September 17, 2007
Treason Lobby’s DREAM Act—Amnesty For Anchor
Adults
By Marcus Epstein
Immediately after the defeat
of the
S 1348 amnesty, I
warned in Human Events that we could expect a
series of mini amnesties beginning with the
DREAM Act, which would give amnesty to illegal
aliens who came to this country before the age of 16 and
who achieve a
high school diploma or GED. (DREAM stands for
"Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors",
which was likely an afterthought, as with the
"Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept
and Obstruct Terrorism " Act—the DREAM Act is
supposed to evoke the American Dream, just as the
PATRIOT Act is
supposed to evoke patriotism. )
Just on schedule, the
nightmare begins. The DREAM Act is expected to tacked on
to a Senate defense appropriations bill and voted on as
early as this week.
There are several factors that make this bill
difficult to defeat. The Bush administration had taken
some steps—both
symbolically and logistically—to beef up
border security and
interior enforcement. While obviously inadequate,
these provide some cover. So a number of Senators who
voted against amnesty in June now suggest they are
inclined to vote for the DREAM amnesty. That it was
attached to a defense bill, rather than a
"comprehensive immigration reform"
bill, was probably intended to give
Democrats leverage by
conceding the Republicans’ defense agenda in
exchange for support of
DREAM ACT.
There are many easy ways to rebut these arguments.
The
deportation of Elvira Arellano
may have been an
important symbolic message—but it doesn’t change the
fact that our borders are not secure, and there are
still 12-20 million illegal aliens in this country
flouting our laws, and they aren’t going back soon.
Furthermore, if the DREAM Act supporters really
believe in this legislation, they should introduce it as
a separate bill and let it stand or fall on its own
merits. It is hard to see how giving amnesty to at least
one million illegal aliens—some of whom are no doubt
potential terrorists—has anything to do with
National Defense.
Dick Durbin, who is responsible for tacking it on to
the defense bill,
justifies the action because the DREAM Act contains
a provision that gives some illegals permanent legal
status in exchange for
military service. This fits with the ideals of many
Invade The World/Invite The World neoconservatives
like
Max Boot who have
called for an
illegal alien legion.
In the end, of course, what makes this amnesty more
appealing to many Senators is that it is ostensibly
limited to people who
came to the country when they were children. They
argue that no one should punish a child for the
transgressions of his parents, so we must grant them
legal status.
Maybe the illegal aliens who were brought here as
children aren’t to blame. However, the problem with that
line of argument is it assumes that not being given
legal status is a punishment. But being a legal
resident, much less a citizen, of the United States is a
privilege—not a right for anyone born outside
this country.
There are
billions of children across the globe who are living
in conditions much worse than illegal alien children in
the U.S.—and for that matter even worse than in Mexico.
There are also hundreds of thousands of foreigners
waiting in line to come to this country legally.
There is absolutely no reason why the children of
parents who broke the law have any more claim to the
blessing of living in America than they do.
If we accept the illegal aliens who came here as
children have no right to be here, we should ask if they
are good for Americans. In many ways, the children are
worse. While it is true that by undercutting wages,
illegal aliens give some very marginal macroeconomic
gains to the economy, this is greatly outweighed by the
benefits that are largely given to their children, such
as
public schools and
Medicaid. While adult illegal aliens may be
hard-working, the data is clear that
many of their children are
assimilating downwards, to
American underclass.
Immigration enthusiasts constantly repeat the adage:
"Immigrants do the jobs Americans won’t do."
Yet this bill also gives illegal aliens
in state tuition and federal loans at colleges where the
vast majority of them will also benefit from racial
preferences. Last I checked,
going to college wasn’t a "job Americans won’t
do." In fact, it seems like there was quite a bit of
noise
made by politicians about the increased cost of
tuition and
abuse of student loans.
At least where I went to college, they don’t teach
you how to
mow lawns or wash dishes. So on graduating all these
illegals will now be
competing for even more jobs that Americans are more
than willing to do. I have no desire to have a
Mexican servile class, but many immigration
enthusiasts
apparently do—witness
Karl Rove telling a Republican women’s group that he
didn’t want his son to
pick tomatoes—yet this is completely contradictory
to the propaganda behind the DREAM Act.
And while it may be true that "the children aren’t
to blame", there still is someone who is to blame:
the children’s parents who brought them to this country
illegally. But once these children are put on "a path
to citizenship" they will become “anchor adults”—who
will be able to sponsor their illegal alien parents and
other family members.
Even if this bill goes according to plan, it would be
a disaster. But of course it won’t go according to
plan—there is plenty of room for fraud that will make it
even worse.
The biggest loophole: because illegal aliens often
operate under the table, there is no way to prove
how long they have been in the country, and how old they
were when they first came. This bill envisages no upper
age limit, so any illegal alien can say they came here
under the age of sixteen. According to Kris Kobach, in a
Heritage Foundation Backgrounder, "a
45 year old can claim that he illegally entered the
United States 30 years ago at the age of 15."
[A
Sleeper Amnesty: Time to Wake Up from the DREAM Act,
September 13, 2007]. All they need to do to "prove"
they were under 16 when they broke into this country
is…sign an affidavit.
To make matters worse, once an illegal alien files an
application—no matter how far fetched it is—he cannot be
deported.
The DREAM act debate will set the stage for many more
mini-amnesties. It will be a big test for the
patriotic immigration reform movement.
As I noted in my
post mortem of the Amnesty/Immigration Surge Bill at
VDARE.COM, the Open Borders lobby is hoping that the
mass opposition to the Bush/ Kennedy amnesty was just a
flash in the pan. For all the talk of a
"techno-populist" rebellion I am worried that
all the bloggers and talk radio show hosts who opposed
the last amnesty are too busy cheerleading the war in
Iraq to stop the invasion at home.
As in the summer, America’s one hope is that
patriotic Americans let their politicians know that they
are opposed to all amnesties of all sizes and they won’t
forgive any of them pass—even if "it’s for the
children."
Marcus Epstein
[send
him mail] is the founder
of the Robert A Taft
Club and the executive director of the
The American
Cause and
Team America PAC. A selection of his articles can be seen
here. The
views he expresses are his own.