January 19, 2007
NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON'T want your name and/or
email address published when sending VDARE email.
01/18/07 -
A Hispanic Reader Says We’re Getting More
Hispanics Whether We Need Them Or Not
A Hmong Reader Writes That
Minorities Are Touchy And Violent—Proposes New
Definition Of Self Defense
From: Mai Lor [send
email]
Re:
Hmong Shooter Picks Wrong Victim
This title of your article is very offensive! How
could you state that the Hmong Shooter picked the wrong
victim! How do YOU know that was really what happened!
His fiancée would of course stick up for him, cause who
is he to her?—da! the fiancée.
If she was covering her fiancée up, she would also be
a partner in the killing. If she was there and the Hmong
shooter wanted to kill him, wouldn't Cha have attacked
his fiancée as well! I really think that these words are
really racial intended and when it comes to racial
tension, Caucasians really pick at minorities thinking
how funny they must be, when in reality, they're asking
for a fight.
What are their real intentions of doing this? Do they
really think that this is fun and just a game? That's
what causes confrontation. What's next, then they think
it's funny to scare the minority off by doing something
stupid like those that
Chai Vang killed. They thought, it must be funny to
fire at the Hmong guy while he's walking away. What does
Chai think, "of course, they're firing at me, they're
trying to kill me." What does he have to do in
return, that's right,
self defense, which would trigger the minority to
fight for himself.
I want to share a very stupid occurrence here in my
town. While on the school bus, a very obnoxious
Caucasian girl got attacked by two Mexican girls. The
Caucasian girl have been picking on the Mexican girls
and they got sooooooooooooooooooo fed up with the
Caucasian girl's stupid brought up life by trying to be
the bully and being soooo proud of herself thinking she
is sooo funny by picking on others just because they are
minorities; they decided to
teach her a very good lesson that her parents would
not teach.
They beat her up in the bus and what comes down to
this, self defense. Should I say, Caucasian bully picks
wrong victims! I think that taught her a very good
lesson and what comes down to this, she wanted to be
beaten up so she could shut up for the rest of her life.
What if they seriously wounded her, that would have been
a very good lesson for racial tension.
I believe that in order to live amongst one another,
we must learn to appreciate other cultures as well. If
parents can not teach their children to behave and if
they misbehave and get taught a lesson that the parents
ignore, parents should be the ones to blame because of
their lack of thought and their ways they've taught
their child, they've caused their child's life in danger
and who should really be at fault, the parents!
America needs to fix this, and the reason why they
can't is because, this whole country, did not belong to
them in the first place. Should I say, they stole it
from the natives. I am an Asian American. Do not
understand the fact that Caucasians seem to think that
they are the only AMERICANS! This is a free country and
we were invited to stay here freely by your government,
if you don't agree - take it with your government, not
our people!
I am Hmong!
James Fulford writes:
The white ex-convict in the case, James Nichols, has
been charged with the murder of Cha Vang, since he seems
to have lied about the circumstances of the fight, and
tried to make it look like he was hunting with an air
rifle, rather than a shotgun. (Ex-convicts aren't
allowed to own real firearms, even to hunt squirrels.)
It is now impossible,
barring a confession by Nichols, to know what really
happened, or who was the aggressor. The racial aspect
of it maybe causing more trouble for Nichols:
“Though friends have said Nichols isn't racist, the
criminal complaint alleges he made some disparaging
remarks about the Hmong while talking with police,
saying that ‘the Hmong group are bad,’ and another time,
in regards to game hunting, said, ‘The Hmong are mean
and kill everything that moves.’ [Nichols
Charged with Murdering Cha Vang,
Jan 17, 2007 by Emily Matesic and Elizabeth Ries,
WBAY.com]
If Nichols was motivated by
racial motives, that will presumably be considered an
aggravating factor. In contrast, when minorities are
motivated by race, it's apparently considered a
mitigating factor, as in the famous
Colin Ferguson "Black Rage" defense:
“Noted criminal defense specialists William M. Kunstler
and Ronald L. Kuby took Ferguson's case. They attempted
to introduce a ‘black rage’ defense on Ferguson's
behalf. They argued that years of living in an
oppressive, race-biased society had so affected
Ferguson's mind that he was not acting willfully when he
opened fire on unarmed commuters.”
But there's no indication
that the white girl who was beaten up by two Mexican
girls had ever done anything violent, just that she
(allegedly) said things that the Mexican girls
considered "obnoxious." Reader Mai Lor's
definition of self-defense seems a little, well,
pre-emptive.