Alien Nation Review: Migration
World Magazine, May-June 1995
Migration World Magazine,
May-June 1995 v23 n3 p49(1)
Alien
Nation: Common Sense About America's Immigration
Disaster.
© Center for Migration Studies
of New York Inc. 1995
Immigration will undoubtedly be a
key issue in the presidential elections next year,
just as the issue was pivotal in the last
gubernatorial elections in California. As if on cue,
Peter Brimelow, a senior editor of Forbes
magazine and the National
Review, has written a new book that is sure to
become the Bible for hardliners on immigration.
While Brimelow is politically
conservative, not all his fellow conservatives share
his intense antagonism toward U.S. immigration policy
In Alien Nation,
Brimelow treats pro-immigration conservatives
tolerantly, giving them the equivalent of a tap on the
wrist for their misstep. His venom is reserved for the
liberal "immigration enthusiasts," blaming
them for what he predicts will be the fall of the
Republic.
The book's incendiary tone and
the author's highly personal and contentious tone may
well turn off many reasonable readers. However,
despite all the fire and brimstone and the apocalyptic
predictions, Brimelow makes some valid points and even
offers some sensible solutions.
Brimelow expresses his outrage by
casting himself as a modern day Thomas Paine, the
Revolutionary War era author of Common Sense An
Englishman by birth, now a U.S. citizen, Brimelow
warns that the very survival of America rests on
stopping the flow of immigrants. He points out that
the ride of immigrants is at an historic high - some 2
million legal and illegal immigrants enter the country
each year. In a bit of a stretch of reason, Brimelow
blames much of what is wrong with America today on
immigrants. Immigrants, argues Brimelow, are
responsible for: crime, crowded schools, jails and
hospitals, and swelling welfare mils. So dire is the
situation that the likely result, says Brimelow, that
"the snuffing out of the American nation, like a
candle in a gale."
The villain, says Brimelow, was
the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, which
reversed the severe restrictions imposed by the Quota
Act of 1921 and the Immigration Act of 1924. The 1965
law eliminated the principle of preference for
northern and western Europeans, allowing all countries
to contribute to a maximum number of immigrants;
another provision gave the highest priority within
each country to family reunification. This, Brimelow
says, established a "chain letter effect,
ultimately ramifying far beyond the original
immigrant." Brimelow argues that the 1965 act was
a terrible turn in the nation's history, with
monumental and deleterious effects on the nation's
economy and society.
Brimelow offers "some quick
suggestions" for getting America back on track
Among Brimelow's suggestions:
* Defend the border by increasing
the size of the Border Patrol from 4,000 to 8,000. He
advises sealing the 100 miles along the Mexican border
where 90% of apprehensions are made, with a fence or a
ditch.
* Increase the INS Investigations
Division.
* Institute an Operation Wetback
similar to a 1954 program that sent more than 1
million illegal Mexicans back to their homeland.
* Eliminate all amnesty programs
- regardless of circumstances.
* Establish national identity
card.
* Favor skilled immigration over
family reunification.
* Drastic cutback of legal
immigration, including reunification and other special
categories.
* Eliminate payments to illegal
immigrants, including that implicit in public
education.
Few would argue that the
immigration laws need fixing. Even House majority
leader, Dick Armey has called for "a more
orderly" policy and some of Brimelow's proposed
quick fixes are indeed already being considered in
Congress. However, a number of Brimelow's suggestions
would turn back to pages in history that are better
left untouched.
Foremost among these is
establishing another Operation Wetback, which he
suggests should be conducted as a coordinated effort
by all levels of government, including the IlLS and
HUD. Yet, the original Operation Wetback was so
reviled that repeating it (particularly in light of
the fact that Los Angeles, for example, is 40%
Hispanic) could well result in mass dots. The economic
and social repercussions of another Operation Wetback
would most certainly outweigh any benefits gained. If
Brimelow has thought through preventing such civil
strife, he does not include this in Alien Nation.
As a financial journalist,
Brimelow has done an excellent job of mustering up and
analyzing statistics. And, he has done his homework
when it comes to reporting the history of immigration
legislation. Some of his original reporting is
entertaining, while scoring some points with
immigration opponents and possibly inciting some
readers. Consider Brimelow's request to emigrate to
China, which is among the top five countries in number
of immigrants to the United States. A surprised
Chinese official responds to the request: "China
does not accept any immigrants. We have a large enough
population."
Even granting Brimelow the luxury
of indulging in incendiary rhetoric, however, there is
a flaw in Alien Nation Brimelow does not give America
due credit He fails to acknowledge that reshaping
America to fit his ideological mold would, in fact,
destroy what has made America unique.