviously
anomalous given America's longer distances, particularly
in the sparsely inhabited western states, and its great
expressways, edged with acres of soothing gravel where
the French autoroutes have vicious-looking solid
barriers.
A promise to relax the restriction
was part of the Republican platform when Ronald Reagan
was elected president in 1980. But, as so often with the
Reagan programme, the permanent government seems to have
prevailed. A long journey by car in America can still
feel like joining a sedate procession of waddling ducks.
On a French autoroute, you feel pursued by hawks. And
you can get there sooner.
The point is not just that the
French have speed limits but ignore them. The French
speed limits are higher anyway. American government may
be generally less intrusive, but its interventions are
often massive, clumsy and imbued with a crusading moral
fanaticism.
You could illustrate the issue
equally with reference to toilet facilities in French
restaurants, startlingly meagre to North American eyes
although presumably acceptable to French health
inspectors. But I will refrain.
Every man, Voltaire said in the
18th century, has two countries: his own and France. In
the 20th century America has come to play this role.
Anyone who doubts it should contemplate the MacDonald
hamburger stands in Paris, filled with feeding French.
But in the glory of early summer it would be a hard
heart that is not melted by this magic land.
The author is a senior editor of
Forbes Magazine in New York.
[Originally
published in England, spelling and grammar vary slightly
from American style.]