September 28, 2004
John Kerry: Mr. Perfect for President?
By
Michelle Malkin
TV cameras are brutally unforgiving—especially during
high-stakes election debates. They amplified the
angst on
Richard Nixon’s brow, the inexperience in
Dan Quayle’s eyes, and the vulgarity of
Al Gore’s visage.
How will Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry
hold up under the spotlight? What will the cameras
reveal?
Beneath the
Christophe-coifed hair, unnaturally taut skin, and
artificially enhanced tan, there are some
naked attributes Kerry cannot conceal:
His spite. His haughtiness. His condescending core.
John Kerry detests his opponents. He detests his own
staff. He detests anybody and anything that interferes
with his political ambitions.
Since
returning from Vietnam, his main contribution to
public discourse has been
contempt, not courage. He possesses resentment, not
hope. He does not inspire. He sulks.
Much has been
said about Kerry’s superior argumentative skills. He
was a champion debater at Yale; his former Republican
opponents in Massachusetts have effusively praised his
quick recall and rhetorical agility.
This will no doubt impress the like-minded lefties in
America’s
newsrooms and
Hollywood salons. But in America’s living rooms, a
man’s unvarnished character—how he carries himself, how
he treats others, how he responds to adversity—speaks
volumes over the stilted platitudes and smoothly
memorized factoids that come out of his mouth.
This isn’t a race for prom king or
Jeopardy! champion. It’s a race for leader of the
free world.
Throughout the course of the campaign, Kerry has
demonstrated a holier-than-thou hubris that continues to
alienate
security moms,
Reagan Democrats, and
swing voters of all backgrounds.
It’s not just his disingenuous
vacillation on foreign policy (he was for the war
before he was against it, but he’d vote the same
way) that bothers folks.
It’s not just the Kennedy-esque photo-ops of Kerry in
athletic settings that scream vanity instead of vigor.
It’s the ugly little things that pile up and create
the indelible image of a Royal Jerk:
Now,
according to Monday’s
New York Times:"Senator John
Kerry's campaign said yesterday that Mr. Kerry did not
own a Chinese assault rifle, as he was quoted as saying
in Outdoor Life magazine, but a
single-bolt-action military rifle, blaming aides who
filled out the magazine's questionnaire on his behalf
for the error."
This is the paragon of strong moral leadership who
will bring victory in the War on Terrorism and restore
America’s values?
This Botox-ed egomaniac? This serial waffler? This
ruthless buck-passer?
Proverbs 18:12 counsels: "Before destruction the
heart of man is haughty, and before honor is humility."
It’s a lesson Mr.
Perfect will learn too late.
Michelle Malkin [email
her] is author of
Invasion: How America Still Welcomes Terrorists,
Criminals, and Other Foreign Menaces to Our Shores.
Click
here for Peter Brimelow’s review. Click
here for Michelle Malkin's website.
COPYRIGHT
CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.