June 26, 2005
NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON'T want your name and/or
email address published when sending VDARE email.
“No
Job Is Safe”—A Patent Attorney Reader Reports More
Displacement
A Programmer Reader Chastises
Peter Brimelow For Skilled Immigration Squishiness;
Brimelow Blithers
From: [Name Withheld]:
I recently watched your UVA talk.
(Watch
in RealVideo) One thing that I was amazed
at: how lax you were towards skilled labor immigration,
saying something like "maybe if we let them [the
business lobbies] have their 50,000 computer
programmers, they'll let us contain the rest of it."
First off, we programmers have as
a group been more
negatively affected by immigration
than any other group. The recent trend towards
rampant
insecurity in information systems-and phenomena like
Enron- suggests also
that form of immigration is having effects just as
undesirable for the population as a whole per immigrant
as any form of immigration.
Peter: put yourself in my shoes
for a moment:
H-1b/L-1 expansion meant to me:
1) Two years of unemployment
2) Eventually acceptance of a job
with a more than 60% cut in pay.
Also, the Marxist analysis fails
here. It isn't just economic elites that have
been party to this—political/media elites have
enthusiastically participated. (Old Marxist parties used
to advocate immigration limitation, and the Socialist
International has even been critical of guest workers).
I don't think stopping immigration
is quite as easy as you suggest. Stopping emigration
from Mexico will require disenfranchisement of the
elite that has created the problems in both
countries and almost certainly a
revolution there—I personally support that. The
question: how can the American people contain their own
political,
media and
economic elites?
The current political discourse, in
which everyone from liberals like Ted Kennedy to
conservatives like Trent Lott is utterly
insensitive to the situation of U.S. technologists, is
creating an intensely volatile situation.
Peter Brimelow blithers:
Norm Matloff and
others have pointed out forcefully that, because the
numbers of skilled immigrants are relatively small, I
tend to discount the devastating displacement that they
can cause, as opposed to the grander disaster of mass
unskilled immigration.
My
comment, however, was made in the context of Guest
Worker programs. As a practical matter, I do think that
a temporary Guest Worker program (with appropriate
citizen-child reform) would be useful in
neutralizing the business lobbies. I admit that nobody
in the immigration reform movement agrees with me!