Remember to enter Amazon via the VDARE.com link and we get a commission on any purchases you make—at no cost to you!
A Reader Insists, (At Some Length) That Sean Gabb Is Fighting The Last War
NOTE: PLEASE say if you DON'T want your name and/or email address published when sending VDARE email.
10/14/10 - The Obama Administration Is Planning To Re-Open "Family Reunification" For Refugees.
From:
Matthew
Dunnyveg [Email
him]
Re: Sean Gabb's
article
News
From England: The New Ruling Class And Taxpayer Funded
Brainwashing In "Sindia-Lesbianopolis"
In Mr. Gabb's recent article, he summarily dismisses
cultural explanations for the political problems in
England, yet fails to offer any satisfactory
alternative. Instead, Mr. Gabb indicates that he
thinks the problems Britain suffers from are
"local" in
nature rather than a result of
"cultural
Marxism", while ignoring similar problems throughout
the West.
Cultural Marxism,
more accurately known as
Political Correctness,
is a paradigm. As philosopher of science Thomas
Kuhn
noted,
the value of a paradigm is determined by its ability to
explain problems, and by the consequences of those
explanations when they are implemented. Since Mr.
Gabb peremptorily dismisses the PC paradigm, he cannot
explain the increasingly obnoxious and totalitarian
nature of government not only in England, but indeed in
every Western country. Consequently, these
problems only get worse.
The roots
of Political Correctness partially lie in Marxist
Leninism, which is a fusion of Marx and Russian culture.
There has been a debate in Russia for centuries now on
whether or not it is part of the West. One feature
of Russian culture militating against its inclusion in
the Western cultural community is that the
tsar,
and later the communists, held all rights; ordinary
citizens had absolutely no legal rights, which is
anathema to our traditional Western values. This
state of affairs made revolution in Russia inevitable.
As Marx himself noted, reform is what the elite class
engages in to maintain their hold on power. The
problem then, and the problem now in the West, is that
reform presupposes that ordinary citizens have rights
that must be respected.
Freedom ways and
governing ways
are absolutely products of culture.
The
COMINTERN (1919-1943) established the cultural precedent
of refusing to recognize that average citizens have any
rights. In fact, the social democrats separated
from the communists because they initially refused to
accept this alien notion that only the elites were
entitled to rights. Lenin, and later Stalin, were
able to enforce their will over Western communist
parties with money; funding for communist parties was
absolutely contingent upon toeing Moscow's party line.
Even though communism has
long since ceased
being a political factor to be reckoned with,
deviationism was not permitted then just as it is not
permitted now.
Communism,
which trivializes culture in favor of economic and
political factors, began falling into disrepute in the
wake of WWI when The Revolution failed to materialize,
and received a mortal blow in 1933 when the German
proletariat chose the fascists over the communists.
The
Frankfurt School
in particular began to reject communism's political and
economistic monism in favor of revolution through
radical alteration of Western cultures, and ultimately
their destruction. The destruction of our Western
cultures became obvious to all perspicacious observers
in the 1960's, and continues unabated to this day.
The conventional wisdom declares the reason the American
military does so poorly in the first few battles of a
new war is that they have to get over fighting the last
war and learn to fight the current war. Mr. Gabb
appears not only to be fighting the last war, but the
wars of eighty years ago. It is high time those of
us concerned with national question issues properly
assess the problems that confront us. To
paraphrase
James Carville,
it's the culture, stupid!






