November 02, 2005
NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON'T want your name and/or
email address published when sending VDARE email.
A Wyoming Roman Catholic
Reader Comments on his church
A Tech Worker Calculates
Specter/Kennedy H-1B Visa Scheme Means $3 Billion Net
Annual Loss To Treasury
From [Name Withheld]
Re: Joe Guzzardi’s Column
“Bill Gates Strongarms Senate Into Selling Out American
Tech Workers”
Joe Guzzardi’s article concerning Congress’ proposed
sale of 30,000 more H1B visas missed an important point.
The salary of a H1B visa holder is usually less than the
salary of an American citizen who performs the same job,
and a lower salary reduces the amount of income that can
be taxed. The lost tax revenue dwarfs the fees charged
for each visa.
It is
against the law for employers to pay lower salaries to
H1B visa holders than the prevailing US citizen
wage, but this
law is not enforced. The department that grants
these visas can't count. In FY 2005, it issued thousands
more visas than it was authorized to grant. I don't
think they are capable of enforcing the law. I doubt if
they are motivated to try.
To quote from
a recent report, "... wages paid to H-1B workers
in computer programming occupations had a mean salary of
$52,312, while the [overall] mean was $67,700; a
difference of $15,388."
Three separately collected sets of taxes must be
added together to compute the loss of federal tax
revenue.
I will only calculate the federal loss of tax revenue
to keep things simple, even though state and local
governments may also tax income.
The difference between the two mean salaries (H1B and
overall) for computer programmers is $15,388. The total
federal tax rate is 40.3% of the salary of a worker, so
the annual loss of tax revenue per H1B visa computer
programmer job is calculated as about $6200.
Other jobs will produce different numbers, but the
theme is the same.
The loss of tax revenue is only partially offset by
the fees charged by the government. The current cost of
a H1B visa is $3185 for a six-year visa. The new bill
will raise this by $500, to $3685. The cost of
administration for each visa is unknown, but this must
be deducted from the fee to properly account for the net
revenue collected for each visa that is issued.
At a rate of $6200 per year, the federal tax revenue
loss over the six-year lifetime of the visa for each
computer programmer job is $37,200. This is more than
ten times the cost of the visa to the employer. The net
loss to the US Treasury is $37,200 minus $3685, or
$33,515.
This figure does not include the costs of
administering the visa. It also does not include the
loss of revenue by local and state governments that levy
income taxes.
If this figure is assumed to be typical for a
H1B visa holder, then the revenue loss to the US
Treasury may be estimated as 30,000 times $33,515, or
$1,005,450,000 over the six years that the visa is
valid.
This is literally a billion-dollar per year blunder.
Congress has already authorized 65,000 visas per year
at a cost of $3185 each. I estimate that this costs the
US Treasury more than $2 billion per year. The new
proposal would change this to a net estimated loss
of over $3 billion per year.
The sponsors of this bill claim that
"increasing the number [of visas] and the fees for them
enabled the Judiciary Committee's proposal to reach
savings of $300 million over five years mandated by this
year's budget agreement." This is the opposite of
the truth. By my rough estimate, this proposal would
increase the national debt by about $5 billion over the
next five years.
Congressional members who suggest that we should
grant more visas to help balance the budget are either
incredibly stupid or deliberately disingenuous.
If the budget rules allow this type of nonsensical
manipulation, then the rules need to be changed before
the entire country shares the same fate as Enron.