June 23, 2006
View From Lodi, CA: Feinstein’s Support For Senate
Sellout Gives Mountjoy Chance—Will He Take It?
By Joe Guzzardi
Dianne Feinstein is California’s accidental Senator.
Analyzing Feinstein’s ascent to the
U. S. Senate, one can track a series of unsuccessful
election efforts early in her career that, through one
strange political event after another, ultimately landed
her where she is today: a two-term Democratic incumbent
seeking re-election against Republican challenger and
former state Sen.
Dick Mountjoy.
Nearly forty years ago, Feinstein
won a position on the
San Francisco Board of Supervisors where she
remained for nine years. Feinstein eventually became the
Board’s first female president.
During her tenure, Feinstein lost
two elections for San Francisco mayor. In 1971, sitting
Mayor Joseph Alioto defeated her. And again in 1975,
Feinstein lost a race for a run-off slot to challenge
Mayor George Moscone.
But when
Moscone was assassinated in 1978, Feinstein
automatically became San Francisco’s new mayor.
After being re-elected mayor twice,
Feinstein made an unsuccessful bid in 1990 for
California governor losing to
Pete Wilson.
Then, in 1992, Feinstein won a
special election for the Senate and has been re-elected
in 1994 and 2000.
Summing up, Feinstein has had mixed
success in persuading voters.
Feinstein has other liabilities:
Finally and
most damning for Feinstein is that she has not been
a very effective Senator. On the hot button issue of
immigration and non-immigrant work visas, Feinstein has
been a
disaster.
Feinstein voted
“Yea” on S. 2611, the recent controversial
amnesty/guest worker Senate program enthusiastically
supported by President Bush.
According to a June report by the
Center for Immigration Studies, “Amnesty
Under Hagel-Martinez: An Estimate of How Many Will
Legalize if S. 2611 Becomes Law,” a
minimum of ten million illegal aliens would receive
amnesty and another 4.4 million
family members of illegal aliens living outside of
the US would join their legalized relatives.
And, according to
an analysis of S. 2611 made by
Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Feinstein’s vote
potentially approved
217 million new legal residents in America (a number
equal to 66 percent of the current U.S. population of
295 million people) over the next twenty years by
creating new work visas and raising the caps on existing
visas.
In short, Feinstein’s record,
especially as it pertains to the all-important topic of
immigration, gives challenger Mountjoy reason to hope.
Mountjoy, listed on the ballot as
an immigration control consultant, should go for
Feinstein’s jugular.
Now all but officially dead, S.
2611 was widely criticized on talk radio and on the
Internet as being loosely written legislation that would
open borders and radically change America’s
demographics. Nothing out of Washington, D.C. in recent
history angered Americans more than S. 2611.
As a
co-author of
Proposition 187, the 1994 initiative that would have
denied most state services to illegal aliens, Mountjoy
should make hay out of that.
Even the harshest critics of
Prop.187 agree that it would pass handily again today
and would have
saved California taxpayers billions.
Mountjoy, with nothing to lose,
must run an aggressive, all-out attack style campaign.
And if Mountjoy needs motivation,
he should recall the 2004 pounding Sen. Barbara Boxer
gave former GOP Secretary of State Bill Jones when
Jones ran a lukewarm campaign.
A similar drubbing may await
Mountjoy if he doesn’t take the fight to Feinstein.
Joe Guzzardi [email
him], an instructor in English
at the Lodi Adult School, has been writing a weekly
column since 1988. It currently appears in the
Lodi News-Sentinel.