New York’s Other New Economy
By William Fronhoefer
"Even
after a very long boom that has created a
half-million jobs here since November 1992, most of
our teens still can't find work," said [Alan
Hevesi], who is seeking the democratic mayoral
nomination.
New
York’s low youth-employment rate is not the fault
of lazy teens, Hevesi said.
--
TIMES ARE LEAN FOR N.Y. TEENS: HELP BIZ HIRE KIDS:
HEVESI, by Dan Mangan
New York
Post;
New York, Mar 26, 2001. [http://pqarchiver.nypost.com/nypost/
Search:Hevesi]
The New
York Post recently reported some interesting
employment data, data compiled by the office of New
York mayoral hopeful Alan Hevesi, City Comptroller.
It seems that joblessness among New York City
teenagers is at record highs – some 80% of area
teens are unemployed.
The Post
finds this puzzling.
So does the Comptroller’s Office.
After all, New York City’s economy (unlike
upstate New York’s) has been in an almost decade-long boom.
It seems odd that a local economy which is
leading the nation in job creation would have so
little to offer teens.
Mr. Hevesi does offer one possible
explanation, though: "We have had booming
growth with high-tech jobs and professional jobs,
but we don't have an entry-level job economy."
A fascinating theory.
However, it seems hard to believe that a city
which has more restaurants, retail stores and small
businesses than any other city in America would be
lacking an “entry-level job economy.”
After all, all these brand new high tech
workers are presumably eating out, buying clothing
and groceries and spending their discretionary
income on any number of retail goods.
And what kind of jobs do New York teens do,
anyway? When I was a New York teen, I bussed tables, washed dishes,
worked as a sales assistant at a lumberyard and at a
pharmacy as well as doing some landscaping work,
among other things.
Moreover, I worked those sorts of jobs in the
darkest days of the Dinkins mayoral administration,
when the city was hemorrhaging all sorts of jobs,
taxes were out of control and the high tech boom was
years from realization.
No, Alan Hevesi’s explanation is patently
false and disingenuous.
But in all fairness to him, it has to be,
since he is running for political office.
Allow
me to offer a more plausible theory.
The 2000 Census revealed that there are
approximately one million more residents of New York
City than there were during the 1990 census. It’s not because New Yorkers have become remarkably more
fertile – it’s because there are hundreds of
thousands of recently arrived immigrants, many of
whom are illegal.
Now every properly peecee New Yorker has an
anecdote about a delivery guy at their local Chinese
takeout joint who has a Ph.D. in mathematics or a
cabdriver from Bangladesh who got the highest
possible score on his country’s Civil Engineering
exam. Let’s
relax our judgment for a minute and pretend these
stories are absolutely true.
If they are, it simply does not matter,
because the vast majority of recent immigrants do
not come from the upper echelons of Asian society
but from the lowest economic demographics of Central
and South America.
They are, for the most part, extremely poorly
educated, lack basic English and mathematical skills
and are untrained for anything except the most
rudimentary unskilled labor.
If you are a native New Yorker, you will
notice that certain things in the city have
drastically changed.
Your waiter is still a bitter, unemployed
actor, but your busboy is no longer a seventeen-year
old kid who rolls his eyes when you ask for more
butter. He
is a thirty-four year-old man who smiles slightly
and shakes his head in incomprehension. Your moving guy is no longer a sixteen year-old metal-head who
discusses the flaws of your stereo system in
excruciating detail, he is a tired forty year-old
with frightening dental work who, although
apologetic when he accidentally breaks your glass
end-table top, is utterly unable to explain his
company’s policy on damages or supply the number
of someone who can.
In effect, the normal job niche for
native-born teens in New York has been inundated
with workers who, unlike American teens, will work
for almost nothing, will work more than part-time
during the school year and will not be quitting in
three months to go to college.
The effect of this phenomenon on New York
teens is quite serious, since, according to Mr.
Hevesi: "When teens work, they learn important
skills and behaviors that help them build their
careers. Working also lets them earn the money many
need to go to college or help support their
families."
In this we are agreed.
Of course, the adult immigrants who have
wrested the traditional teen job market from teens
often won’t be helped in building careers, since
part of their attractiveness to employers is that
they don’t need to be promoted or given raises -
they can be immediately replaced by a brand new cholo
who has just sneaked across the border.
Few behaviors are being learned by employees
now – rather customers are being forced to learn
Spanglish so they won’t have to spend fifteen
extra minutes explaining themselves every time they
shop or grab lunch at a restaurant.
Few of the dollars earned by these workers
are going toward college educations and the money
that is spent to support families is being sent to
various foreign countries – it is not entering the
local economy.
And it’s not as if this disappearing
employment, which is shortchanging so many
native-born teens, is providing the offspring of
these workers with golden opportunities.
Hispanic teens are roughly three times as
likely as black teens to drop
out of high school and almost six times as likely as
white teens to do so.
Additionally, their illegitimacy rate is
skyrocketing.
The
children of our Gastarbeiter
class are hardly making the most of the
opportunities that their parents have snatched from
native-born teens.
And
even if they were, it would be no cause for joy that
our own children were being shoved aside.
April 04,
2001