|
|
Invariably, the person whose signature I solicited wasn’t registered. Even though I expected little enthusiasm for the recall process, I was dismayed that so few people are registered. Time after time, people told me they had no interest in politics. They felt disenfranchised and detached from Sacramento. To get one signature, I had to ask 20 people. Most disconcerting of all was that of the 90 signatures I submitted, only the bare minimum of 65 were valid. But, for political junkies, I was pleasantly surprised at the various and often creative ways that the immigration reform message could be conveyed. One of the most valuable resources: the special website set up by the League of Women Voters of California, www.smartvoter.org. In addition to information about the recall candidates, the website provided overviews of Proposition 53 and Proposition 54 as well as registration and polling place information. Equally informative: the California Channel, modeled after C-SPAN, which aired 30 minute taped interviews throughout California. Each of us was asked the same questions. And although no question was directly about immigration, I was able to link virtually all of my answers to immigration’s contribution to California’s social and economic woes. (To see my interview in streaming video, click here.) The major daily newspapers, while focused on the so-called “leaders,” published a complete list of all the candidates and their positions. Two newspapers that stood out – for different reasons – were the Los Angeles Times and the Sacramento Bee. Times staff photographer Brian Vander Brug took creative pictures of the candidates and taped our statements. The photos and statements are online under “Faces of the Recall.” The Bee’s Daniel Weintraub, the California columnist for the newspaper’s editorial page, wrote a daily blog about the election that kept interested parties up to the minute. Gateway sponsored a photo album wherein candidates could take and submit pictures. The albums are arranged alphabetically at Candidate Camera. For those who prefer to get their political information indirectly, the Total Recall Playing Cards – a full deck of 52 – had me as the Eight of Clubs. And there beneath my picture was my message: “I’m running because I am very disappointed. In the 15 or so years since I returned to California, no politicians have been willing to discuss the impact of illegal immigration on California or the impact of illegal immigration on population growth in California.” On Friday, I’ll tell you why I think my very modestly-financed campaign did make a difference in how immigration was covered. I’ll leave you with this thought: based on my face to face conversations with voters and thousands of e-mails received, the electorate does want comprehensive immigration reform—starting today. I have never understood why professional politicians shy away from this issue. Now, after my campaign, I understand it even less. I believe immigration reform will play an even bigger role in Senator Barbara Boxer’s re-election bid in 2004—and the gubernatorial race in 2006. Joe Guzzardi [email him], an instructor in English at the Lodi Adult School, has been writing a weekly newspaper column since 1988. This column is exclusive to VDARE.COM. |
|
The articles on VDARE.com are brought to you by the VDARE Foundation. We are supported by generous donations from our readers. Contributions are tax deductible and appreciated. Contribute...
Copyright © 1999 - 2008 VDARE.com
|