Show your support by purchasing VDARE.com merchandise. 
VDARE.com's Amazon connection has been restored! Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
From:
Dr. Herbert Chen (e-mail
him)
A
recently released Harvard Medical School study affirms
what I wrote to
VDARE.COM in
an earlier letter.
In
August, I stated that any version of
Obamacare that
includes illegal aliens would be impossible to fund.
Despite President Obama's claim that the
cost of the trillion dollar legislation would be
partially offset by switching to an
electronic
computerized system, I observed that:
"As for
electronic charting, most U.S. hospitals have already
accrued all the economic benefits that computerized
medicine can achieve."
The federal
government is poised to roll out $19 billion in
incentives to physicians if they convert by 2011 to an
electronic health care billing system ($64,000 for each
doctor).
But now the Harvard Medical School confirms what I have
said all along. That is, no matter what
President Obama and the Democratic Congress insist,
computers do not save hospitals money.
After
reviewing the systems at 4,000 hospitals since 2003,
Harvard found that:
"...the
immense cost of installing and running hospital IT
systems is greater than any expected cost savings. And
much of the software being written for use in clinics is
aimed at administrators, not doctors, nurses and lab
workers."
One of the report's authors, associate professor of
medicine
Dr. David Himmelstein,
concluded that for nearly 50 years:
"...
People have been claiming computers are going to save
vast amounts of money and that the payoff was just
around the corner. So the first thing we need to do is
stop claiming things there's no evidence for. It's based
on vaporware and [hasn't been]
shown to exist or shown to be true." [Harvard
Study: Computers Don't Save Hospitals Money,
by Lucas Mearian,
Computer World, November 30, 2009]
Information
about the limited cost effectiveness of computers that
has been common knowledge in the medical world for half
a century has yet to reach the Congress!
As
the Senate continues
aimlessly and endlessly
to debate Obamacare, the crucial issue of denying
illegal immigrants coverage
is still unresolved while vague and erroneous promises
of computerized savings are offered as gospel.
Chen wrote previous letters urging the federal
government not to invite the entire world to America and
about Henry Louis Gates' racism. Read them
here and
here.
[PermaLink] [Top] [Letters Home]
From:
John Sullivan (e-mail him)
Re: James
Fulford's Blog:
Peter Brimelow On The Bruce
Elliott Show At 6:00 AM Eastern
I
heard Brimelow's early morning conversation with
Bruce Elliott
last month on WBAL. Here are my sleepy reactions.
Elliott considers himself
a Libertarian,
but he is of the politically correct variety, unlike
his colleague Ron Smith
who is much more outspoken about immigration.
After Brimelow went off the air, Elliott went on a
monologue where his umbrage at immigration involved only
illegals that offend him by their impudent of
flouting America's laws.
Elliott claimed he would be opposed even to
a brain surgeon, in the unlikely event one were here
illegally. On the other hand, Elliott plainly said that
he welcomes anyone who goes through the process and
comes to America legally regardless of
culture, religion or color.
Unfortunately, Elliott suggested no limit to the numbers
of immigrants America could accommodate. In this regard
Elliott has
plenty of company
and it is what makes him politically correct and
dangerous to his listeners.
But what Elliot and other Libertarians either ignore or
don't realize is that
legal immigrants
create a
huge welfare base, cultural
chaos, conservative dilution, increase
pollution and result in a huge base of new Liberal
voters.
Elliott, like most
Talking Heads,
doesn't cite statistics. He never mentioned that the US
already accepts takes
one million legal immigrants
annually and another half million who come illegally and
stay.
I'm disappointed that Elliott's post-interview reference
to Brimelow only brushed over
VDARE.COM and its
purpose. He mentioned your cite so quickly that if
listeners didn't already know about it, they wouldn't
have understood. Again, Elliott fell victim to political
correct fear inspired by
your enemies.
Another note that may be beyond Brimelow's control.
Because of his
thick accent, I had trouble understanding him.
I don't share
many Americans' susceptibility to thinking a British
intonation marks one as intelligent.
Just think of those leftist twits: Katty
Kay of the BBC, a favorite of the despicable
Chris Matthews
and
Lara Logan,
intrepid South African girl war correspondent, whose
energetic love life has made her the topic of
tabloid fodder.
Thanks to Brimelow for
getting up early
to enlighten us but I think I'll stick with his
excellent writing.
Sullivan, who
retired from the
Aberdeen Proving Ground
says that during his forty years in what he describes as
the Maryland
SSR, he has
"beheld Old Glory become Faded Glory." He adds that
he considers himself a patriot and a secessionist.
Peter Brimelow comments:
My thanks to for this extremely depressing note. I will
have been
in America 40 years next fall but I guess it's not
rubbed off.
As for the Bruce Elliot Show, the
Southern Poverty Law Center-inspired blackout
against
VDARE.COM is so intense that we have to take
whatever we can get.
[PermaLink] [Top] [Letters Home]
From: Ronald
Hamilton (e-mail
him)
Re: Today's Letter:
A New York Reader Says Lou
Dobbs Is Finished
I
could not agree more with letter writer Bill Richardson
who concluded that
Lou Dobbs is
washed up. Dobbs
sounded pathetic
on his radio show earlier this week.
In
fact, Dobbs' language reminded me of RINOs
John McCain and Lindsey
Graham. Some of the words he used regarding
immigration were:
"compromise,"
"rational," and
"realistic."
Since his signature issue of the
illegal alien invasion
developed into a lost cause at CNN, he's decided to
switch sides and join the amnesty treason lobby.
No longer having his television show may have sent Dobbs
into such a severe depression that he will say anything
to get back on
CNN.
[PermaLink] [Top] [Letters Home]