NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON'T want your name
and/or email address published when sending VDARE
email.
“Ramesh”
Comes To Harlem
Is “Gangs” Crypto-Nativist?
[See also
Ganging Up On America by James
Fulford, and Bowen Smith’s
letter on Irish-American rioters
and immigration reformers.
From:
Erik Meyer
“Everyday there are more of us coming, streaming off the
ships… I hear fifteen thousand Irish a week into New York alone, and
we’re afraid of the Natives? Put all of us together, and we’re not a gang,
we’re an army. All our people need is one spark to wake them up.”
-- Amsterdam Vallon (Leonardo DiCaprio).
Martin Scorsese’s Gangs of New York is a
masterpiece of subversion - a story within a story that
achieves through subtlety, perspective and multiple
layers of meaning what a frontal assault could never
have accomplished: a brutal depiction of America being
invaded and ultimately overwhelmed by the “foreign
hordes” streaming out of Ireland and Europe in the
mid-nineteenth century.
Gangs of New York does not “celebrate” the “diversity” mass
immigration brought to America. It depicts an America
pushed to catastrophic collapse, inundated by alien
masses, starving, grasping, tearing the old order down
and setting it on fire. The immigrants live in filth,
degeneracy, and vice, practicing every form of thievery
and skullduggery imaginable upon each other and everyone
else. The Native Chief, Bill the Butcher, takes his
tribute from it all, because “that’s the way you
fight the rising tide.”
It is a world of open warfare between gangs of
foreigners pouring into this country and natives who
refuse to give way, groups irreconcilably locked in a
death struggle. “Your father was trying to carve a
piece of this country out for his tribe…. And I’m not
sure, if he had lived a little longer, if he wouldn’t
have wanted more.” - Walter "Monk" McGinn
(Brendan Gleeson) to
Amsterdam. These are not people fighting for peace and
tolerance. And though they were fleeing the consequences
of conquest and colonization in their own land (“a
war that has lasted a thousand years” “against a
people who thought they could take by right what could
only be brought about by the annihilation of a race”
- Monk) they are not disinclined to “take by
right,” to conquer and colonize, the land of another.
The film opens with a battle between the “Dead Rabbits,”
a coalition of Irish gangs championed by Priest Vallon
(Liam Neeson) and the “Native Americans,” led by William
“Bill the Butcher” Cutting (Daniel Day Lewis) to
determine, in the words of Cutting, “by the ancient
laws of combat, once and for all, who holds sway in the
Five Points, us natives, born here proper, or the
foreign hordes.”
The gangs have at each other gloriously in a battle that
culminates with the Priest falling in single combat to
Bill the Butcher while the Priest’s young son Amsterdam
looks on. The resulting story chronicles Amsterdam’s
attempts to exact “vengeance” for this killing,
ultimately leading to a resurrection of the vanquished,
outlawed “Dead Rabbits” in struggle with the Natives,
against a backdrop of massive political corruption,
social pathology, and tyranny, with New York being blown
up and burned down during the Draft Riots of 1863.
The characterizations are complex, and the performances
magnificent. Daniel Day Lewis walks like a Titan from a
fallen age. Leonardo DiCaprio brilliantly plays a
character as repellent as he is contemptible, speaking
to the movie’s power and uniqueness – Scorsese and
DiCaprio have created a protagonist compelling in his
utter lack of redeeming qualities.
Amsterdam’s drive to avenge his father - the central
plot of the film - is gradually exposed as hopelessly
simplistic and ultimately ignoble.
During the course of Amsterdam’s attempts to ingratiate
himself with Bill, we learn that, while Amsterdam has
only vague memories of his father culled from dreams and
distant youth, the man who venerates Priest Vallon and
what he stood for is - Bill the Butcher. Bill keeps a
picture of the Priest in a place of honor above his
mantle and speaks of him as a great man who shared his
principles, the “only man I ever killed worth
remembering.”
Amsterdam’s desire for vengeance against Bill the
Butcher is ultimately as base as it is preposterous.
His father was killed in open combat, not murdered, by
an adversary against whom fate, faith, land and blood
had irreconcilably opposed him. Murder would have
demanded vengeance, combat on the field of battle does
not - though it may justify a challenge.
But Amsterdam does not choose that path until shamed at
Bill’s hands by his own cupidity. Amsterdam strikes
while Bill is celebrating his victory at the Battle of
the Five Points, honoring, not just his fallen comrades,
but the leader of their enemies. Amsterdam tries to
assassinate Bill with a throwing knife. Bill knocks the
knife away, wounds Amsterdam, and yells to the crowd,
“I’d like to introduce you to Priest Vallon’s son… He
has dishonored a noble name. I took him under my wing,
as my own, and this is how he repays me. He tries to
kill me, not like a man, but like a sneak thief.”
Amsterdam’s scurrilous conduct contrasts sharply with
the code of honor respected by Bill the Butcher. This
gives rise to the (possibly radical) interpretation that
Scorsese has inverted his story - that the
protagonist is NOT the hero. It is the antagonist, grim
and brutal as he must be, who emerges from the screen as
the only man of true integrity, in a debased,
treacherous, cowardly world.
Looking at the film more broadly, it is about blood and
soil, not government. Bill the Butcher and his Natives
see themselves fighting for America, not the government
of the United States, upon which they heap scorn and
view as engaging in its own war of conquest against
Americans: “We should have run a better man against
Lincoln when we had the chance” - Bill,
immediately before throwing his knife into Lincoln’s
forehead on a poster. Later in the film, Bill, and
his men chant “Down with the Union,” and hurl
refuse at an actor playing Lincoln during a rendition of
“Uncle Tom’s Cabin.”
Nobody is fighting for “democracy” either, which is
presented as a fraud manipulated by those in power to
enrich themselves and their supporters. Boss Tweed and
the Tammany machine welcome the Irish as an unending
stream of votes and cheap labor. With the help of the
Irish the Tammany machine steals an election against
Bill’s Nativist candidates, gleefully pulling people off
the streets, forcing them to vote Tammany until they
have “won” by thousands more votes than there are
voters.
Gangs of New York climaxes with the draft riots, in which we
see all of the “Irish, Germans, and Poles,” who
throughout the movie had been pressed or manipulated
into the Union Army, forming the immigrant army DiCaprio
darkly foretold earlier in the film and rising up in a
rampage of fire and chaos.
They kill all the blacks they can find, then head uptown
to attack the old families, looting and wasting like
Sherman marching to the Hudson. The film, a chronicle
of loss expressed through horrific violence, lingers on
two oil paintings, an early American aristocrat, and the
fair, young daughter of one of the original families, as
they ignite, then burn into ash and cinder.
When the Federal government orders its troops to fire on
the crowds and its ships to shell the city, Native and
Irish alike interrupt their fight in horror at what is
happening to the other.
It is hard not to concur with Bill the Butcher - that,
indeed, “Civilization is crumbling.”
January 05, 2003