September 20, 2006
NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON'T want your name and/or
email address published when sending VDARE email.
09/19/06 -
A California Reader Says Local Southern
California Governments Refuse To Verify Workforce
Eligibility
A Scottish Reader Disagrees With Pat
Buchanan On Islam
From:
Martin Kelly [e-mail
him]
Re: Patrick J.
Buchanan’s Column:
Benedict XVI---On God And The Prophet
As a great admirer of
Patrick J. Buchanan's (I have the great privilege,
for a non-American, of being
linked to his blog), I must respectfully disagree
with his analysis of Islam.
Islam as a whole may indeed be rising—but the “rage,
militancy and intolerance” that Buchanan correctly
notes as its hallmarks are also the sure signs of its
intellectual and spiritual stagnancy and its true
status.
Not so much a faith but a medievalist, barbaric
ideology, Islam can withstand neither spiritual critique
nor secular political competition.
There is no moral or practical difference between the
burning of Papal effigies in
Pakistan and the book burnings held by the Third
Reich, no difference between the Muslim world's
anti-Papal rallies and the exhibitions of Communist
ideological power that those of a certain age might
recall were once held in another stronghold of darkness,
Red Square.
However, in those days men such as
Ronald
Reagan and Buchanan stood athwart history and
shouted, “Stop” as the Red Army was camped on
the plains of Germany. Islam's
immigration-induced presence in the West makes it
more difficult to fight than
Soviet Communism—but instead of so many disparate
voices all saying the same thing, what the West needs
now is a leader who recognizes and is not afraid to
describe
Islam's ultimate evil: the damage it does to
Muslims.
Kelly, whose blog is
here,
formerly practiced law in Scotland. His earlier 2006
VDARE.COM article is
here
and his previously posted letter is
here