|
October 25, 2004
U.S. Department of Homeland Security “Detention
Priorities”
– memorandum by Under Secretary Asa
Hutchinson, 10/18/04
*******
U.S. Department of
Homeland Security
Washington, D.C.
20528

October 18,
2004
Homeland Security
MEMORANDUM TO:
Robert C. Bonner
Commissioner
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Michael J. Garcia
Assistant Secretary
U.S. Immigration and Customs
Enforcement
FROM:
Asa Hutchinson
Under Secretary for Border and
Transportation Security
RE: Detention Prioritization and Notice to Appear
Documentary Requirements
This memorandum provides for the
detention of aliens and outlines documentary
requirements that must be met when transferring custody
of aliens to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE),
Office of Detention and Removal Operations (DRO). The
guidance in this memo supersedes all outstanding
guidance regarding priorities for the detention of
aliens within Border Transportation Security (BTS). All
BTS personnel must adhere to legal authorities and the
procedures set forth below in making decisions regarding
whether to detain an alien. [Footnote 1 – This policy
does not supercede any requirement to release an alien
under Zadvyas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678 (2001) and
implementing guidance in 8 C.F.R. sections 241.4, 241.13
and 241.14 nor does it apply to unaccompanied
juveniles.]
I. Detention Priorities
The following guidelines provide
priority categories for the detention of aliens subject
to detention. An alien being considered for detention
should be placed in the highest numbered priority within
the top category possible (i.e., an alien found to have
a credible fear of persecution with an aggravated felony
conviction would still meet the requirements of
Mandatory, #2). In the case of mandatory detention, the
Director of ICE DRO is to heed the guidelines strictly.
In all other cases, the DRO Director retains the
discretionary authority with respect to allocation of
bed space and other detention-related resources. In
all cases, the DRO Director is to heed these guidelines
to the greatest extent possible when determining
detention priorities.
All such aliens must be detained
unless they fall within one of the exceptions to
mandatory detention. There are not priority designations
among categories of cases subject to mandatory
detention. Questions as to whether a given alien falls
under one of these categories and must be
detained should be directed to local legal counsel.
Mandatory
 | Aliens subject to mandatory
detention under INA 236A [Footnote 2 – Prior approval
of the ICE National Security Unit and the ICE Office
of the Principal Legal Advisor is required before
charges may be brought under either INA section
212(a)(3) or INA section 237(a)(4).] |
 | Aliens in expedited removal (INA
section 235) with limited exceptions [Footnote 3 – Not
all aliens in expedited removal proceedings are
subject to mandatory detention, however. See, for
example 8 C.F.R. sections 235.3(b)(2)(iii),
235.3(b)(5)(i) allowing for parole in limited
circumstances of medical emergency, or where necessary
for a legitimate law enforcement objective.] |
 | Aliens subject to mandatory
detention in removal and deportation proceedings under
INA 236(c) [Footnote 4 – Note that INA 236(c)(2)
authorizes release to provide for protection of a
witness, etc., where the alien does not pose a danger
to the safety of others or to property and is likely
to appear for any scheduled proceedings.] |
 | Aliens who have final orders of
removal subject to mandatory detention under INA
section 241(a)(2), whether ordered removed pursuant to
INA 238 or 240 proceedings [Footnote 5 – This includes
aliens ordered removed under INA 240 and criminal
aliens ordered removed under INA 238. These aliens may
not be released under any circumstances during the
90-day removal period set forth in INA 241(a)(2).
Following the 90-day period, the continued detention
of such aliens should be determined pursuant to
criteria in Zadvyas, supra and
implementing guidance in 8 C.F.R. sections 241.4,
241.13, and 241.14. |
High Priority
- National Security Interest
aliens including aliens who are subject to an ongoing
national security investigation or who, by virtue of
specific information or intelligence specific to the
alien in question raise a national security concern,
as identified either by 1) the Joint Terrorism Task
Force, 2) Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or 3)
by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). [Footnote
6 – ICE and CBP shall track all cases where the two
bureaus disagree on whether a particular alien poses a
national security threat. CBP and ICE shall review
these cases on a quarterly basis.]
- Continued detention of aliens
with final administrative orders past 180 days on
account of special circumstances (i.e. 8 C.F.R.
241.14).
- Aliens who have been issued
final removal orders over 90-days old, where removal
is foreseeable.
- Aliens who present an
articulable danger to the community (claimant
agency must be able to articulate the danger).
- Aliens who exhibit specific,
articulable intelligence-based risk factors for
terrorism or national security concern not solely
based on the alien’s race, ethnicity, nationality or
religion (as identified by either 1) the Joint
Terrorism Task Force, 2) Immigration and Customs
Enforcement, or 3) by U.S. Customs and Border
Protection.
- Aliens associated with ongoing
significant criminal investigations.
- Remaining criminal aliens not
subject to [INA section] 236(c).
- Aliens whose detention is
essential to national border enforcement initiatives.
Medium Priority
- Suspected alien and narcotics
smugglers
- Aliens who committed fraud
- Inadmissible, non-criminal
aliens (other than expedited removal cases)
Lower Priority
- Worksite enforcement arrests
- Final orders (beyond 179 days –
not likely to remove)
- Aliens placed in expedited
removal found to have a credible rear and referred
for full 240 proceedings
- Other aliens not subject to
required detention.
II. Documentary requirements
Each component must ensure
apprehended aliens are processed efficiently and placed
in the appropriate and most expedient removal process.
(e.g. stipulated, reinstatement, administrative,
expedited) At a minimum, the following documents must
be completed by the apprehending entity and presented to
DRO to ensure each case moves swiftly through the
removal process:
[15 items – not transcribed]
To ensure maximum efficiency in the
use of the Department’s finite detention bed
resources, it is imperative that this documentation
is prepared and presented. Custody responsibility will
not be transferred to ICE/Detention and Removal
Operations (DRO) until ICE-DRO verifies that all of the
above required documentation has either been provided or
has been waived by an ICE/DRO authorizing official at
the detention site. The arresting or delivering officer
will ensure that detainees turned over to the custody of
ICE/DRO are accompanied by any personal items, identity
documents, baggage and/or prescription medications in
that detainee’s possession at the time of arrest.
The requirements I issued in my
memorandum of March 30, 2004, Guidance on ICE
Implementation of Policy and Practice Changes
Recommended by the Department of Justice Inspector
General, remain in effect. You are responsible for
ensuring implementation of these requirements. |
|