|
June 24, 2005
View From Lodi, CA: Lodi’s Terrorism Link: Are
Immigrants Loyal?
By Joe Guzzardi
One of Mohammed Atta’s Florida
neighbors, immediately following
9/11, remembered him as "a nice guy, very
intelligent and polite." Atta, we now know, was one
of the masterminds behind the attacks that killed nearly
3,000 Americans.
Neighbors of Waleed Alshehri,
another of the 9/11 terrorists, recalled him as "a
nice guy" who liked video games and rooted for the
Florida Marlins. Alshehri helped Atta crash American
Airlines Flight 11 into the north tower of the World
Trade Center
Abdulaziz Alomari, on board AA #11
with Atta and Alshehri, lived "quietly"
in Vero Beach with his wife and four children.
Nawaf
Alhamzi’s landlord said his tenant was always
"prompt" with the rent. Alhamzi hijacked
American Airlines flight 77 and flew it into the
Pentagon.
A family
who rented a room to Hani Hanjur, another AA #77
terrorist, said he
"was a kind and gentle man" who liked children.
I
thought about these wildly incorrect character
assessments—-compiled by
CBS News—every time I read the dozens of stories
about the five Lodi suspects arrested more than two
weeks ago on terrorism related charges and immigration
violations.
The
stories quoted Lodians about their generally favorable
perceptions of the suspects.
And
while the five in custody are innocent until proven
guilty, when you think about it , the opinions of the
neighbors, family members or
community and
religious leaders regarding the suspects’ character
is not germane.
What
difference, in context of the charges against them, does
it make if someone down the block "never had a
problem"? [Raids
Stun Close Knit Pakistani Community, Emily Bazar and
Christina Jewett, Sacramento Bee, June 8th]
One way
or the other, it simply doesn’t matter. So why report on
what the man in the street thinks when there are so many
more compelling issues to explore?
Neighbors of Lodi Terrorist Suspects Express Surprise at
Arrests, Andrew
La Mar, Contra Costa Times, June 8th, 2005)
Here are
the well-known facts:
 | After an
extensive Joint Terrorism Task Force Investigation
(federal, state and local law enforcement), five
Lodi men were arrested. Two suspects, Umer and Hamid
Hayat, were charged with lying to federal officials
about alleged participation in and knowledge of Al-Queda
sponsored training camps. The three other suspects
have allegedly violated the terms of their visas. |
 | U.S.
Magistrate Judge Peter Nowinski twice denied bail to
the Hayats who he perceived as flight risks. |
 | The
Department of Justice indicted the Hayats. |
 | Defense
attorneys entered a
not guilty plea in Sacramento federal court on
behalf of both Hayats. |
Beyond
these hard facts everything is conjecture.
But if
speculation is the order of the day, let’s at least make
it interesting by responding to four compelling
questions and observations raised by analyst
Daniel Pipes of the Philadelphia-based
Middle East Forum.
First,
Pipes, in his
weblog dated June 11th noted that the
Hayat’s maternal grandmother Qari Saeed ur Rehman,
"founded the
Jamia Islamia Madrassa in 1962 (and still runs it),
is a leader in the
Jamiat Ulema Islam Party, and served as minister of
religious affairs in the late 1980s."
Since the Hayat family is directly
related to Pakistani
religious royalty why, wonders Pipes, are Umer and
Hamid in California toiling as unskilled laborers by
selling ice cream from a cart and
picking cherries?
Second, Pipes is curious why the
Hayat family traveled so often to Pakistan. Pipes is
not persuaded by the explanation of Wazhma Mojaddidi,
Hayat’s attorney, that it went to seek medical treatment
for the mother.
"Urdu-speaking doctors are not
hard to find in northern California and they dispose of
far superior facilities, so what's up?" Pipes asks.
Third, Pipes is puzzled by the $28,
093 found on the Hayats when they were stopped at
Dulles International Airport outside Washington,
D.C. Asks Pipes: "What is an ice-cream vendor doing
with such an amount of money and why is he breaking
U.S. customs regulations by taking out so much cash
without declaring it?" asks Pipes.
Finally, Pipes is curious about the
2003
Farooqia Islamic Center 2003 tax return that shows a
travel budget of $20, 635 or one-third the Center’s
total operating expenses of $57, 544.
Lodi has taken the investigation in
stride. Despite
suggestions to the contrary made by the
American Civil Liberties Union, no one—at least no
one I know—assumes or concludes that all Muslims are
terrorists.
But
Pipes raises important points that must be
addressed. To ignore Pipes is foolish because the stakes
in terrorism investigation are literally
life and death.
As the
F.B.I. has stated repeatedly, the five suspects will
have their day in court.
At that time, and not before, the
unanswered questions will be resolved.
Joe Guzzardi [email
him], an instructor in English
at the Lodi Adult School, has been writing a weekly
column since 1988. It currently appears in the
Lodi News-Sentinel.
|