|
December 13, 2004
Immigration Scraps Salvageable From 9/11 Act
By
Juan Mann
The
once-great real immigration reform provisions of
H.R. 10, newly hatched as The Intelligence Reform and
Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, are now mostly gone. But the
immigration patriots’ resistance in Congress forced the
Bush Administration to spend so much political capital
that independent observers now question its ability to
pass its mad amnesty/ guestworker proposal.
And there are still scraps to be
salvaged from the wreck.
The bad news: Gone are the
prohibitions on
illegal alien driver’s licenses. Gone also are the
desperately needed summary removal provisions of a
full-strength
Section 235(b) of the Immigration Act—my personal
favorite. There is talk they’ll be
reintroduced next year. But for now, the 9/11 bill
does nothing to actually
deport aliens.
That’s important, because our
immigration problem is not simply “securing the
border.” The problem is the federal immigration
bureaucracy itself. As I’ve written extensively, all
roads for real immigration reform lead to the litigation
morass of the Justice Department’s
Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) which
permits endless
immigration litigation in the federal courts.
In order to set up a system that actually deports
lawbreakers, the federal government must:
1)
give immigration officers the power to do their
jobs, that is, remove illegal aliens who have no damn
business being in the United States anyway, and
2)
not make a
federal case out of it.
The good news?
The legislation still retains some good stuff (i.e.
-- immigration scraps) covered in its Title V – “Border
Protection, Immigration, and Visa Matters.” For
example:
 | Sections 5101-5: A “pilot
program to test various advanced technologies that
will improve border security between ports of entry
along the northern border of the U.S.” including
“sensors, video, and unmanned aerial vehicles”
with a report to Congress of what happened after one
year. |
 | Sec. 5201: A “comprehensive
plan for the systematic surveillance of the southwest
border of the U.S. by remotely piloted aircraft” .
. . but only after the DHS actually comes up with the
plan in six months, and after Congress and the
President review the plan it will be implemented
“as a pilot program as soon as sufficient funds are
appropriated.” |
Will cameras and sensors make
America safer?
Not by themselves. As T.J. Bonner,
President of the National Border Patrol Council recently
opined on the
Terry Anderson radio show (November 14, 2004):
“[T]hese
eyes and ears
[cameras and sensors] are great, don’t get me
wrong Terry, but they don’t catch a single soul. I’ve
never seen one of those cameras jump down off the pole
and catch an illegal alien.”
But they’ll help.
 | Section 5203: Another 4,000 new
ICE agents over five years—800 new DHS immigration
investigators [probably for ICE, but it doesn’t
specify] who will investigate “violations of
immigration law” each year from 2006 to 2010. |
 | Section 5204: Another 40,000
immigration detention beds over five years—8,000
increase in “the number of beds available for
immigration detention and removal operations of the
DHS” each year from 2006 to 2010. But the catch:
the DHS Secretary (definitely not
Bernard Kerik) will give
detention priority for these new beds to
Immigration Act
Section 237(a)(4) cases—defined as aliens
removable for national security, terrorism, foreign
policy dangers, espionage, genocide, and membership in
the former Nazi government of Germany (but, curiously,
no Communist government). Foreign policy trumps
immigration policy. |
 | Section 5301: In person
interviews of visa applicants by State Department
consular officers abroad. |
Using Consular Officers for the job
is a good thing, according to Joel Mowbray:
“One
provision opposed by the State Department, though, was
requiring that all nonimmigrant visa
applications—meaning those for temporary travel to the
United States — must be ‘reviewed and adjudicated by a
consular officer.’”
“What now happens in many consulates and embassies is
that although the visa may be physically stamped by a
consular officer, most of the legwork is done by Foreign
Service Nationals, local residents who work at the post.
These workers pose grave security risks, particularly
since their fraud is often punished by mere slaps on the
wrist — if at all.” [“Security
Lost and Found,” by Joel
Mowbray, The Washington Times, December 10,
2004].
 | Section 5304: The State
Department can revoke visas at any time, and aliens
can’t sue in federal court to get them back. The bill
does it by amending the authority under
Immigration Act Section 221(i) by adding the
following language: “There shall be no means of
judicial review (… or any other habeas corpus
provisions) of a revocation under this subsection,
except in the context of a removal proceeding
[that’s the EOIR Immigration Court system again] if
such revocation provides the sole ground for removal
under
Immigration Act Section 237(a)(1)(B) (alien
present in the U.S. without inspection).” The
bill also creates a new ground of removability: aliens
with revoked visas. |
 | Section 5401: Increased
penalties for alien smuggling, transporting aliens in
groups of 10 or more, endangering the aliens’ lives,
or if “the aliens presented a life-threatening
health risk to people in the U.S.” |
In lieu of midnight basketball,
Section 5401 of the bill also includes this curious
“Outreach Program” –
“The
Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the
Attorney General and the Secretary of State, as
appropriate, shall develop and implement an outreach
program to educate the public in the United States
and abroad [my italics] about the penalties
for bringing in and harboring aliens in violation of
this section.”
Brace yourself for taxpayer-funded
Spanish billboards south of the border. Maybe Vicente
Fox has a buddy in the advertising business.
 |
Section 5402: A new ground of deportation—aliens who
have received
military-type training from terrorist organizations. |
 |
Section 5403: A study and report by the Comptroller
General within 270 days on terrorists in the asylum
system, including “the extent to which
weaknesses in the U.S. asylum system
[State Department,
DHS and EOIR] and withholding of removal system
[that’s the EOIR
Immigration Court again!] have been or
could be exploited by aliens connected to, charged, in
connection with, or tied to terrorist activity.” |
Really? To save the Comptroller General some legwork, I
humbly suggest reviewing the
Juan Mann Archive
right here on
VDARE.com for my
past articles on
known terrorists, the
EOIR Immigration Court and the phony
credible fear review process.
You heard it here first!
All this is OK. But only OK.
Three years after September 11th,
with one commission, two wars abroad, and one gigantic
new
bureaucracy… and the U.S. government still won’t
bolt the door.
Juan Mann [send him
email] is a lawyer and the proprietor of
DeportAliens.com. |
|