December 17, 2004
WAR
AGAINST CHRISTMAS 2004 COMPETITION
[I]
[II]
[III]
[IV]
[V]
[VI]
[VII]
[VIII]
[IX]
[X]
[XII]
[XIII]
[XIV]
[XV]
[XVI]
[XVII]
[XVIII]
[XIX]
[XX]
- See also: War
Against Christmas
2003,
2002,
2001,
2000
War Against Christmas 2004 Competition [XI]:
Resistance To Khristmaskampf Going Mainstream!
The last time I spoke of
my
love
for Bill O’Reilly I received a stack of
dissenting emails…mostly from men, interestingly enough.
However, Bill O’Reilly is one of today’s entries for the
War on Christmas competition. I fully admit my
partiality.
The O’Reilly Factor has a segment called The Most
Ridiculous Item Of The Day. As reported on the Fox
website (December 17—scroll down):
“The Most Ridiculous
Item of the Day
“In Jacksonville,
Florida, we have lots of ‘Factor’ viewers. Judge
Patricia Faucet [BB note:
sic—a
joke!]
has ordered a Christmas tree removed from the courthouse
down there, but a snowman can stay.
“Even though the
Christmas tree contained no religious ornaments, the
judge said she just wanted to make sure no one would be
offended, so the tree was chopped.
“Hey, Judge, here's a
clue. I'm offended! And I think most people in
Jacksonville are not only offended, they think you're a
pinhead. Put the tree back.
“To not do so would
be ridiculous. It's happening all over the place...”
He called her a pinhead. Only Billy!!
In helpful VDARE.COM fashion, we found the email address
for Judge Patricia C. Fawsett, Chief United
States District Judge in Jacksonville, Florida…just in
case you have anything you want to tell her. Click
here for her District Court comments page.
[PermaLink] [Top]
More Mainstream Resistance!
[James
Fulford]
“A fairly new tactic
in the Christmas wars can be called the sensitive
person’s veto. In 2000, the city of Eugene, Ore., banned
Christmas trees on public property, then allowed
firefighters to put up a tree on Christmas Eve and
Christmas, with the provision that if one person
objected, the tree had to come down.”
