April 10, 2003
A Pro-War Column: Persistent Pockets Of Media Resistance
By
Michelle Malkin
[VDARE.COM
note: As we’ve
said before, we
carry Michelle’s syndicated column because she does
unmatched
original research on immigration – and because we
don’t take a position on the war. Readers who feel
less forbearing should
email her – not us!]
The anti-war grouches, naysayers, and quagmirists in the
mainstream media were so, so sure there would be no
jubilation at the Iraqi liberation.
When
Vice President Dick Cheney promised on NBC’s Meet the
Press that “We will be greeted as liberators,”
Newsweek’s anonymous “Conventional Wisdom” column
writers
sneered that Cheney’s remark was
“An arrogant blunder for the ages.”
When
deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz
predicted that the Iraqis
would welcome a U.S. invading force, The
Nation’s Eric Alterman
sniffed: “Is Wolfowitz really so ignorant of
history as to believe the Iraqis would welcome us as
‘their hoped-for liberators’?
In an article headlined
“Panic in the White House,” writer Andrew Stephen of
the New Statesman sniped: “And they
thought it was going to be so easy. They really did
believe it: that troops would be welcomed in Iraq, with
flowers and hugs and kisses, as
liberators for whom they had been waiting so long.”
Quentin Peel of the Financial Times added
gloomily: “The danger for Mr. Bush is that he will
win the war, eventually and unpleasantly, but he will
never be seen as a liberator.”
Nicholas D. Kristof of the New York Times
opined: “[I]f this isn't Vietnam, neither is it
the Afghanistan campaign, where Americans were hailed as
liberators.
I was in Afghanistan during that war, and the difference
is manifest. Afghans were giddy and jubilant, while
Iraqis now are typically sullen and distrustful and
thirsty.
And
while co-hosting ABC’s “Good Morning America,” Diane
Sawyer
derided: “What happened to the flowers expected
to be tossed the way of the Americans? Was it a terrible
miscalculation?”
This
week, as all the world has now seen, the flowers were in
full bloom. Jubilation rocked the streets. Coalition
troops were showered with petals, kisses, and hugs from
Basra in the south to central Baghdad to the
northern-most cities of Iraq. Here are just a few of the
captions that accompanied the tender and telling photos
taken across the liberated country:
No
flowers for you, Diane.
These buoyant pictures of liberation are worth a
thousand of the quagmirists’ dreary words.
But even
as Baghdad crumbled and Iraqis rejoiced in the streets,
the pockets of liberal media resistance persist.
ABC’s
Peter Jennings grumbled that the mass of Iraqi citizens
gathered in Baghdad to cheer the toppling of a Saddam
Hussein statue was
“a small crowd.” (A phrase better applied to the
dwindling audience for Jennings’
phenomenally biased nightly news broadcasts.)
The
Los Angeles Times, meanwhile, downplayed the dancing
in the streets, and instead amplified the seething
resentment of the Arab media establishment—citing
Saddam’s apologists at the Arab News and Egypt’s Al
Wafd newspaper—to prove that
“many see occupation, not liberation, of Iraq.”
The
surly opponents of Operation Iraqi Freedom can spin, but
they can’t hide the simple, Kodachrome-colored truth:
Tyranny brings only
misery. Liberation kindles
joy.
Michelle Malkin [email
her] is author of
Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists,
Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces to Our Shores.
Click
here for Peter Brimelow’s review. Click
here for Michelle Malkin's website.
COPYRIGHT
CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.