July 19, 2002
Time To Make Language Costs Fall On Immigrants
By
Joe Guzzardi
Whoever said that the road to hell was
paved with good intentions must have had
California public education in mind.
With another school year just
around the corner, teachers are huddling to discuss the
latest “solutions” to hideously low
reading and math scores. Year after year, the
education elites haul out some grand-sounding
mumbo-jumbo to make it look like it is on top of things.
A recent, but now discarded, teaching philosophy was
“Integrated Thematic Learning” which endorsed
“brain-based learning.” This is the kind of
drivel that comes out of a California Department of
Education top-heavy with bureaucrats who have never set
foot into a classroom.
No one is allowed to talk about
what has really screwed up California schools: too many
non-English speaking students, whose
non-English speaking parents do not hold learning in
very high regard.
To rub salt in our wounds, those
same parents consistently and overwhelmingly refuse to
take advantage of the multiple opportunities (paid
for by you and me) to improve their lot and the
fortunes of their children, too.
Let us today consider the
excellent—on paper—
Community-Based English Tutoring (C.B.E.T.) program.
When California voters approved
Proposition 227 in 1998, they also created C.B.E.T.
The authorization to fund C.B.E.T. was buried deep in
the fine print of the controversial program that
ended bilingual education in K-12 classrooms.
C.B.E.T. provides English language
instruction to any adult learner if that adult will sign
a pledge that he will help his child speak English at
home. The adult can also bring his school-age child to
class with him for special tutoring.
Here is how it works: the adult
student goes to
E.S.L. class. There, he receives English lessons
under the supervision of a credentialed, full-time
teacher.
In the meantime, his child goes to
another classroom, supervised by another credentialed
instructor. The child is tutored one-on-one in reading,
math or any other discipline. Or the child can do his
homework with the guidance and encouragement of the
teacher.
This is a classic win-win
situation. The adults need to learn English and their
children need academic intervention. They are mostly at
the
low end of the academic spectrum. And, of course,
the classes are free.
The
Lodi Adult School, with our share of the $50 million
annual C.B.E.T. budget, has purchased new computers and
textbooks and has hired
bilingual teaching aides to make the class as
inviting as possible.
All we need is students.
You may think that the adults would
attend if only for the benefit of their children. But
you’re wrong.
As with all of the other E.S.L.
classes,
only a few straggle in. The C.B.E.T. class starts at
2:30, when the children are dismissed and the parents
are on campus to pick them up. Class ends at 5:30 in
plenty of time for the family to have dinner together.
We ask only a few hours each week.
But it appears we are expecting too much.
And who exactly are we expecting to
learn English? Many are long-time U.S. residents. who
are taking advantage of the
public schools for their children and
social services for themselves. These are the folks
who demand an amnesty.
The vast majority of the people who
need to come to class, but do not, will end up living
longer in the U.S. than their native country. English is
the language of success. Don’t they want to succeed?
And where are these non-working,
non-English speaking parents? By their own admission,
they are across the street from the school watching
novelas.
My C.B.E.T. class at the Clairmont
School is in one of the poorest and most ethnically
diverse neighborhoods in north Stockton. The school’s
enrollment is 50% Asian and 25% Hispanic. We could
fill the room ten times over with non-English speakers.
Instead, it is one-quarter full on a good day.
The Adult School offers more than
ten other sections of C.B.E.T. classes. Most are poorly
attended.
The refusal of non-English speakers
to attend C.B.E.T. classes where the red carpet is laid
out for them is inexcusable. I can think of nothing else
the Adult School could do to make the class more
inviting.
As I have written before, the plain
fact is that there is
little interest
in learning English among this generation of non-English
speakers.
I like the idea the Dutch have come
up with to cope with people who don’t want to learn
their language. In June the
B.B.C. reported that the Netherlands was considering
charging $1,500 for immigrants to take a
mandatory language class. The money would be
refunded upon successful completion of the class.
I’ve been an E.S.L. instructor for
15 years. I’m tired of being left at the altar.
Let immigrants fork over the dough
at their port of entry into the U.S.
A $1,500 deposit, refundable when
they master the language of this country, is chump
change for people who claim to be so eager to start a
better life in America.
Joe Guzzardi [email
him], an instructor in English at the Lodi
Adult School, has been writing a weekly newspaper column
since 1988. This column is exclusive to VDARE.COM.