February 03, 2003
NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON'T want your name
and/or email address published when sending VDARE
email.
An
American Reader Defends the British National Party – And
Immigration Reform
A W&L Freshman Reports From The Diversity
Front
From:
Kyle Sulli
Re: Diversity Training
I began my freshman year at
Washington and Lee University, a small liberal arts
college in Virginia, last September. Generally speaking,
W&L is fairly conservative (especially for an American
university—the
Confederate flag is openly displayed by some
students). In my first week here, freshmen had to
participate in several
orientation activities, including a discussion on
alcohol, sex, and drugs, meetings with faculty advisors,
convocation, and the inauguration of our university's
24th president.
But perhaps the most interesting of these activities,
in its own way, was the
diversity seminar. On September 4th (which happened
to coincide with the article by Paul Craig Roberts,
Harvard Hates The White Race?), we were
required to watch a film entitled
Skin Deep. This was a sort of documentary about
several college freshmen from various universities who
were sent to live together in a house for a week or so
to work out their problems with diversity.
For its
genre, the film wasn't too bad—-at least it didn't
hide the outright racist feelings of the minority
students. A funny thing, though: None of the white
students in the film expressed "intolerance," but all
were rather willing to challenge the
stereotypical views with which they had grown up,
and take a verbal lynching from the minority students in
the process. But they at least refused to accept any
sort of guilt for the actions of other and past whites.
(In case you're curious, I found this description of
the video "Skin
Deep". Check out the price! Looks like the
diversity crowd makes a pretty penny. I wonder just
how many copies my university bought?)
Of course, the purpose of this seminar was to
inculcate in us a sense of the need at our particular
institution for more racial, ethnic, cultural, and
religious diversity. Our school is—"deplorably"—composed
of only 12% visible minorities. I'd say that somewhere
near 95% of the student body is at least nominally
Christian.
What I find deplorable, however, is not the lack of
"diversity," but the idea that such racial, etc.,
diversity is a necessity for a good education, even a
good society. In the process of my searching for
colleges, I was not interested in "diversity"
at Washington and Lee so much as I was interested in the
diversity of its course offerings, its academic
standards, and the peculiar
Honor System that is the legacy of Gen. Robert E.
Lee's
presidency of this institution following the Civil
War.
I come from Southern California, where "diversity"
runs rampant. I have had and do have several friends
from minority groups. I find it interesting and
enriching to learn about cultures other than my own.
However, I, like many Americans, have no particular
desire to see those foreign cultures come to America and
undermine (what's left of) American culture. It is a
tremendous fault to think that "diversity is our
strength," when the very same "diversity" can be
implicated in so many of the problems our nation
faces today.
I would hate to see racial and cultural tensions come
to the very forefront here, as they have at many public
colleges, and throughout America's cities and towns. As
it is, we hear plenty whining from groups like the
Minority Student Association, who think
Martin Luther King, Jr. Day cannot be properly
celebrated until we have enough people with colored skin
(didn't M.L.K. himself once
say something about not judging on the basis of skin
color?).
I don't want this esteemed university to become a
microcosm of my
home state. But the desire of W&L administrators
[email
them] to be
"respectable" is a serious threat.