Novemeber 11, 2003
Australia’s Hanson: She’s Back!
By R. J. Stove
[Also by R.J. Stove:
Pauline Hanson—Political Prisoner]
When
Mrs. Gandhi returned to power in a 1980 landslide,
Sydney’s Sun-Herald summed up her achievement in
three words: “INDIA: SHE’S BACK.”
Of
Australian politics in late 2003, it can similarly be
said, “SHE’S BACK.”
“She”
is anti-immigration insurrectionary Pauline Hanson,
freed
from her Brisbane cell late on November 6—along with
her One Nation Party co-founder David Ettridge—after 78
days’ imprisonment.
As I
reported here in August, Hanson was sentenced to the
astonishing term of three years’ jail on an alleged
technical violation of election law. Now the Queensland
Court of Appeal has
overturned the original conviction and announced
that there will be no retrial. The appeal judges
accepted that all One Nation’s accredited supporters
were de facto registered members of the
party—just as the defense had
maintained from the start.
Pauline herself is, of course, ecstatic. “The
truth has set me free,” she told
reporters. Throughout her incarceration, she had
been
forbidden all physical contact with visiting
relatives—including her ill 84-year-old father—unless
she was strip-searched. Contrast this with the
indulgence shown to triple murderer
Paul Denyer, who last May launched a taxpayer-funded
crusade for
the right to wear makeup in his Melbourne cell.
No-one can say Australia’s
New Class doesn’t have its
priorities straight.
Pauline’s imprisonment even drew criticism from
Australian Prime Minister
John Howard and other leading Australian
politicians—such as New South Wales Premier [= governor]
Bob Carr. Evidence of the extreme
Establishment anguish that Hanson causes, Queensland
judge Margaret McMurdo, while freeing Hanson, took the
opportunity
to complain that these criticisms “could
reasonably be seen as an attempt to influence the
judicial appellate process and to interfere with the
independence of the judiciary for cynical political
motives.”
Whither Pauline now?
Because her original conviction has been quashed, she
has a
legal right to stand for Parliament again. She
herself has
scorned the idea with her celebrated command of
colloquial
Australian (“I’d need rocks in my bloody head if
I thought about it again”). But a TV opinion poll
conducted by Melbourne’s Channel 10 on November 7 found
that 78% of respondents hoped Pauline would return to
politics.
Others
certainly hope not. Sydney Morning Herald
correspondent and Hanson biographer
Margo Kingston reported one reaction from reader Tim
Evans, under the provocative headline
“Hanson—the left’s new poster girl?”:
“Will Pauline rise again? That’s the question
everyone is asking. It’s the hot topic of conversation
at work here today [Friday]. Me, I think not - I
think she’s dead and buried. Listen to what she’s been
saying—the bleeding-heart stories about all people in
prison being innocent.
“Her 11 weeks in jail have turned her into a soft,
left-leaning namby-pamby.
“Listen to her language. She’s become the very thing
her core constituents hate. Her time in jail has taken
away her tough-on-crime, pro-‘Laura Norder’ stance. So,
after the current sympathy thing subsides … [t]he
left will still hate her, and she’s about to alienate
the right in a big way. She’ll be left with no support
whatsoever.”
Perhaps Pauline will develop an interest in prison
reform, like Nixon enforcer Charles Colson after
Watergate. But, as Melbourne’s Sunday Age veteran
columnist Michelle Grattan
noted:
“Even when she's out of politics with her future
totally up in the air, Pauline Hanson can cause an
extraordinary amount of trouble for the most senior of
politicians. … Hanson is a political firecracker, and
that sends a lot of players into real or contrived
spins. Just when they thought she was an absolutely
spent force, she produces yet another spray of sparks.”
Already the fear of a Hanson Rising in her home state of
Queensland has spooked Labour Party Premier [= governor]
Peter Beattie—a sort of antipodean Tony Blair, smirking,
smooth, modish, publicity-obsessed, contemptuous of
old-style working-class mores—into
accepting the resignation of the State Justice
Department’s Director-General , Ken Levy, as fall guy
for the
failed prosecution. For the first time since Beattie
won office five years back, he and his government
actually look like potential losers in the state
elections due 2004.
The
other conspicuous casualty of a Pauline comeback is on
the (nominal) Right: Federal Health Minister
Tony Abbott, once considered the Great White Hope of
Prime Minister Howard’s cabinet and heir-apparent. The
aftermath of Hanson’s conviction revealed that Abbott
ran an
anti-Hanson slush fund quaintly-styled, “Australians
for Honest Politics.”
Abbott’s grudge against Pauline goes back at least to
1998, when his staffer
David Oldfield—now a One Nation member of the New
South Wales legislature’s upper house—jilted him to
become Pauline’s chief confidant. "Even the best of
us," Abbott
complained at the time, "get saddled with
our own personal Judas." The Sydney Morning
Herald’s Margo Kingston
concluded: “He [Abbott] can say goodbye to ever
being Prime Minister.”
In
Pauline’s future, the biggest imponderable is her
relationship with
the One Nation party itself. It is indubitably
down from its 25% popularity levels in 1998. In
Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia, the party now
hardly exists.
But it
is
not yet out. It still has representatives in the
Parliaments of New South Wales, Queensland, and Western
Australia, as well as one Senator—Queenslander
Len Harris—in Canberra. Pauline herself could gain
a Senate place, under Australia’s proportional
representation system, with as little as 14%, and
possibly even 7%, of the vote.
Even
if Pauline cannot translate public sympathy over her
maltreatment into a revived political force, the mere
possibility tells Australian incumbents: “Be
afraid. Be very afraid.” It puts Australia’s major
parties in the position once jeeringly invoked by that
boisterous proto-Hansonista,
George Wallace, when
marshalling voters three decades ago: “You can
send them a message. You can give 'em a case of
St. Vitus Dance, and you know how to do it.”
All
over the
Western world, elites are suppressing
popular resistance to
nation-breaking immigration. The story of Pauline
Hanson will be repeated again and again.
R. J. Stove [send
him mail] lives in Melbourne, Australia. His recent
book
The Unsleeping Eye: Secret Police and Their Victims
has made a dizzying leap on the Amazon bestseller list
from #817,651 to #703,513. Articles by him have appeared
in
The American Conservative,
The New Criterion, and
Chronicles. Nobody has asked him to join Pauline
Hanson’s political campaign.