Howard R Sutherland: “Most are actions we should
have taken long ago.”
Howard R
Sutherland writes:
Here are some thoughts about
tightening immigration and security controls to deter
terrorism. Of course, most are actions we should have
taken long ago. The nature of the September 11th
attacks and the motives of the murderers, to the extent
known, make clear that we are in a civilizational war
(of course, we are in a civilizational conflict with
Mexican irredentists and the multiculturalists already).
It is one that an America that is untroubled by too many
minarets or bodegas sprouting up across the landscape
won’t be able to win, so my bias is in favor of cultural
self-preservation. I list specific domestic security
actions first, followed by immigration proposals.
Travel Security:
All personnel, whether private
contractors or government employees, charged with
airport security must be U.S. citizens.
U.S. citizenship must be a
prerequisite for employment as a pilot by a U.S.
commercial air carrier, whether passenger or freight.
Pilots of commercial aircraft
hauling passengers or freight must be armed with 9mm
pistols that they have been trained to shoot. (Any
airline pilot who was a military aviator will have had
to qualify either with the 9mm or a .38, if not both:
for example, I qualified with the old .38 revolver when
I was an F-4 pilot, and requalified with the new 9mm
semiautomatic after my transition to the F-16). If there
is concern about rounds puncturing the hull and causing
rapid decompression (a pretty low risk anyway), issue
frangible rounds with enough stopping power to send a
hijacker to Gehenna but that will break up on hitting
metal. In the event of attempted hijackings, it must be
clear that pilots have no duty to let hijackers into the
cockpit; they must also be free (and trained) to
maneuver the airplane aggressively to disorient
hijackers and knock them off their feet. Cabin crew must
be familiarized with these maneuvers and know how to
hold on and then subdue hijackers after pilots perform
them. If they make passengers airsick, it’s better to be
queasy than dead. The priority is to foil the hijacker’s
purpose and land safely.
Secure cockpit doors, El-Al
fashion, so that they cannot be opened from the cabin.
Do not hire large numbers of “sky
marshals”; they will probably drain manpower from the
Border Patrol and other federal agencies that, for the
moment, cannot afford the losses.
Permit intelligent profiling,
that takes into account who terrorists are, in screening
passengers (and, of course, would-be airline and
security employees).
Immigration Enforcement:
States should repeal, or not pass
in the first place, laws relaxing identification
requirements that allow illegal aliens to get driver’s
licenses. If there is a constitutional way for the
Congress to preempt such state laws (make it a federal
felony for anyone in the United States illegally to
operate a motor vehicle?), it should.
States should repeal, or not pass
in the first place, “motor-voter” laws that invite
non-citizens to register to vote. A more egregious
breach of civic security than having aliens
participating in American political decisions through
illegal voting is hard to imagine. Aliens caught voting
in U.S. elections should be prosecuted and deported
(whether or not they were in the United States illegally
to begin with); such deportation should make them
presumptively ineligible to enter the United States in
the future. Again, if there is a constitutional way for
the Congress to preempt local or state laws that purport
to permit non-citizens to vote in local elections, it
should.
Make it a crime for a bank to
open an account for a foreign national who cannot
provide verifiable proof of legal residence in the
United States. Enforce against the banks, not just the
aliens.
Permit, nay encourage,
intelligent profiling by the police generally.
Reinforce the Border Patrol,
augmented by Active Army and National Guard units as
required, to take control of the Mexican and Canadian
borders. Expand the Coast Guard’s role in preventing
illegal entry from the sea; augment with Navy units and
Air Force surveillance if that is what it takes.
Reinforce the INS at other points
of entry, to prevent illegal entry. Use of the Armed
Forces for this is much more problematic than for border
patrol, which clearly is national defense, but there
should be a way, if that is what it takes.
Aggressively search for, and
deport, illegal aliens. Illegal aliens thus deported
should be presumptively ineligible for entry into the
United States in the future. No exceptions. Enforce
employer sanctions strictly. Enlist local law
enforcement in the effort.
End all state programs that offer
in-state tuition at any state university to any illegal
alien “resident” in that state.
Train Foreign Service officers in
screening visa applicants at U.S. embassies and
consulates. Encourage them to profile intelligently,
too. Set clear and stringent standards for granting
visas of all types, including visitor visas. Require the
State Department to enforce those standards, and monitor
it ruthlessly; we cannot assume that our professional
diplomats love their country. (Aside: Change staffing
and ambassadorial appointment practices that match
appointees to countries by race or ethnicity; rather
than send Hispanics to Latin American countries, blacks
to African and West Indian countries, Asians to Asian
countries and Jews to Israel, we should if anything do
the opposite. It is stupid to encourage divided
loyalties in those who are supposed to serve our
interests abroad. This applies also to INS and the
Border Patrol: have you noticed that most of the INS
officials cited in the press as responsible for dealing
with the Mexican border are Hispanic themselves? If we
must over-recruit Hispanics into our border defense
force, at least assign them to the Canadian border.)
Keep a central record, easily
accessible to law enforcement, of all visas granted.
Record all entries into the United States. Record all
departures. Implement a system that automatically alerts
the INS when the expiration date of a visa arrives and
there is no record of the holder’s departure. Issue a
standard, electronically verifiable, Alien
Identification Card to all foreign nationals at legal
entry into the United States. Require them to carry it
at all times while they are in the country, whatever
their visa status, subject to legal penalties up to and
including revocation of legal status and deportation for
failure to produce it on demand to law enforcement. Get
the word out to law enforcement at all levels that it is
not racist to ask to see it in the case of people
(stopped or arrested for some other reason) who are
obviously foreign. Require them to surrender it on
departure, and design it so that on expiration of the
visa, or if tampered with, it activates and becomes a
locator beacon so that the offending alien can be
tracked, apprehended and deported (actually, it would
not be a bad idea to have the tracking function active
all the time).
Record all apprehensions of
attempted illegal entrants; they should be presumed
ineligible for visas and legal residence in the United
States. Knowing that getting caught trying to sneak in
will make it almost impossible to get in legally later
should be a deterrent, especially if we make it likely
that border jumpers will be caught. Any case-by-case
process for examining such peoples’ subsequent visa
requests needs to be very stringent and subject to
political oversight, so that immigration judges cannot
subvert the program through lenient rulings.
Make an example through ruthless
prosecution of INS, Border Patrol and other officials
who are complicit in violations of the immigration laws.
As noted above, many are Hispanic themselves and no
doubt might be swayed to help their fellows get in.
Harsh punishment will help them overcome the temptation.
Immigration Policy:
(See above for putting teeth into
deterrence of illegal aliens.)
End legal immigration for at
least a decade; we need a pause to digest. There will
need to be some very limited exceptions, of course. They
must be based on objective criteria that are determined
solely in the interest of the United States. Family
reunification in general is not such a criterion.
“Economic refugee” status is not one, either. Along with
any critical skills criteria we adopt for consideration
of individual exceptions, reasonable spoken and written
English must be a prerequisite. (If we cannot eliminate
legal immigration altogether, at least end the diversity
lottery and all effective amnesty programs for illegal
aliens. End family reunification as currently
structured.)
Freeze naturalizations of current
legally resident aliens, for at least five years. Anyone
who, after five years’ residence in the United States,
cannot demonstrate English proficiency should lose the
opportunity to be naturalized and have his residency
status reviewed.
Review recent naturalizations;
people found to have been naturalized under false
pretenses should be subject to revocation of their U.S.
citizenship (to which they presumably were not entitled
in the first place) and deportation. Such people should
be considered presumptively ineligible for reentry.
Encourage repatriation of
immigrants who cannot or will not assimilate or who will
not work (deport those who become public charges).
Statutorily eliminate birthright
citizenship for all but the children of U.S. citizens.
Statutorily eliminate the
possibility of dual citizenship for anyone 18 or older.
Affirm that holding political
office in a foreign country and serving in a foreign
armed force (especially as an officer) are presumptively
grounds for being stripped of U.S. citizenship.
Refugee status must be granted
only on the basis of credible likelihood of persecution
on a political or religious basis, and the
unavailability of suitable refuge closer to refugees’
homes. Sexual orientation, for example, won’t cut it.
American refugee policy should be guided by the
principle of settling refugees as close to home as
possible (same continent, at least), among people of the
same race and religion to the greatest extent possible.
Their speedy return to their home countries is the goal.
We should be generous in support of genuine refugees,
but settlement in the United States should be actively
discouraged.
Freeze grants of student visas
until the monitoring system enacted by the Congress, but
whose implementation has been blocked by Spencer Abraham
and others, is fully in place. The costs of the system
should be borne by the visa holders. Once reactivated,
visas should only be granted to those who will be
studying at institutions that have indicated their
willingness to participate fully. Obviously, this
includes immediately reporting to INS when a student for
whom a visa has been obtained fails to matriculate, is
expelled, drops out or graduates.
End the H-1B visa program.
End all programs that allow
waivers of the standard visa application and evaluation
process; especially eliminate the abuse inherent in
245i.
Underlying all of these proposals
is a clear understanding that we cannot confuse the
human rights inherent in all people with the
Constitutional rights of U.S. citizens. These proposals
would impose a considerable burden on law-abiding
foreigners who wish to visit, study or work in the
United States. We have had an immigration crisis for a
long time. Now we have a security crisis to match. My
proposals are a reasonable response to an unreasonable
situation.
October 10, 2001