May 12, 2006
View From Lodi, CA: Why Isn’t Dubya Jawboning Oil Companies?
[Peter
Brimelow writes:
Note to
angry libertarians—I
KNOW
this is heretical and doesn’t acknowledge the market
system’s ability to spur substitution and price
rationing etc. etc. And I KNOW
Public Citizen is
just a
Ralph Nader racket—my Forbes exposes of Nader
are
here and
here. But, as I’ve
repeatedly said, VDARE.COM is a coalition. We agree
only on immigration reform. Joe is a
Democrat. This is his Lodi News-Sentinel
column, which we carry as a courtesy. Please direct all
complaints to
him—or, better, read
tonight’s Guzzardi Exclusive on immigration reform.]
By Joe Guzzardi
In late April, President Bush
ordered his Energy and Justice Departments to inquire if
gasoline prices are illegally manipulated.
Said Bush,
“We’re acting to ensure that there is no price
gouging.”
Among Bush’s other actions on gas
prices, he will ask
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales to send letters to
all 50 state attorney generals to monitor possible price
gouging.
Bush also temporarily suspended
environmental regulations on gasoline that some feel
contribute to rising retail prices.
Bush, according to then-Press
Secretary Scott McLellan, will reaffirm with energy
companies his desire to see more of their swollen
profits re-invested in expanded refining capacity,
developing new technologies and creating alternative
energy sources.
Finally, Bush proposed ending $2
billion in tax breaks for the oil companies as well as—again—opening
the
Arctic National Wildlife Reserve for drilling.
The immediate results: regular
gasoline at my preferred station, Flame MiniMart, has
gone from $3.04 to $3.19.
All of Bush’s posturing is too
little, too late. [
Bush’s
Gas Plan Seen As Too Little, Too Late, by Edward
Epstein, San Francisco Chronicle, April 26, 2006
In American’s battle for fair pump
prices, the best chance is the November election.
Voters, with fuel costs added to a long grievance list,
will determine whether Republicans will control of the
House or not.
If Bush acts decisively, he could
save the beleaguered GOP.
Drivers cannot reconcile gas prices
and oil company profits.
But that doesn’t mean that
oil companies aren’t going to spin it their way.
Exxon Mobil earned
$36.1 billion in 2005; first quarter profits for
2006 were $8.4 billion. In an attempt to justify those
record profits, the company will embark on a massive
public relations campaign to convince skeptical
consumers about the complexities of oil exploration and
production.
Pointing to its $4.8 billion expenditures on capital
investments during the first quarter 2006, Exxon Mobil
will emphasize the positive. But during the same
quarter, it spent $2 billion for dividend payments and
$5 billion for stock buybacks that primarily benefit
company executives. To make matters worse, Exxon Mobil
will spend an additional $6 billion on repurchasing its
own shares during the second quarter of 2006.
"The President is basically getting down on his
hands and knees and begging the oil industry to invest
more in renewables," said
Tyson Slocum, head of the
energy program at
Public Citizen, a Washington, D.C. advocacy group. "That's
just not going to happen. The only way we're
going to solve our energy problems is to compel the
industry through legislation to increase their
investment in renewables."
Slocum says that Bush’s energy proposals are
toothless. Specifically, investigations into price
manipulation are wasted time since the problem is not
illegal but legal manipulation.
With two well-connected oilmen in
the White House—Bush
and
Vice President Cheney—I have to wonder where the
confrontational approach is.
Why won’t Bush pick up the phone to
call
Rex Tillerson, the new Exxon Mobil Chairman to say,
“This ends now?”
History tells us that might work.
John F. Kennedy was as wealthy and his family as
prominent as Bush’s.
But unlike Bush, Kennedy was a
respected leader. When, in 1962, the
steel companies—as powerful then as the oil
companies today—threatened to raised prices an
unprecedented $6 per ton, Kennedy said,
“The
facts of the matter are that there is no justification
for an increase in steel prices… At a time when they
could be exploring how more efficiency and better prices
could be obtained ... a few gigantic corporations have
decided to increase prices in ruthless disregard of
their public responsibility.” [News
Conference, April 11, 1962]
Noting that
the country was waging war in
Southeast Asia, Kennedy demanded from the steel
executives, “a higher sense of business
responsibility for the welfare of their country.”
Kennedy:
“The American people will find
it hard, as I do, to accept a situation in which a tiny
handful of steel executives—whose pursuit of private
power and profit exceeds their sense of public
responsibility - can show such utter contempt for the
interests of 185 million Americans.”
Steel prices
were never increased.
Shouldn’t
Bush use the President’s
persuasive power to demand oil companies to cut back
to 2005 price levels?
Joe Guzzardi [email
him], an instructor in English
at the Lodi Adult School, has been writing a weekly
column since 1988. It currently appears in the
Lodi News-Sentinel.