January 06, 2005
The Silly Sex?
By
Ilana Mercer
[Recently by Ilana Mercer:
Muslim Immigration Time Bomb Ignored by American Jews]
In his recent monumental work,
Human Accomplishment, Charles Murray came up
with
4,002 subjects who, as a Times Literary
Supplement reviewer put it, “dragged their fellow
men out of wattle-and-daub hovels and pushed them into
space rockets.”
Of special interest is that women comprise only two
percent of these
achievers: Six physicists,
four mathematicians, five astronomers and
thirty-seven entrants for Western Literature. There were
no women philosophers of distinction and no front-rank
composers.
In fairness, the legal emancipation of women only began
in earnest in the 19th century—a situation that
parallels the predicament of the Jews.
“Until the end of 18C
throughout Europe, and well into 19C in most parts of
Europe,”
writes Murray, Jews “lived under a regime of
legally restricted rights and socially sanctioned
discrimination as severe as that borne by any population
not held in chattel slavery.”
But where have women been since 1950? Over the last five
decades women, who make up roughly 50 percent of the
world's population, have claimed only 2 percent of the
Nobel Prizes in the sciences. In literature, women
have claimed only 8 percent. No woman has won a Nobel in
economics.
During that period Jews, who comprise less than 0.5
percent the world's population, have claimed 32 percent
of the Nobel Prizes for medicine, 32 percent for
physics, 39 percent for economics and 29 percent
of all science awards.
One possible explanation for this discrepancy:
the alleged greater variability in men’s intelligence.
The “Bell
Curve” of their IQ distribution seems to be less
bunched around the median IQ than that of women. They
are, consequently, more likely to enjoy very high but
suffer very low IQs.
The subjects in which so few women have demonstrated
excellence require particularly high IQs. And
women, so the theory goes, simply have
fewer high IQs.
However,
Professor Richard Lynn, co-author of
IQ And The Wealth Of Nations, argues that
men enjoy an advantage in average IQ—their median may be
as much as five points above that of women. This means
that there are even more high IQ men than women. At an
IQ of 145 there are about ten men to one woman.
The other popular but less credible explanation
involves the equal-but-different
approach to aptitude. Men are better at math,
spatial and mechanical reasoning; women at verbal
skills. Women’s mathematical reasoning might not be as
good as men’s on average but women, according to this
theory, make up for it with superior verbal fluency and
artistic flair.
Lynn, working from his developmental theory of sex
differences in intelligence, demonstrates that while men
do enjoy the aforementioned advantage, adults are, on
average, equal in verbal ability, with one minor
exception: women are better at spelling and foreign
languages.
Women’s relatively scant accomplishments in the second
half of the 20th century as quantified
objectively by Murray certainly puts meat on the bones
of Lynn’s findings.
Since 1950, women have won only five Nobels in
literature. And some of those are questionable. How can
one put
Toni Morrison into the literary company of
Patrick White,
Albert Camus, and
Isaac Bashevis Singer?
In past years, the literature prize went to authors of
the caliber of
J. M. Coetzee,
Günter Grass, and
V.S. Naipaul.
But last year, Austrian writer
Elfriede Jelinek was awarded the literature prize.
I’m not suggesting the grumpy Jelinek is a fraud like
Guatemalan leftist and Peace Prize winner
Rigoberta Menchu. Some of Jelinek’s dusty
works, translated crudely into English, showcase some
skill (if one can stomach the contrived subject matter).
However, unlike her male predecessors, she is better
known for
politically correct posturing than for penning
memorable works of literature.
Questions also surround this year’s choice for the most
prestigious prize in medicine. I personally doubt
whether Linda B. Buck’s olfactory discoveries warranted
a
Nobel (shared with Richard Axel). For example, this
year’s Nobel winners in Chemistry—two
Israelis and one American—appear to dwarf the Buck
and Axel smell sensation.
Was the committee compelled perhaps to showcase
at least one female scientist?
To overcome the shortage of women in male-dominated
professions, some institutions are stacking the deck.
Statistician
La Griffe du Lion has
documented the campaign to make entry into
engineering schools easier for women. To overcome the
advantage that men have on the crucial mathematical
reasoning sections of the admission tests, educational
administrators are devising subtle ways to lower
standards.
On a lighter note, look at the zany world of reality
television—as presented in this scene from the first
season of
The Apprentice.
The task confronting the two competing teams was to
refurbish and rent out two apartments. The team
leaders—Katrina Campins and Troy McClain—were vying for
the best apartment. Campins, tart and schoolmarm rolled
into one, is a real estate “expert,” but is
unsure which apartment is the better bet.
Although it is unclear to what avail, Campins decided
that she and her rival would write down and then
exchange their respective choices. Troy McClain, who had
been watching her closely as she brainstormed (or
infarcted) for the camera, smiled amiably and complied.
When Campins opened McClain’s note, she went berserk. He
had effortlessly outsmarted her: “I want what you
want,” McClain had written.
Then and there he figured out how to claim the prized
pick by picking the professional’s brain.
Of course,
The Apprentice candidates constitute a
restricted sample, chosen for a combination of looks and
status.
Despite this, the disparities in character and cerebral
agility between the men and the women could not be more
glaring. An obviously déclassé act, the women
would have been utterly risible if they were not so
revolting.
I
sincerely hope The Apprentice is not an accurate
reflection of the crème de la crème of
up-and-coming distaff America.
As a measure of woman, the Nobel Prize is depressing
enough.
Ilana Mercer [email
her] is a
columnist for
antiwar.com and the
author of
Broad Sides: One Woman’s Clash With a Corrupt Culture,
the
Foreword to which was
written by
Peter Brimelow.